I see a New Rival casino was born RubyRoyal
![]() |
![]() |
I see a New Rival casino was born RubyRoyal
Nice looking homepage but the SUB is sticky and has a WR of 50x.
Cheers Balky
Got spammed by them (or some of their affiliate) already.
I think Ill pass.
Players should be happy with this classic BONNE CHANCE term.
NO DOCS REQUIRED FOR WITHDRAWLS TO BE PAID
Still pitching a perfect game, seventh inning stretch
John, I've memorized your apologetic replies ((would be imposssible to not have)) so don't sweat it, word is, we'll get your reply posted
Is there a smilie for shooting the smart ass messenger??![]()
And no you will not be paid any amount greater than the maximum daily, weekly withdrawal limits when you submit the still required security documents per CS so no barking up that tree...............The word "not" is just the usual RIVAL skin eff up![]()
Here ya go Nash...
Interesting read over at AGD btw.....thanks for the link. I especially enjoyed the part where the info on HOW bonus "abusers" are weeded out by Rival....was offered to any affiliates willing to meet face to face, or talk on the phone ie. what goes on behind the scenes. Too bad the players (who actually pay the salaries), aren't offered the same courtesy, and privy to that info. Nope, just bonus ban em with zero explanation.
And the explanation of why progressive wins can't be paid out in one lump sum? Cause funds have to be gathered from all over the place/different processors. Oh, and other softwares have had casinos go belly up because of big jackpot wins. Ummm, not if the progressive funds are kept aside and separate as they are supposed to be. Not used as operating capital.
Again, thanks for the link. Yeah, online gaming needs another Rival casino.
Attn: New Members! Make sure to check out the "Casinomeister Accredited Casinos" and the "Spot The Rogue" section of the main site here before jumping into "Online Casinos" with no information or knowledge behind you!
dcpam39 (9th August 2009), KasinoKing (9th August 2009), NASHVEGAS (9th August 2009), RobWin (9th August 2009), silkprint (15th August 2009), triple777s (15th August 2009)
Pinababy69 (9th August 2009)
Rob, I didn't want to mention names...but I thought you were awesome in that thread. I thought you were diplomatic, and you asked all the right questions. To be brutally honest, I didn't expect it from you, given the fact of how heavily you promote Rival yourself. But really....I didn't think you were out of line, nor did you show any disrespect to anyone. I still don't get what's wrong with asking questions...and why it was thrown back at you with such an attitude. It was eye opening to say the least. Thanks for trying...because we don't seem to get too many answers over here at CM ie. The Devil's Playground.![]()
Attn: New Members! Make sure to check out the "Casinomeister Accredited Casinos" and the "Spot The Rogue" section of the main site here before jumping into "Online Casinos" with no information or knowledge behind you!
bryand (11th August 2009), GGW Laurie (9th August 2009), NASHVEGAS (9th August 2009), RobWin (9th August 2009), triple777s (15th August 2009)
I could disect it but the most important significance imo (and sense of vindication) is the affiliate community even if just for a moment in time is catching on to his song and dance.
Yes, I realize the impetus for most of the affiliates catching on. That said, I am just glad to see that some members of the affiliate community are attempting to get Rival Gaming to shape up or ship out!!
Thanks for saying that Pina. I never did understand the attitude part either. I think I finally said something to the effect of the guy sounding totally stressed out or something like that. Oh well.
I have always and still do believe that casinos and programs and certain issues definitely need to sometimes be taken to task with the rep(s). I figure as long as I can try and maintain a constructive balance between promoting them while at the same time taking certain issues to task with them is a fair balance or at least an attempt at it.
I'm not trying to plug here but I would always go to battle for the players first in probably 98% of issues, even those that did not sign-up thru me at my site. But still, I want to try to keep a good balance too and pick the issues that I'm going to battle on carefully. Hope that makes sense..![]()
hippo925 (9th August 2009), NASHVEGAS (9th August 2009), Pinababy69 (9th August 2009)
Bookmarks