Campaign to end the FU term

**thechap** · 23rd August 2006, 03:13 AM

Just wondering peoples thoughts are on accredited casinos being allowed to have and invoke the FU rule. This rule basically states "even if you have not broke any conditions we have the right to not pay you if we so desire rule".

I 100% think that this rule should not be allowed at any accredited casino. If they dont put enough thought or care into writing their terms and conditions to exclude actions they don't want and they duely suffer because if it, it is nobodies fault but their own. In such cases they should suffer the loss instead of this spineless act of retrospective denial that has been shown in both the giant vegas and vegas affiliate complaint threads.

What are other forum members views on this? Should this rule be tolerated? Is there any circumstance where it is acceptable? Who will join me in my campaign to rid this scurge of the online casino world?

viva la revoulution (if it takes off!)

**bossplayer** · 23rd August 2006, 04:14 AM

If Casinomeister takes this up, I will gladly push for everyone to give you thanks!

**nikest** · 23rd August 2006, 04:37 AM

i 100% agree.

**tennis_balls** · 23rd August 2006, 05:36 AM

Yahoo! Video

**Vesuvio** · 23rd August 2006, 09:46 AM

Originally Posted by thechap

I 100% think that this rule should not be allowed at any accredited casino. If they dont put enough thought or care into writing their terms and conditions to exclude actions they don't want and they duely suffer because if it, it is nobodies fault but their own.

The thing is in 99% of cases they knew exactly what they were doing when they wrote the terms - invoking the escape clause is just a way of increasing their profits from the few players who actually win.

**KasinoKing** · 23rd August 2006, 02:04 PM

Originally Posted by thechap

What are other forum members views on this? Should this rule be tolerated? Is there any circumstance where it is acceptable? Who will join me in my campaign to rid this scourge of the online casino world?

viva la revolution (if it takes off!)

You have less than zero chance of getting anything changed.
If I owned a casino I would have this condition too!

As for 'accredited' ones - I think it highly unlikely that any on CM's list would actually invoke this rule, unless due to serious fraud/abuse/naughtiness by the player.

The problem is with the rogue operators - the only way to get them to change is to try to keep unsuspecting newbies from signing up in the first place by making sure they check out Casinomeister's site first!
If we could only stop people depositing at 'dodgy' sites the online casino world would be a much better place!