Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > Online Casino and Poker Complaints > Casino Complaints - Bonus Issues

Notices

Casino Complaints - Bonus Issues Complaints concerning bonuses are to be posted here

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 10th September 2006, 12:27 AM
frufrugirl's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 476
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 374
Thanked 154 Times in 111 Posts
Reputation Points: 797
Rep Power: 14
frufrugirl is a splendid one to beholdfrufrugirl is a splendid one to beholdfrufrugirl is a splendid one to beholdfrufrugirl is a splendid one to beholdfrufrugirl is a splendid one to beholdfrufrugirl is a splendid one to beholdfrufrugirl is a splendid one to behold
AMEN!!
__________________
Bad girl! No No!
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 10th September 2006, 09:23 AM
jetset's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,207
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 798
Thanked 2,672 Times in 1,298 Posts
Reputation Points: 14287
Rep Power: 153
jetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond repute
This is increasingly beginning to look as if it is a casino management screw-up in offering a too-generous promo (other recent examples are the clowns at Joyland and the now dead Winners Only)

That's bad, but retrievable from a casino viewpoint if they pay everyone who signed up under the original T&Cs offered, and then change those T&Cs for other players going forward. The fact that they admit the promo was *misunderstood* by other players shows that they know they screwed up.

However, like Joyland et al this management takes the low road (why am I not surprised by that after their underhand tricks to get players to spam other players?) The management makes a retroactive change to the T&Cs, and then thinks it can get out from under by simply disqualifying everyone's winnings and returning only their deposits instead of meeting their fair obligations.

This is, in my view, rogue behaviour and players need to be warned about it.
__________________
jetset
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jetset For This Useful Post:
sharpfool (11th September 2006)
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 11th September 2006, 11:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Online
Posts: 20
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Reputation Points: 17
Rep Power: 9
backjlack is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetset View Post
That's bad, but retrievable from a casino viewpoint if they pay everyone who signed up under the original T&Cs offered, and then change those T&Cs for other players going forward.
Of course, it's retriveable. Most people's reaction when I posted my win was that Brandy is a trustworthy place. It's not too late for them to correct the situation and show that they can be trusted.

Meanwhile, I submitted my pitch-a-bitch form a few days ago. I hope Brian will be able to help.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 15th September 2006, 12:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Online
Posts: 20
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Reputation Points: 17
Rep Power: 9
backjlack is on a distinguished road
There seems to be an openness to discussion coming from Brandy manager Lisa, but there has been no notable development. She still hasn't adressed the many holes in what has been their position so far.

Lisa declined my inviation to explain her views in this thread because Brandy's T&C don't allow staff to participate in any other forum than their own. So basically, I am still awaiting an explanation of Brandy's position, either via an email to me or through Brandy's forum.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 15th September 2006, 04:58 AM
chuchu59's Avatar
gambling maniac
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
Posts: 2,402
WTGs: 9
WTGd at 8 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 411
Thanked 1,018 Times in 608 Posts
Reputation Points: 5605
Rep Power: 56
chuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by backjlack View Post
There seems to be an openness to discussion coming from Brandy manager Lisa, but there has been no notable development. She still hasn't adressed the many holes in what has been their position so far.

Lisa declined my inviation to explain her views in this thread because Brandy's T&C don't allow staff to participate in any other forum than their own. So basically, I am still awaiting an explanation of Brandy's position, either via an email to me or through Brandy's forum.
You mean OGF. There is no way you can have your say there given the numerous pro-brandy supporters.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 15th September 2006, 07:06 AM
jetset's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,207
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 798
Thanked 2,672 Times in 1,298 Posts
Reputation Points: 14287
Rep Power: 153
jetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond repute
"Lisa declined my inviation to explain her views in this thread because Brandy's T&C don't allow staff to participate in any other forum than their own."

You have to laugh at the sheer hypocrisy of this statement. It comes from a company that ran competitions whereby it's members were rewarded on the amount of *creative* spam they could dump on other people's fora!!!
__________________
jetset
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jetset For This Useful Post:
johnsteed (16th September 2006), swampwitch (11th October 2006)
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 25th September 2006, 11:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Online
Posts: 20
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Reputation Points: 17
Rep Power: 9
backjlack is on a distinguished road
Manager Lisa Evans at first game me the impression that she was willing to have an open discussion, but it isn't the case.

Here are the facts that I submitted to Lisa's attention and which she has entirely failed to address :

1- The fact that Brandy's refusal to pay my winnings is based on a quote that isn't and wasn't part of the terms and contions of the 'Test Drive x 10' promotion.

2- The fact that Brandy's staff were well aware that I had opened multiple 'Test Drive by 10' accounts, and that they welcomed me to open more.

2- The fact that these special accounts were created (and bonuses put in them for me to play with) by Brandy staff with during the course of FOUR days, and that it is only on the day after I signaled my win to Brandy that Brandy's practical interpretation of their own rules suddenly changed : my winning was denied, 'Test Drive X 10' deposits were suddenly refunded.


I have tried very hard to get Lisa to address these three points but my efforts were vain.

Instead of adressing my difficult-to-answer arguments, Lisa invited me to submit my questions to Brandy's forum instead. I told her that I didn't feel comfortable to post in Brandy's forum because it is not moderated by a third-party. Also I don't see the point in this since SHE is the manager and Brandy's forum postings are answered by a subordinate.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 10th October 2006, 09:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cyberland
Posts: 17
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Reputation Points: 50
Rep Power: 20
fredb has been spending a lot of time in the forum
Brandy

Anything new with your Brandy complaint, backjack?

Last edited by fredb; 10th October 2006 at 09:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 13th October 2006, 03:00 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 11
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Reputation Points: 27
Rep Power: 0
sancho is on a distinguished road
backjlack, have you received/noticed this month's Brandy Casino newsletter? It mentions a player named Wladimir N. who they claim has violated the rules by opening 'several similar 20TD accounts'. I suppose this must be you.


I also played the Test Drive x 10 more than once and I was really shocked when I saw in the newsletter that someone had their 19k + winnings denied on this basis.

Here is what happened to me :

I opened a number of Test Drive accounts, just like you, and just like you I felt welcomed to open additional accounts until at one point, instead of receiving a new username/password combination, I received an email telling me that I violated the rules. This got me very angry and I replied that there was no rule saying that the promo was limited to one account of each kind. I explained that I deeply resented their accusations. The interesting part is their reply : they replied that they were in no way blaming me for violating the rules. That the part about the accounts being limited to one of each kind had not been included in the rules by mistake and that as a consequence I couldn't have been aware of said rule.

I think this shows very clearly that they know that they have no ground for accusing players of violation of a rule that was omitted by a 'negligence' of theirs. Unfortunately, they only recognized their mistake where it cost them little (me), but not where it cost the a lot (you).

What they're doing doesn't make any sense. It's completely dishonest.

Hope it helps.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sancho For This Useful Post:
backjlack (18th October 2006)
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 13th October 2006, 09:29 AM
chuchu59's Avatar
gambling maniac
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
Posts: 2,402
WTGs: 9
WTGd at 8 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 411
Thanked 1,018 Times in 608 Posts
Reputation Points: 5605
Rep Power: 56
chuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond repute
Just to let everybody know that it seems that the moderator of Online Gambling Forums, which is Brandy's so-called official forum, has deserted the site and it's now being spammed by the worst of spammers with nobody taking any action for the past 2 weeks. Does that mean that something is going to happen to this casino? Beware!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chuchu59 For This Useful Post:
backjlack (18th October 2006)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bet Royal Cashout Problems Thremp Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues 31 1st November 2007 07:13 AM
Royal Vegas/Prima Poker accusation of collusion POlka78 Poker Complaints 11 23rd August 2006 07:12 PM
Experience of 100free Spins by Royal Vegas Casino tiger2006 Online Casinos 24 29th May 2006 12:55 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2008


  Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews | Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Winneronline | Online Casinos| Online Slots | Online Casino Reviews

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.

Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk