Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Fortune Group

  1. #1
    AussieDave's Avatar
    AussieDave is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,753
    Thanks
    881
    Thanked 1,014 Times in 492 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 5403

    Fortune Group

    I'm not real happy

    Over the past weekend I'd played email ping pong with their CSR's and eventually it got esculated to the Floor manager.

    The guts of this was about a bonus.

    I don't like posting publically, I much prefer to try and sort this out myself. However having sent PM's to FG's contact here and not receive one repsonse my patience has growth thin.

    Epsecially after receiving this promo just now:

    "Here's a fresh offer for you from Fortune Lounge. We appreciate your loyalty and would like to offer you this 20% bonus on your deposits."

    BS if you appreciated my loyality you'd treat better than you have!
    I'm not a VIP but have reach gold status in one month, so in my book that's got to account for something.

    This lack of response it not good enough, it's not acceptable and it's definately something I wouldn't expect from such a casino group.

  2. #2
    Simmo!'s Avatar
    Simmo! is offline Moderator Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial Magnet!Tagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    You say UK, I say England.
    Posts
    9,277
    Thanks
    1,696
    Thanked 4,373 Times in 2,080 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Reputation Points: 23384
    There was something else along these lines recently - ah yes, the Phoenician thread: moving to Casino Rewards.

    I'll restate my opinion, for what it's worth. I think there is a correlation (I'm generalising) between the quality of support offered to players and the number of casinos handled by the support centre. Not surprising - happens in any business that expands and underestimates the scalability required.

    But Belle Rock and Casino Rewards - two other large groups - suffer a similar problem. Casino Action, in my mind, seem to be the exception as things stand. However, from my recent conversations on the matter with representatives from both BR and Fortune, it seems like they have finally realised that maybe the number of brands they try to support affects the players to such an extent, that scaling down is the sensible option.

    Both groups are losing brands in 2006, and I think - hope - as a result we will see an improvement from now on in. Time will tell...but rather than just hearing "the right noises" we've become used to over the past year or more, there finally seems to be some actions.

    Fingers crossed...and I know it doesn't help you now Trezz - sorry

    Cheers

    Simmo!


  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Simmo! For This Useful Post:

    AussieDave (4th May 2006)

  4. #3
    suzecat's Avatar
    suzecat is offline Ueber Meister
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    San Diego, CA USA!!!
    Posts
    1,344
    Thanks
    1,043
    Thanked 1,095 Times in 550 Posts
    Rep Power
    66
    Reputation Points: 5696
    Quote Originally Posted by Trezz
    I'm not real happy

    Over the past weekend I'd played email ping pong with their CSR's and eventually it got esculated to the Floor manager.

    The guts of this was about a bonus.

    I don't like posting publically, I much prefer to try and sort this out myself. However having sent PM's to FG's contact here and not receive one repsonse my patience has growth thin.

    Epsecially after receiving this promo just now:

    "Here's a fresh offer for you from Fortune Lounge. We appreciate your loyalty and would like to offer you this 20% bonus on your deposits."

    BS if you appreciated my loyality you'd treat better than you have!
    I'm not a VIP but have reach gold status in one month, so in my book that's got to account for something.

    This lack of response it not good enough, it's not acceptable and it's definately something I wouldn't expect from such a casino group.
    UGH! Trezz, this is the pits and you deserve better. Hopefully the CM will read this and alert the rep (if he hasn't already done so.)
    Crapmeister.com

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to suzecat For This Useful Post:

    AussieDave (4th May 2006)

  6. #4
    AussieDave's Avatar
    AussieDave is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,753
    Thanks
    881
    Thanked 1,014 Times in 492 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 5403
    Simmo! & suzecat,

    Thanks for the support it's appreciated

    I'll also go onto say that I feel you've hit the proverbial nail on the head Simmo!

    Until such time as these large groups realise that it comes down to providing top notch A+ support <not generic BS from generic support centers> everything else fades into obscurity, imo.

    Basically what I'm saying is no one should have to resort to coming to a forum to achieve what should have been taken care of in the first instance.

    Cheers

  7. #5
    pacers31 is offline Banned Used - Repetitive violations of rule 1.1 (no flaming) and rule 1.14 (no trolls)
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Californication
    Posts
    646
    Thanks
    229
    Thanked 301 Times in 179 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 1496

    Empty offers

    Hi all,

    I'm sure this happens to just about everyone, and while I know it is simply a matter of deleting the offer and moving on, I just wanted to vent about these "incredible, not to be missed" offers I receive via email for the free play promos. Received one from Platinum Play (Fortune Lounge) today that offered $200 free money to play with. Of course I already had an account with them, so the offer was disallowed for me. Why do they bother sending these emails when all it is going to do is piss me off when they inform me that I am ineligible for the bonus because I already have an account?? Live chat told me that it was sent by an affiliate. Don't the sites advise the affiliates about who is already a customer before they send these offers out?? Mass emails to people who are going to be denied the bonus offer anyway only builds anomosity toward the site. I know they say any publicity is good publicity, but in a business like this where competition is so keen, I don't understand why they would want to create a problem for themselves.

    I know it is a minor thing, but it's sort of like waking up christmas morning and finding presents with your name on them only to be told that they aren't yours. I removed myself from the list, but it just seems like bad business to me. Any thoughts anyone??

  8. #6
    Simmo!'s Avatar
    Simmo! is offline Moderator Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial Magnet!Tagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    You say UK, I say England.
    Posts
    9,277
    Thanks
    1,696
    Thanked 4,373 Times in 2,080 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Reputation Points: 23384
    Quote Originally Posted by pacers31
    Live chat told me that it was sent by an affiliate. Don't the sites advise the affiliates about who is already a customer before they send these offers out??
    Firstly, a casino never discloses its player base or any personal details, email included, to an affiliate. Even the players an affiliate may have sent to that casino. So any affiliate spamming is done from a) a list that affiliate has built up or b) from a list purchased elsewhere. May just be coincidence that you had a Platinum Play account and the spam was for a bonus at Platinum Play.

    Regarding these "ineligible offers" that keep coming up (not just at Fortune incidentally), here's my guess as to what is happening. A casino has a big player database and probably develops "filters" for offers. IE: send this bonus email to every player who has deposited $500 but not played for two months. Only possibly they complicate it a bit, and possibly that includes players they don't want to encourage, for whatever reason.

    So essentially, their filters aren't 100% accurate, and the decision is that rather than spend a millenium hand-picking or removing those required/not-required, we'll send it anyway and deny at the point they come in. Probably far more cost-effective and simpler, albeit with an overhead. Plus the fact these players aren't required, probably means if they piss them off it matters less.

    Cheers

    Simmo!


  9. #7
    fortunelounge's Avatar
    fortunelounge is offline Accredited Casino Representative Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience PointsFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    297
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 211 Times in 63 Posts
    Rep Power
    44
    Reputation Points: 1119
    The decision regarding Trezz's bonus was shortsighted and the service he received was totally unacceptable. I am currently dealing with both these issues.

    I received Trezz's PM and was unable to respond as I was not available. I did, however, send him an apology this morning and comped his account with an appropriate bonus.

    The fact that Trezz dealt with a relatively new agent is, however, no excuse and this incident has showed that we still have a way to go in terms of providing excellent service.

    VP Operations
    Fortune Lounge
    fortunelounge

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fortunelounge For This Useful Post:

    ballysdb (4th May 2006), Mousey (4th May 2006)

  11. #8
    AussieDave's Avatar
    AussieDave is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,753
    Thanks
    881
    Thanked 1,014 Times in 492 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 5403
    Hi,

    I'd just like to say that fortunelounge has contacted me and this issue has been sorted out extremely well.

    Thanx



    Trezz

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to AussieDave For This Useful Post:

    fortunelounge (4th May 2006)

  13. #9
    pacers31 is offline Banned Used - Repetitive violations of rule 1.1 (no flaming) and rule 1.14 (no trolls)
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Californication
    Posts
    646
    Thanks
    229
    Thanked 301 Times in 179 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 1496
    I get what you're saying Simmo, still leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I just don't like getting an invitation to a party, then being denied entry when I show up. If the offer is only for those that don't have an account why send it? For that matter, why would they send any offer like this to anyone already a customer?? That seems like a waste of time for all concerned.

  14. #10
    Simmo!'s Avatar
    Simmo! is offline Moderator Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial Magnet!Tagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    You say UK, I say England.
    Posts
    9,277
    Thanks
    1,696
    Thanked 4,373 Times in 2,080 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Reputation Points: 23384
    Quote Originally Posted by pacers31
    I get what you're saying Simmo, still leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I just don't like getting an invitation to a party, then being denied entry when I show up. If the offer is only for those that don't have an account why send it? For that matter, why would they send any offer like this to anyone already a customer?? That seems like a waste of time for all concerned.
    Agreed. But I guess it boils down to being "more cost effective" for the casino to do it this way...assuming I'm right of course Albeit with an element of not seeing the woods through the trees thrown in!


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Playtech IPO
    By Casinomeister in forum Casino Industry Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28th March 2006, 09:46 AM
  2. Betinternet 2002 Annual Report
    By mary in forum Casino Industry Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 29th November 2002, 03:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.