GoWild don"t pay 3600€

**rainmaker** · 8th November 2011, 03:16 AM

.

I do not think that GoWild will be tried for a new Baptism period now. GoWild wrote this in March (in their Baptism thread on this forum):

Bonus abuse will not be tolerated by the casino management, any decision in that matter is final

They later changed their official view on this (after pressure) but I think that Casinomeister will be very cautious about GoWild in the the near future since this case is so closely connected to their previous problems. As I said earlier in this thread, we have not seen any other new cases in this forum where they have practiced a in the spirit policy, but I can understand that Casinomeister doesn't want to recommend them again until it is 100% certain that they have quite this bullshit. But it may look like the current GoWild management simply don`t get it.

**Silencio** · 9th November 2011, 02:24 PM

wow, indeed nice one cm..
quote self:

1st September 2011, 06:51 PM
Thread: 32red very dissapointed
by Silencio
Hey man don't you go there...
comparing 32red to gowild
tsssh

I'm still in denial about them being accredited..

I'll end my comment now cause it's not nice to kick people when they're down.

**same_old** · 9th November 2011, 03:50 PM

WOW!!

Bryans latest thread speak volumes on how much he cares about his members.

This is a perfect example of him looking after us as players. You can tell he thought about this one for a while and was a hard decision to make. On one end you have this casino that pays on time without any hassles (prior to this thread and to my Knowledge) They have a regular rep here who is always trying to help where she can and they offer great comps to most players. They do go above and beyond alot of MG casinos and were headed into the likes of 32RED status but this has now taken them down a few pegs.

Alot of positives do weigh up for this place but due to this recent thread Bryan cannot overlook the fact of "spirit of the bonus" fiasco has now become part of GOWILDS MO.
He only recently done a video cast on this exact thing so he was pushed into a corner so to speak and has acted above and beyond the call of duty.

personally, I am still going to play there as I'm sure other existing members will too but of course we will always have one eye open and make sure to document all our playtime etc.
Luckily I do not fit the "bonus abuser" character. What ever that is!!

I'm sure GOWILD are upset with the outcome but all business have set backs and I'm sure an overhaul of the terms and conditions will still be looked at.

I still think it would be good for Casino's to give cases like this to Bryan and or Max to assist with before it becomes a complaint.

Why can't a casino say "Hey Bryan, we have had this person sign up use the welcome bonus played like this and we are leaning towards not paying him for these reasons"
Casinomeister would give there input on the matter and possibly go to the extent of helping them to lay out bonuses.

It looks like when you buy into a MG franchise you are also handed the "bonus abuser 101 booklet". Sorry guys but it's way outdated and needs an overhaul big time.

My two Cents,

Same_old

P.S- I just re-read over some posts and I do see that had prior issues to not paying out on the same grounds, please accept my apologies.

**Marie2473** · 9th November 2011, 05:40 PM

Originally Posted by hakapuku

Casinomeister, although I consider your decision to be fair, I am afraid of some bad consequences of that decision. At the time Gowild was accredited at your website they tried to keep their reputation high. But now- after being thrown away from the accredited list- will not they go the rogue way? And if next time they don't pay somebody- will you be able to help that person? So I think GoWild should be left accredited- because they paid eventually.

I disagree.. casinos are not on the accredited list to NOT go the rouge way, they are on there because they are trustworthy no matter what and deserves to be there!

**LaHutti** · 10th November 2011, 06:38 PM

Originally Posted by Marie2473

I disagree.. casinos are not on the accredited list to NOT go the rouge way, they are on there because they are trustworthy no matter what and deserves to be there!

Very well said Marie.
Very well handled case Bryan

**skyestar40** · 12th November 2011, 02:14 PM

I don't post much as my spelling is bad and if i make a mistake i get embarrassed,yes spell check is good but for me its hard like eg meet and meat,but im glad about Go Wild being in the pit as i have had so many bad thing happen to me at Go Wild,but can not post because of my spelling.It takes me so long to post a message,so most of the time i just let it go.

I am so glad they have been found out,and love this place and people who look after each other.Thank you all for caring about others and for Bryan for looking after everyone,you are the best.

**trade** · 12th November 2011, 02:36 PM

Originally Posted by Casinomeister

Hi All,

After careful consideration, I've decided to remove GoWild from the Accredited Casino section. Yes, I understand that the player was eventually paid, but this does not erase the fact that the casino management attempted to confiscate the player's winnings via "bonus abuse" jargon. Like many have pointed out in this thread, this behavior by the casino administration is alarming and not acceptable whatsoever. Personally, I am dumbfounded that any manager would even let the phrase "you abused our bonus" pass his lips. This is clearly a "Spirit of the Bonus" issue, and many casinos are failing to see that there are no bonus abusers - just badly written bonuses.

If casinos are going to use bonuses to cater to player greed, then they need to toe the line just as the players do.

GoWild had a history of negating winnings because of bonus abuse, and when they came on board in February this year, I thought they had this squared away. It was posted here last Spring that things were changing. Unfortunately someone didn't get the memo.

Even though the casino reps are great reps in this forum, I don't feel comfortable recommending this casino any longer. Thus they are off the site.

Thanks Bryan,
I noticed you missed removing the accreditation of GoWild from this link: http://www.casinomeister.com/microgaming.php
Just a heads up!

**trade** · 21st November 2011, 04:24 AM

Originally Posted by trade

Thanks Bryan,
I noticed you missed removing the accreditation of GoWild from this link: http://www.casinomeister.com/microgaming.php
Just a heads up!

I noticed that the GoWild status has been downgraded on the link I mentioned above. I now wonder, for newer players, what the perception of "accredited" vs. the downgraded "Good to go" is perceived. Actually, I am also wondering those casinos listed as "good to go" might mean to me or other players... should we anticipate possible problems?
Thanks!!

**sandykauf** · 21st November 2011, 07:59 AM

This casino should be listed as "proceed with caution". They should not be able to become accredited again. They were dishonest and did not act with integrity...call a spade a spade.