Well, iNetBet CS indicated that if you carried on playing the correct game, you would be OK. It was only when you cashed out that you found out CS had not been entirely "helpful" in their over-brief reply.
Management at Slotastic may end up overruling what CS told you, and void the winnings when you attempt to withdraw.
In terms of WHICH slot you played though, there is NO advantage in playing the "wrong" one - they are ALL THE SAME apart from the "eye candy" on offer. This is making the rules tighter than they need to be, and is "rules for rules sake", rather than rules designed for a purpose (such as preventing Blackjack, rather than slots, being used to meet WR to the advantage of the player).
If Slotastic DO decide to "let it go" and pay if you make WR on the featured game, even though you have won on games that were not included, it proves that they are a less risky place to play then iNetBet when it comes to players making minor mistakes that do not give them any advantage.
It is a trap casinos have made for themselves. There is no need to make terms complicated purely for the sake of it. They should make sure an extra restriction is NECESSARY to prevent "advantage play", rather than having it there just to make things "more interesting".
"more interesting" can sometimes look like "deliberate intention to set trap" from the players' point of view.
We need to get back to basics, get the terms as simple as possible, and accept that slots are slots, and it doesn't matter WHICH ones are played with a slots bonus, they are all RANDOM, and DON'T "save up losses to make a balancing payout in the end" as quite a few players believe.
Where there is no logic in a rule, players will look for a reason WHY the rule has been considered NECESSARY. In the case of RTG, one might think that they offer a slots bonus, and restrict it to ONLY the slots they have set down to 91% the day before
This rule then becomes LOGICAL, because playing the slots NOT set to 91% with it DOES give the player an advantage, which would constitute "advantage play".
Recently, someone appeared to question my statement that "some casinos are now restricting which slots can be played with a slots bonus".
Well, here is the PROOF of this, and it is quite common in some casinos.
iNetBet frequently offer slots bonuses that can ONLY be used on a small number of slots, rather than all of them, and even go as far as to confiscate winnings from play on the others, rather than just letting it not count towards playthrough.
The worst I have seen with Microgaming is to ban PROGRESSIVE slots from being played with a slots bonus. This was the norm at 32Red for many years.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by pokerdan
Bookmarks