Doreen H - Party Casino

**darkpixie** · 17th December 2006, 06:53 PM

And another: $ 5122.80
man!

**Slotster!** · 17th December 2006, 07:12 PM

Doreen H = KasinoKing

**Zoozie** · 17th December 2006, 08:10 PM

Originally Posted by vinylweatherman

Given this, the fact that Doreen H has been hitting nearly all the jackpots for what seems several days must be looked at (it must be putting customers off if they start thinking the game is rigged against them). I find it hard to believe a player can be running at $90 per spin for more than 3 days unless said player is finding the game is paying close on (or above!) 100% for their large bet size. This is a trap many sites fall into by displaying big payouts without also mentioning the winning stake. This can be seen with MG casinos who publish payouts from normal (non-progressive) gaming. One player dominating the tables is betting big, so the payouts look grand, but represent a more modest return on a bigger stake.

I agree it is a little fishy and no harm done by asking questions. I just tried to find a logical explanation. If she is betting 100$/spin and hitting a jackpot every 1 hour, then a player betting 1$/spin should hit the jackpot every 100 hours. If this is way to rare for a 1$/spin player to hit the jackpot this often, then she must be player even higher bets, or there is something fishy indeed.

Zoozie

**BingoT** · 17th December 2006, 08:21 PM

She Married? I like to get to know her better

I need a Winner in my life.

Oh no I'm Married To A Bigger Winner Yahoo

**frufrugirl** · 18th December 2006, 05:44 AM

lol you naughty boy....

.
.
.Could Doreen H just be a stand in name for the winners who do not want to be named? Examples -US

players who do not want Uncle Sam to know they won some money-

**wangpoker** · 18th December 2006, 07:59 AM

i think she caught a bug of the party casino.

**KasinoKing** · 18th December 2006, 08:26 AM

Originally Posted by Slotster!

Doreen H = KasinoKing

In your dreams!

I saw a photo of Doreen H on a website - looked like a big blue muppet....

**Slotster!** · 18th December 2006, 12:20 PM

Originally Posted by KasinoKing

In your dreams!

I saw a photo of Doreen H on a website - looked like a big blue muppet....

Incidentally, I don't think there's anything at all odd about this. If I wanted to sit playing �45 a spin on the Rapid Fire's at Intercasino - I'd hit it on a regular basis, at least a few times each hour I'd wager... So this is clearly what Doreen H is up to. Just wagering crazy money over and over - hitting the jackpots as she goes along. Put it this way, it's far more likely that it's true and genuine because if there was something dodgy going on - they'd change the names round a bit.

Bet she stops hitting them soon... with that sort of wagering, your balance is going to get depleted in no time.

On an entirely unrelated note - what's going on with this ad at the top of the page! Anyone else think it's a bit "A Clockwork Orange"?

Viddy this my droogs:

**winbig** · 18th December 2006, 12:26 PM

Originally Posted by Slotster!

Incidentally, I don't think there's anything at all odd about this. If I wanted to sit playing �45 a spin on the Rapid Fire's at Intercasino - I'd hit it on a regular basis, at least a few times each hour I'd wager... So this is clearly what Doreen H is up to. Just wagering crazy money over and over - hitting the jackpots as she goes along. Put it this way, it's far more likely that it's true and genuine because if there was something dodgy going on - they'd change the names round a bit.

Sure, but if the chance of hitting these jackpots are increased by the more you bet, what chance to the lowrollers have to hit one? Slim to none.

**Zoozie** · 18th December 2006, 12:59 PM

Originally Posted by winbig

Sure, but if the chance of hitting these jackpots are increased by the more you bet, what chance to the lowrollers have to hit one? Slim to none.

Do you not agree that the most fair way for a slot is that payout% is independant of bet-size? For that to be true with a random jackpot, the probablity for winning the jackpot has to be proportional to the bet size.

Else the jackpot could be 'exploited' by betting 0.01$/spin.

So lets assume there is 10.000$ in the jackpot and winning it is independant of bet size with CONSTANT probability = 1 to 10M. Betting 0.01$ with this 1 to 10M for winning the jackpot then increases the slots payout% by 10%!

So basically this shows a slot can not work this way unless you make the chance for winning the jackpot extremely rare (and then highrollers would not play it) or it could be possible to exploit the slot by betting 0.01$.

Favoring high bets IS the only way to do it fair, but it has to be proportional. Highrollers are also building up the jackpots with a equally higher rate so that the low rollers then also benefit the higher bets.

Zoozie