But why is it a bonus abuse is my point, where is this explained? its just assumed by some to be bonus abuse, but why?
the clause is there that says a player may loose winnings from "bonus abuse"
but does not explain what is deemed to be abuse, it seems its up to the casino to decide, but there arent any ground rules in the first place, in this case it seems to be make it up as we go along.
And its so easy to avoid this and many other arguments that come up with bonuses, the software can be set to not let this happen.
Like another issue with bonuses in this section where a player played blackjack on a slots bonus , would'nt it make sense that the software only allowed the player to play slots while he is on that bonus.
would save a few arguements, the casino's obviously benefit more from the way it is otherwise the software would automatically prevent this abuse.
Club world Did handle my situation very well and the CS helped to the best of her ability, but the casino management and software providers can obviously to more to avoid any of these issues in the first place.
I rarely use bonuses because of the mess they can be, but i also believe that if their software stuffed up then yes i deserve some sort of compensation, to pushy? these guys get enough money when the software is working right let alone when its not performing right and they acknowledge that.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks