|
|||
|
|||||||
| Register | All Albums | Member Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Mark Forums Read | |||
| Main Site | CM Casinos | CM Poker | I-Gaming Forum Reps | Rogue Pit | Webcast | Bitchin' Newsletter | News |
| Notices |
| Casino Complaints - Bonus Issues Complaints concerning bonuses are to be posted here |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
About the quotes from Brandy's forum.
Concerning the quotes from Brandy's forum, both in original english and translated from russian, I would like to underline one thing :
Both these questions and answers are dated from Sept.5, which is THE DAY AFTER I hit my Royal Flush and emailed them to cash it out. This in no way infirms the 'scenario' according to which they were letting people open multiple account until a big win woke them up and prompted a switch to 'damage control' mode. One could even imagine that these questions and answers were planted there by Brandy, but of course this is pure (very far-fetched) speculation. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
What a stupid quote "Brandy mails good news only". If so, send this player a mail congratulating him on his RF win and that he will be paid within 24 hours and then spread the news (especially OGF). That will really be mailing good news only. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Players who are over 18, but under 21 have had winnings confiscated at Grand Prive and Casino Extreme. Past deposits were accepted and small cashouts had even been paid. But once a large win was made, the casino decided to invoke the "must be of legal gambling age in your state" clause. They could easily have checked on this when the players signed up, but instead waited until the player tried to make a substantial cash out. If you try to claim a bonus in the group that rhymes with Boloplex, when you have a locked account somewhere else in their group, they'll happily accept your deposit and hope you lose it. If you try to cashout, only then do they inform you that your winnings are void. They could easily do a check on signup, but that would be less profitable. I personally think that if a casino denies payment based on information that they had prior to accepting the players wagers, then that casino should be immediately rogued. The correct action is to deny the wager before it takes place. However, the two aforementioned cases clearly show that this isn't the general consensus here. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
a "rouge" coloured brandy
welcome to the rouges, brandy!
__________________
++++ http://badtennisballs.ytmnd.com/ ++++ |
|
|||
|
Brandy quotes made-up rules to deny payment of my winnings.
Yesterday (Sept. 8), I finally received a reply from Brandy's manager Lisa.
To justify Brandy's refusal to pay me she quotes rules that weren't (and still aren't) part of the terms and conditions. Quote:
Lisa also completely fails to address the fact that I was explicitly made welcome to open more than one account on the days when I played. I'm just realizing that there is an important detail I forgot to mention previously : I played this promo in the course of FOUR separate days (Sept. 1, 2, 3 and 4), which implies : 1 - That I wasn't trying to 'slip under the radar' or anything of the sort. 2 - That they had plenty of time to react, unless, of course, they were quite happy with my playing again and again up until the moment I won. Last edited by Simmo!; 14th November 2006 at 08:13 PM. Reason: removed quotes upon request |
|
||||
|
Brandy have no legitimate excuse not to pay you. They accepted your deposit and let you play several times.
If they insist on not paying you then they are no better than the worst online casinos out there and I hope the word gets out and it costs them 100 x the $20000. This industry is 10 years old and still we see this BS all the time.
__________________
aka thatsBAD |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bet Royal Cashout Problems | Thremp | Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues | 31 | 1st November 2007 07:13 AM |
| Royal Vegas/Prima Poker accusation of collusion | POlka78 | Poker Complaints | 11 | 23rd August 2006 07:12 PM |
| Experience of 100free Spins by Royal Vegas Casino | tiger2006 | Online Casinos | 24 | 29th May 2006 12:55 AM |
Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews
| Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Winneronline | Online Casinos| Online Slots |
Online Casino Reviews
Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.