Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > Online Casino and Poker Complaints > Casino Complaints - Bonus Issues

Notices

Casino Complaints - Bonus Issues Complaints concerning bonuses are to be posted here

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 7th September 2006, 04:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Online
Posts: 20
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Reputation Points: 17
Rep Power: 10
backjlack is on a distinguished road
About the quotes from Brandy's forum.

Concerning the quotes from Brandy's forum, both in original english and translated from russian, I would like to underline one thing :

Both these questions and answers are dated from Sept.5, which is THE DAY AFTER I hit my Royal Flush and emailed them to cash it out.

This in no way infirms the 'scenario' according to which they were letting people open multiple account until a big win woke them up and prompted a switch to 'damage control' mode.

One could even imagine that these questions and answers were planted there by Brandy, but of course this is pure (very far-fetched) speculation.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 7th September 2006, 08:55 AM
Vesuvio's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,028
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 55
Thanked 191 Times in 97 Posts
Reputation Points: 1212
Rep Power: 30
Vesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by HateMG View Post
Let me translate you some quotes from russian forum:
I might have been unclear, but I read and understood the Russian My point was that if people were asking the question on the forum, or making the same "mistake", it's obvious that the terms weren't clear. And anyone reading the terms can clearly see there's nothing there about not taking up this offer as many times as you like.

As backjlack says, a post on a forum two days ago doesn't alter the rules for players who played before then. It's also doubtful it alters them for players playing afterwards, though if this is only advertised on the forum and not through e-mail (a weird way to conduct your affairs!), perhaps it does.

*perhaps you weren't trying to make a point about the rules & were just providing a translation for others - in which case, apologies & thanks!

Last edited by Vesuvio; 7th September 2006 at 09:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 7th September 2006, 10:19 AM
chuchu59's Avatar
gambling maniac
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
Posts: 2,611
WTGs: 19
WTGd at 10 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 513
Thanked 1,201 Times in 699 Posts
Reputation Points: 6520
Rep Power: 62
chuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by backjlack View Post
Vesuvio, I opened a seperate thread because I was so happy and I felt like sharing my joy.

But my joy is gone now, because I just learned that Brandy is refusing to pay me!



They have this promotion this month called 'Test Drive x 10' where you send them 20$ through a web form and they open you an account (seperate from your main one) with 200$ in it. The catch is that you must reach a 19000$ balance before you can cash out. They also offer '2/20/reach 2000' and '200/2000/reach 180k' accounts.

From reading the terms, there was no doubt in my mind that this was available on more than one deposit. So I did make a 20$ deposit, got a 200$ account, lost, did it again, many times (25, I believe), until I hit the Royal Flush. After hitting the Royal Flush I emailed them, asking them to cashout my winnings (the cashier module is not available in those special accounts).

According to the rules of the promotion, I was supposed to be paid in 24 hours so, today, not having received my winnings, I emailed to inquire about my payment and the answer I just received is that they are not going to pay me because I broke the rules of the promotion by having multiple bonus accounts. They say that the rules state that only one account of each type is allowed per customer, which is not true. The rules don't say anything explicit like that at all.

Here are the rules :




Not only is there no clear mention that only one bonus of each kind is allowed, but here is was they emailed me in answer to my sending the second 20$ deposit :





This shows that they were perfectly aware that they were creating multiple accounts. For me, it was a clear confirmation that they were welcoming more deposits. The emails containing each new account's username and password were signed by a number of different people, and they all took a different time to arrive so they weren't automatic emails, they were manually processed.

Brandy was willingly running this promo as repeatable apparently until they realized that it was getting out of hand (perhaps there were

other big winners, perhaps even a 180k winner) and they decided to back off.


Brandy has willingly accepted to open these account for me. All the time I was playing, every sign convinced me that I was doing exactly what was intended by this promotion. And now, they pay back my 500$ in deposits and act like this is the end of it.
Well, either you have e-mailed to them for the promo 25 times or they credited $2000 to accounts in your name 25 times. Whichever is true, the casino must have known and were willing to let you use the promo over and over so they must abide by their promise and pay the winnings.

What a stupid quote "Brandy mails good news only". If so, send this player a mail congratulating him on his RF win and that he will be paid within 24 hours and then spread the news (especially OGF). That will really be mailing good news only.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 7th September 2006, 04:10 PM
bpb bpb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Haverhill
Posts: 405
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2
Thanked 79 Times in 36 Posts
Reputation Points: 493
Rep Power: 22
bpb is a glorious beacon of lightbpb is a glorious beacon of lightbpb is a glorious beacon of lightbpb is a glorious beacon of lightbpb is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuchu59 View Post
Well, either you have e-mailed to them for the promo 25 times or they credited $2000 to accounts in your name 25 times. Whichever is true, the casino must have known and were willing to let you use the promo over and over so they must abide by their promise and pay the winnings.
Casinos freeroll against their players all the time, and the precident has been set that this is acceptable.

Players who are over 18, but under 21 have had winnings confiscated at Grand Prive and Casino Extreme. Past deposits were accepted and small cashouts had even been paid. But once a large win was made, the casino decided to invoke the "must be of legal gambling age in your state" clause. They could easily have checked on this when the players signed up, but instead waited until the player tried to make a substantial cash out.

If you try to claim a bonus in the group that rhymes with Boloplex, when you have a locked account somewhere else in their group, they'll happily accept your deposit and hope you lose it. If you try to cashout, only then do they inform you that your winnings are void. They could easily do a check on signup, but that would be less profitable.


I personally think that if a casino denies payment based on information that they had prior to accepting the players wagers, then that casino should be immediately rogued. The correct action is to deny the wager before it takes place. However, the two aforementioned cases clearly show that this isn't the general consensus here.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 7th September 2006, 04:15 PM
hbears341's Avatar
Unlucky for life
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 313
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 44
Thanked 78 Times in 52 Posts
Reputation Points: 408
Rep Power: 14
hbears341 is just really nicehbears341 is just really nicehbears341 is just really nicehbears341 is just really nicehbears341 is just really nice
This is complete BS and you should be awarded your winnings.

Good Luck!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 7th September 2006, 04:24 PM
Simmo!'s Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Engerland
Posts: 7,086
WTGs: 2
WTGd at 71 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 1,052
Thanked 2,425 Times in 1,178 Posts
Reputation Points: 12848
Rep Power: 15
Simmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by bpb View Post
I personally think that if a casino denies payment based on information that they had prior to accepting the players wagers, then that casino should be immediately rogued.
Thats a very good point
__________________

++++ OGGS.com Online Casino Reviews ++++ ++++


Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 7th September 2006, 09:02 PM
tennis_balls's Avatar
donkey
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,563
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 753
Thanked 703 Times in 428 Posts
Reputation Points: 3847
Rep Power: 37
tennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to tennis_balls
a "rouge" coloured brandy

welcome to the rouges, brandy!
__________________
++++ http://badtennisballs.ytmnd.com/ ++++
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 7th September 2006, 09:53 PM
handkey's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 142
WTGs: 2
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 29
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts
Reputation Points: 192
Rep Power: 14
handkey is very cool!handkey is very cool!
Send a message via MSN to handkey
congratulations!!

And , How do you deal with this great 20K?
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 9th September 2006, 09:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Online
Posts: 20
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Reputation Points: 17
Rep Power: 10
backjlack is on a distinguished road
Brandy quotes made-up rules to deny payment of my winnings.

Yesterday (Sept. 8), I finally received a reply from Brandy's manager Lisa.

To justify Brandy's refusal to pay me she quotes rules that weren't (and still aren't) part of the terms and conditions.

Quote:
Dear xxxx,

I would like to congratulate you on winning that spin!

Meanwhile, I am sorry to inform you that our fraud department found out that some of the promo rules were misunderstood by several players which led to violation of promotional requirement which states that: “one player can get only one 2TD account, one 20TD account, and one 200TD account”.

All of the accounts which voided this requirement were frozen and deposits returned to the players.

I again apologize for any possible inconvenience caused and hope for your understanding and cooperation.

Warmest regards,
The line that she quotes is not and was not part of the very complete and very detailed terms and conditions that were emailed to elligible players.

Lisa also completely fails to address the fact that I was explicitly made welcome to open more than one account on the days when I played.

I'm just realizing that there is an important detail I forgot to mention previously : I played this promo in the course of FOUR separate days (Sept. 1, 2, 3 and 4), which implies :

1 - That I wasn't trying to 'slip under the radar' or anything of the sort.
2 - That they had plenty of time to react, unless, of course, they were quite happy with my playing again and again up until the moment I won.

Last edited by Simmo!; 14th November 2006 at 08:13 PM. Reason: removed quotes upon request
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 9th September 2006, 11:29 PM
nafanny29's Avatar
Punter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, England
Posts: 677
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 61
Thanked 72 Times in 53 Posts
Reputation Points: 529
Rep Power: 23
nafanny29 is a glorious beacon of lightnafanny29 is a glorious beacon of lightnafanny29 is a glorious beacon of lightnafanny29 is a glorious beacon of lightnafanny29 is a glorious beacon of lightnafanny29 is a glorious beacon of light
Brandy have no legitimate excuse not to pay you. They accepted your deposit and let you play several times.

If they insist on not paying you then they are no better than the worst online casinos out there and I hope the word gets out and it costs them 100 x the $20000. This industry is 10 years old and still we see this BS all the time.
__________________
aka thatsBAD
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bet Royal Cashout Problems Thremp Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues 31 1st November 2007 07:13 AM
Royal Vegas/Prima Poker accusation of collusion POlka78 Poker Complaints 11 23rd August 2006 07:12 PM
Experience of 100free Spins by Royal Vegas Casino tiger2006 Online Casinos 24 29th May 2006 12:55 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2008


  Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews | Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Winneronline | Online Casinos| Online Slots | Online Casino Reviews

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.

Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk