WinPalace bonus T&C - Mistake or not?

**funeral979** · 21st August 2010, 07:45 AM

Originally Posted by MommyMachine

I agree with winbig...Why not just say 100x wagering period?

Because its only 100x wagering if you play blackjack only. With this bonus you can play more than just blackjack. For players who like to mix it up, and play slots and blackjack, it makes more sense this way.

**winbig** · 21st August 2010, 06:58 PM

Originally Posted by funeral979

Because its only 100x wagering if you play blackjack only. With this bonus you can play more than just blackjack. For players who like to mix it up, and play slots and blackjack, it makes more sense this way.

I give up. Have fun with the thread.

**kingkong098** · 25th August 2010, 04:57 AM

Originally Posted by danielg

.
Besides, these promotions are active for half a year without any complaints, which i think proves that it is clearly stated.
Kind regards,
Daniel

ummm, not entirely true....Same situation, just replace BJ with Table Games.

http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...tml#post352804

Even if these kinds of terms are listed in the same paragraph as in my example below, it's deceptive on the part of the casino...

100% Blackjack bonus 25xWR*
*25xwr applicable to slots, blackjack counts 1/4.

Either its a blackjack bonus @ 25x or don't advertise it as a blackjack bonus.

**danielg** · 28th August 2010, 01:32 PM

Originally Posted by kingkong098

ummm, not entirely true....Same situation, just replace BJ with Table Games.

Kingkong,

There is a big difference between the bonus from that post you show (which was immediately changed btw) to the current one.

Here is the screen shot of the inner wagering for the Blackjack bonus. Check the amount of games that count on 1:1 basis.

The other thing is that you cannot see the WR without seeing the WR per specific games. It's right there.
WR BJ.png

**winbig** · 28th August 2010, 05:39 PM

Originally Posted by danielg

Kingkong,

There is a big difference between the bonus from that post you show (which was immediately changed btw) to the current one.

Here is the screen shot of the inner wagering for the Blackjack bonus. Check the amount of games that count on 1:1 basis.

The other thing is that you cannot see the WR without seeing the WR per specific games. It's right there.
WR BJ.png

Going by that SS, BJ counts for .25 wagering for a BJ bonus, but 7 Stud Poker and Bonus Bingo count 100%?

**racefanrob** · 28th August 2010, 05:54 PM

I'm with Daniel on this one.

While it may be subtly deceptive to call it a BJ bonus, the terms are pretty clear and I have no problem understanding them. I don't think that the OP had a decieved moment either as he read the terms they seemed extreme to him but he understood them well before he deposited. I think these terms are fine. I might not like 100x if I only play bj. If that is the case I wont play it. They are not decieving though.

**winbig** · 28th August 2010, 09:21 PM

Originally Posted by racefanrob

I'm with Daniel on this one.

While it may be subtly deceptive to call it a BJ bonus, the terms are pretty clear and I have no problem understanding them. I don't think that the OP had a decieved moment either as he read the terms they seemed extreme to him but he understood them well before he deposited. I think these terms are fine. I might not like 100x if I only play bj. If that is the case I wont play it. They are not decieving though.

Did I ever say deceiving? If so, my bad, but if not, then don't say what I didn't

I think I made my point clear - the 25% term is way too easy to skip over, even for seasoned players. If the WR for a game-specific bonus are 100x, then by all means put 100x there, don't include some term that the specific game only counts 1/4 of the WR.

If you want to have an all games bonus, then sure, advertise 25x WR for all slots, then list each game separately with their corresponding weights.

**racefanrob** · 29th August 2010, 03:41 AM

Originally Posted by winbig

Did I ever say deceiving? If so, my bad, but if not, then don't say what I didn't

I think I made my point clear - the 25% term is way too easy to skip over, even for seasoned players. If the WR for a game-specific bonus are 100x, then by all means put 100x there, don't include some term that the specific game only counts 1/4 of the WR.

If you want to have an all games bonus, then sure, advertise 25x WR for all slots, then list each game separately with their corresponding weights.

Did I say that you said deceiving? If so, my bad, but if not then don't say what I didn't

I think you made your point clear also. Crystal clear. I obviously didn't make my point clear enough and that point is that I subtly disagree with you and I mostly do agree with Daniel on this specific matter. mmmk?

You are correct for the most part and our opinions are largely the same here but I don't find it to be a big deal.