Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 106

Thread: UltimateBet - Absolute Poker Scam

  1. #31
    jetset's Avatar
    jetset is offline Ueber Meister Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Blog entry50000 Experience PointsPeople Likes YouTagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    12,356
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    2,062
    Thanked 5,463 Times in 2,354 Posts
    Rep Power
    256
    Reputation Points: 29991
    Mainstream media seem to be picking the story up - long article in the National Post today.
    jetset

  2. #32
    lots0 is offline Banned User - troll posts - flaming Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsPeople Likes YouFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    2,205
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 806 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 9077
    Just like to point out one inconstancy in Tokwiro's statement.

    May 2008: The investigation confirms that the fraudulent activity took place from March 7, 2006 to December 3, 2007.
    February 2008: UltimateBet discovers the unauthorised code that allowed the perpetrators to obtain hole card information during live play. The code was part of a legacy auditing system that was manipulated by the (unidentified) perpetrators of the fraud. UltimateBet immediately removes the unauthorised code and works with the KGC and with third-party auditors to verify that the security hole has been eliminated.
    Am I the only person that wonders why Tokwiro says the cheating stopped on December 3rd, 2007, but according to Tokwiro they did not even discover and remove the "unauthorised code" until February 2008.

    The phrase "lying scumbag thieves" comes to my mind when thinking about Tokwiro/Absolute Poker/UltimateBet.

    I would also like to see a full accounting of all the money stolen by these nameless thieves and Tokwrio's attempts to repay the players the money that was stolen from them.

    And then we have the fact that Tokwrio appears to be protecting the thieves! Why not release the names of the thieves? Why not turn the thieves over to Law Enforcement? Maybe because it would be hard to explain to outsiders why the only change in ownership at AP/UB is in fantasy land...

    As far as the pokeraffiliateprogram postings, it is more than obvious to anyone that takes the time to look, that a large group of poker affiliates are nothing but whores that will do anything for money.

  3. #33
    fatshaft's Avatar
    fatshaft is offline Full Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Isle of Man
    Posts
    91
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
    Rep Power
    34
    Reputation Points: 43
    Quote Originally Posted by Casinomeister View Post

    There are scores of poker rooms, and unless AP and UB offer something 100% exclusive that is found nowhere on this planet, then it is beyond me why anyone is still playing there or promoting them for that matter. Baffling
    This is the biggest mystery, or perhaps not? Stars only runs CPA at $75 a head, so there's no lifetime earn for a player, and if you're a US afiliate you then have Tilt, before you get to the next biggest two US supporting rooms - these two rogues.

    Then you get Cake, some MG rooms and Bodog, all the rest are minute.

    So if the majority of your traffic is US based, then there is likely to be a fair hit to your earnings as an affiliate. I say likely, but surely take those two sites down and your players will move to Cake or Bodog or the like, after all if they havn;t heard of UB or AP by now, they sure as hell won't have heard of Cake!

    Too many affiliates are purely in it for the bottom line, even those who dress up their site as some sort of player advisory or community flag bearer.

    More sites need to follow 2+2, BW and the Meister IMO in outing and blacklisting places like these.

  4. #34
    Mousey's Avatar
    Mousey is offline Ueber Meister Mouse Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures25000 Experience PointsOverdriveSocial Magnet!
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Up$hitCreek
    Posts
    3,046
    Thanks
    2,484
    Thanked 2,657 Times in 1,426 Posts
    Rep Power
    117
    Reputation Points: 14003
    Linky to National Post article referenced earlier.
    Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
    The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.

  5. #35
    jetset's Avatar
    jetset is offline Ueber Meister Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Blog entry50000 Experience PointsPeople Likes YouTagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    12,356
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    2,062
    Thanked 5,463 Times in 2,354 Posts
    Rep Power
    256
    Reputation Points: 29991
    Some heavy damage control going on at present here:

    http://www.pokernews.com/news/2008/0...et-scandal.htm

    Annie Duke says she was ready to distance herself from Ultimate Bet until "new management" took over and fully disclosed. Blames previous management.

    She now has "a lot of say in the business" and claims that all the "bad apples" have been removed and consequently is confident that everything is hunky dory.

    But there's some confusion there regarding "change of management" and "sale of the company" - both of which are referred to but without clarity or sufficient detail to be convincing afaic.

    The failure to identify the culprit publicly is explained as mainly due to legal difficulties surrounding identification of the perpetrator and under which jurisdiction to proceed, but UB is apparently investigating.

    Seven figures were repaid to disadvantaged players, but again no specifics.

    UB revenues were "not affected" by the scandal, AD claims.

    Points to big name pros agreeing to be associated with UB (looks like one of the UB strategies) as an endorsement.

    Annie Duke is a very respected name on the poker side of the business, but personally, I was not left with a comfortable feeling after viewing this video interview.

    There's a clearly apparent apprehension that the upcoming "60 Minutes" program is going to make the industry look bad (UltimateBet more so, i.m.v.) The producer has recently been in contact with Annie D at WSOP, but it isn't clear what the result of that was.

    Personal assessment: damage control move, and this scandal is hurting more than they wish to admit. A closing comment was to the effect that continued bashing of UB is not good for the industry. Personally, I think there has to be a lot more of the much-used word "transparency" here, especially regarding this "new ownership" question....or is that "new management?"
    jetset

  6. #36
    D!G!TAL's Avatar
    D!G!TAL is offline Full Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    Reputation Points: 80
    Quote Originally Posted by jetset View Post
    The failure to identify the culprit publicly is explained as mainly due to legal difficulties surrounding identification of the perpetrator and under which jurisdiction to proceed, but UB is apparently investigating.
    This makes me really angry. The funds from this criminal activity had to be taken out of the system at some point.

    With so much money involved it was most likely bank transfers which would make identifying the end recipient fairly easy. Even tracing back via a web wallet shouldnt prove too difficult.

    If the funds are out there in limbo somewhere, waiting to be laundered, the card rooms should do the honourable thing and start repaying ALL players that were stolen from. IMO they should be doing this anyway, in full, in order to beging the difficult task of rebuilding their image.

    Regards, e.

  7. #37
    lots0 is offline Banned User - troll posts - flaming Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsPeople Likes YouFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    2,205
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 806 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 9077
    Quote Originally Posted by D!G!TAL View Post
    This makes me really angry. The funds from this criminal activity had to be taken out of the system at some point.

    With so much money involved it was most likely bank transfers which would make identifying the end recipient fairly easy. Even tracing back via a web wallet shouldnt prove too difficult.

    If the funds are out there in limbo somewhere, waiting to be laundered, the card rooms should do the honourable thing and start repaying ALL players that were stolen from. IMO they should be doing this anyway, in full, in order to beging the difficult task of rebuilding their image.

    Regards, e.
    Dude... The management at AP/UB know who did it... They just don't want the public to know... Because if the public did know who was stealing all that money... they would be outraged.

  8. #38
    D!G!TAL's Avatar
    D!G!TAL is offline Full Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    Reputation Points: 80
    Quote Originally Posted by lots0 View Post
    Dude... The management at AP/UB know who did it... They just don't want the public to know... Because if the public did know who was stealing all that money... they would be outraged.
    Definitely, they must be paying some serious 'hush hush' money to keep this quiet... but the truth has a way of eventually making itself known...

    What gets me angry aswell, aside from the honest players losing out, is the damage it does to the industry as a whole. With the Frank amendment not getting through and these kind of issues going on it only adds weight to arguments by those against online gambling in general.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to D!G!TAL For This Useful Post:

    lots0 (28th June 2008)

  10. #39
    GaryWatson is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    862
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks
    280
    Thanked 409 Times in 211 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 2140
    I shows the industry cannot self regulate.

    The UIGEA has done nothing more than send US players to rogue sites/rogue ewallets.

    If it wasnt for 2+2 and their huge efforts, most of us would be none the wiser

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to GaryWatson For This Useful Post:

    Rusty (29th July 2008)

  12. #40
    lots0 is offline Banned User - troll posts - flaming Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsPeople Likes YouFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    2,205
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked 1,631 Times in 806 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 9077
    Quote Originally Posted by D!G!TAL View Post
    Definitely, they must be paying some serious 'hush hush' money to keep this quiet... but the truth has a way of eventually making itself known...
    It's all those $168,000 apiece TV commercials and Million dollar+ $ponsorships by one or two big names... If AP/UB have a bunch of nice TV commercials, a hot spokesmodel and a weird guy that won a lot of WSOP bracelets who wears their name plastered all over his body... well they can't be all bad now can they?
    It just goes to show ya that money can buy respectability, no matter how much you've stolen...

    Quote Originally Posted by D!G!TAL View Post
    What gets me angry aswell, aside from the honest players losing out, is the damage it does to the industry as a whole. With the Frank amendment not getting through and these kind of issues going on it only adds weight to arguments by those against online gambling in general.
    I couldn't agree more. These A-Holes seem to be doing everything they can to screw it up for the rest of us.

Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Absolute Poker Blackjack
    By SeattleSinner in forum Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 23rd September 2008, 10:59 PM
  2. Absolute Poker Could Become Safest Poker Room - Not
    By Rollo in forum Casino Industry Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 20th November 2007, 11:30 PM
  3. Absolute poker Deposit.....
    By TomEatv in forum Casinomeister's Poker Room
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 31st August 2007, 05:40 AM
  4. Absolute Poker doesn't like the fox from Tally Ho
    By realwtfsup in forum Casinomeister's Poker Room
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16th July 2005, 11:11 PM
  5. Absolute Poker
    By pokeraddict in forum Casinomeister's Poker Room
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17th April 2004, 10:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.