Here is an email I sent to William Hill but have yet to receive a reply.
I have noticed that the video slots payout is the lowest of your games but do you have the payout % of each individual slot?
Also is each game result independent from the last and truely random?
Finally I have noticed that WH have applied for a remote Casino license will this affect payout % of your slots come September and will you be keeping the same software provider?
Many thanks
As far as I know there are thus far no Casinos using the MG software platform that have applied for a UK remote Casino license.
William Hill and Littlewoods two respected companies that have applied for remote Casino licenses both use Wager logic.
Neither of these companies currently give individual payout percentages for their slots but William Hill report their anual payout on slots at 91%
This is a well respected company that openly provides audit and payout information and yet slot payout is still only 91% now contrast this approach with MG who will not give out percentage payout information on their slots and have no Casinos that have applied for UK licenses yet we are expected to believe their slots payout is higher (around 95%).
Certainly in my long experience with MG they are nearer 85%
Zoozies slot analysis can not be faulted but it is assumed that the games are completely random and fair and that the paytables remain the same and that the reels are not changed in any way.
Non of this can be independently verified by a regulatory body.
The situation is even worse with RTG.
The fact is that slots that have a bonus feature that is activated by a scatter win and has high potential rewards surely are NOT truely random in the way they operate.
This is because the payout percentage would alter quite significantly with the number of lines played and playing just one line would yield optimum payout percentages.
This is not true of a slot that just offers free spins where they payout % remains unaltered by the amount of lines played.
This leads me to the conclusion that bonus games are manipulated in the amount that they payout and/or in the frequency they are activated or some slots may actualy be more profitable played at 1 line (Zoozie do the maths).
Certainly the first of these conclusions is unsavoury the second is unpalatable (unpalatable truth?) and the third leaves a strange after taste.
I am ready to accept my thinking or facts might be flawed in some way here and welcome thoughts and comments particular from those inside the industry.
So what does all this mean for slots players?
It means that unless RTG,MG and other major software providers find a company that is willing to use their platform in a fully regulated and licensed market (UK remote Casino license,september) there will always be legitimate questions about the fairness of their games.
For companies such as wager logic (assuming WH and Ladbrokes keep them) the opposite will be true but being legitimised in this way will not be enough if slot payout % remain so low.
Slots players you can have it all;
A properly regulated Casino using legitimate software with higher payout percentages.
All you have to do is find your voice and vote with your money.
Appologies for such a long post.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote







see my ripped off again thread


Bookmarks