|
|||
|
|||||||
| Register | All Albums | Member Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Event Calendar | Mark Forums Read | |
| Main Site | CM Casinos | CM Poker | I-Gaming Forum Reps | Rogue Pit | Webcast | Bitchin' Newsletter | News |
| Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues Complaints concerning operational issues, fraud, non-payment, spammers, evil operators and players etc., are to be posted here |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
So, you click double. The dealer deals himself a card - let's say it's a Ten, and then it deals you a card, let's say the King of spades. It then deals three more cards. It then displays its ten, and four face-down cards. Whichever card you click on will be displayed as the King of spades. If you clicked card one, King of Spades. Card three, king of spades. The other three cards (the ones you didnt click on) will show as the other three that were dealt, and which never made any difference. If you don't click on anything - let's say you just closed the casino - it won't matter, because your balance will change the moment you click double, because the server already knows that the dealer has a ten and you have a king so you won in this example. The card choice is just window dressing. Deceptive it may be, but it really makes no difference to anything whatsoever. It's like saying a coin flip uses a 20p when actually it's a 50p. Who cares? |
| The Following User Says Thank You to TheBloke For This Useful Post: | ||
1819 (6th August 2006) | ||
|
||||
|
This is quite shocking to me. Call it deceptive, call it a way to speed up the game, this is in fact rigging. Whether or not it affects the payout percentages, the player is presented with a situation where it is believed his decision can alter the end result. This is cleary stated in the rules as pointed out in previous posts. If the players actions have 0 result on the outcome, MG is misrepresenting the game and it is lying to its players.
What about the red/black/suit doubling on the MG slot games? Is it set up the same way where the software decides whether or not you've won before making a choice? I too would like to know more about the doubling feature of land based machines. I've seen guys go from ectasy to agony when the game presents a 3 and then the poor guy "picks" a 2 and loses his $400 double. Now, at the very least, he is in a sour mood the rest of the evening...People can cause themself a lot of grief thinking their wrong action cost them a lot of money, when in fact they might not have had any impact on the result... If anyone knows how these machines work, please speak up! |
| The Following User Says Thank You to kingkong098 For This Useful Post: | ||
The Watchdog (6th August 2006) | ||
|
||||
|
I can't understand the fuss here.
Players must realise that they are gambling against a random number generator, no matter how the casino cares to present the game. You are not gambling against a real deck of cards! As long as the players expectation is the same, which it is, what does it matter? If it speeds the game up, good, I am in favour of it. Should players use this double up feature? Of course they should, it is one of the few situations in which the casino does not have any edge. And if doubling happens to count towards WR, then it is a no brainer. Mitch |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I don't know - in turn I'm a bit suprised that people think it's fine for a casino to be wasting players' time offering an apparent choice of cards when they've already chosen for you. MG have been caught out here lying and doing something they'd never have admitted to otherwise. Of course I'm aware there's an RNG - but with card games there's no good reason why the RNG shouldn't just be used to generate cards - then the logic of the game rules decides if I win or lose. Any deviation from that's a slippery slope. Some bright programmer might conclude there's no point wasting time transmitting data for the whole rigmarole of a game when they can just decide wins/losses/pushes in a split second and then have the software on your PC locally make up some cards - regardless of what it does to game strategy. Or decide to weight all results so they conform to the house edge over time, but have more variation in the short term... and so on.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
For me the whole concept is moronic. Why would you play on a double game, where picking your card is just a freaking thing made up for enjoyment? When I pick a card, and the others show, I like to think: DAMN.. WHY DIDN'T I PICKED THE OTHER ONE?? and not to think that my fate was already set when I hit the double feature... |
|
|||||
|
Further more...
The whole issue kept me all night long thinking about it.
A little research has made me come up with other stuff.... Most Microgaming casinos allow video poker as valid games for their bonuses... mmmm would this be due to the topic on this thread?? Since the double feature is already set and there is no chance of luck to increase your winnings, so its fine to keep it as a valid. On the other hand... Several Playtech Casinos have Video Poker as invalid games... Would it be possible that this game is invalid due to the fact the the doulbe option in Playtech is not configured as in Microgaming?? Have you played Video Poker on Playtech and noticed how easy is to increase your balance on a lucky round of doubling in Jacks or Better?? This is a thread we're I would really like The Meister, The Wiz and people from different software developers make comments.... The whole issue has shocked me... At this moment, if I were a Microgaming regular VP player I will hold back my gaming for a sec and see what happens.... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
I agree this could hardly be called rigging. Deceptive - yes, but not to the degree of the HI/LO game from Intercasino just discussed here
What surprises me though is how MG can make such an idiotic mistake in programming the interface - in showing the result before the visual representation of the coinflip has been shown. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
If I found that I had played heads or tails, and my choice of 'heads' or 'tails' was ignored and instead my win was always tested against 'heads', I wouldn't give a toss (ha ha). So long as a real coin was still used, it wouldn't matter. I admit I'd regard it as odd - as I do with this situation - but nothing more. Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PR: Microgaming Consolidation | Casinomeister | Casino Industry Discussion | 2 | 8th May 2006 06:32 PM |
| Reputable Casinos link above | Limewire87 | Online Casinos | 3 | 2nd August 2004 09:24 PM |
Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Slots Guide |
Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews
| Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Online Slots |
Online Casino Reviews
Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.