This same stunt was pulled by a Playtech casino, and they got away with it
They have an unclear term, but are interpreting the rules in the most negative way possible in order to extract more playthrough.
One you meet the terms, the funds do indeed become yours. If they want to have a restriction carried over to when the funds have been converted and can be withdrawn, this must be SPECIFICALLY indicated in the terms. It is not good enough for them to say they can do something because the terms don't say that the cannot. It doesn't work that way for players. Many players have argued that there is nothing in the terms to say they cannot do something, and casinos then pull the "F U Clause" as a means to enforce an unwritten rule.
If this is Mainstreet, there have been other complaints about them, which indicate a steady decline in standards, but they have not offended enough to lose their accredited status, which is why a PAB should be filed and the matter investigated.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks