Omni came up in another thread, so I felt this matter was worthy of comment.
This term is still unchanged. As Clayman said, you would think it's irrelevant - how can you have wagering "done primarily using promotional funds and not deposited funds" when there are no promotional funds in the account until $4000 in wagers has been achieved? And yet, they are still excluding players from their promos. On what basis? "Deposit abuse"? They clearly - though incorrectly - define "bonus abuse" as "wagering primarily with bonus"; so, players deposit and play without a bonus, request the bonus, and are denied because of "bonus abuse".Originally Posted by Clayman
Abuse of that which doesn't exist, and as such can't be abused.
Anyone thinking of patronizing Omni, read this thread well.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Bookmarks