Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > Online Casino and Poker Complaints > Sportsbook Complaints

Notices

Sportsbook Complaints Here you can bitch and moan about sportsbooks.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10th November 2007, 02:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hungary
Posts: 14
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Reputation Points: 20
Rep Power: 0
kaszino is on a distinguished road
If the betting limit is same low for every customers, then it is OK, but if they cut one customer's limit to 1% it is discrimination.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10th November 2007, 02:22 PM
ugaboga's Avatar
Casino Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 212
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 63
Thanked 277 Times in 82 Posts
Reputation Points: 1459
Rep Power: 12
ugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by wangpoker View Post
Sportsbooks low betting limits to protect their business. It's normal! It's not a kind of discrimination at all.

If you are limited and don't like it, go to other sportsbooks.
A reputable sportsbook would not do this.

Kaszino, I'd recommend you try Centrebet. Or even Sportstab (tabcorp) for large stakes. Neither of these would limit you for winning, at least Centrebet did not do so when it was owned by Terry Lillis.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10th November 2007, 03:00 PM
I-Gaming Industry Representative
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wigan
Posts: 100
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 55
Thanked 72 Times in 36 Posts
Reputation Points: 370
Rep Power: 10
shaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaszino View Post
If the betting limit is same low for every customers, then it is OK, but if they cut one customer's limit to 1% it is discrimination.
If someone has $4000 on a selection the bookmaker has to think how much they're going to lose if the selection wins, they've then got to balance this with all the other selections in the event so they are right to limit this guy. if you have $4000 at 4/1 your not gonna get another $4000 on at 4/1 are you? they'll either cut the price to about 2/1 or limit your stake, thats whats most commonly done, no discrimination at all.
__________________
Totesport Casino
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10th November 2007, 03:03 PM
ugaboga's Avatar
Casino Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 212
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 63
Thanked 277 Times in 82 Posts
Reputation Points: 1459
Rep Power: 12
ugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud of
It is discrimination because they are singling out a knowledgeable punter. They are limiting him on all events or only those events which he seems have a strong win-loss ratio in.

Now the issue here is that they would allow another punter to place the $4,000 but not him. Anyone reputable sportsbook would have a fair playing field for all customers.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10th November 2007, 03:07 PM
I-Gaming Industry Representative
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wigan
Posts: 100
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 55
Thanked 72 Times in 36 Posts
Reputation Points: 370
Rep Power: 10
shaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by ugaboga View Post
Now the issue here is that they would allow another punter to place the $4,000 but not him. Anyone reputable sportsbook would have a fair playing field for all customers.
if you read his first post HE was the one who placed the $4000 bet so that's why they have limited him.
__________________
Totesport Casino
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10th November 2007, 03:30 PM
ugaboga's Avatar
Casino Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 212
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 63
Thanked 277 Times in 82 Posts
Reputation Points: 1459
Rep Power: 12
ugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud ofugaboga has much to be proud of
Yes but the limit does not apply to others who would like to place a $4,000 bet on the same outcome....
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10th November 2007, 03:39 PM
I-Gaming Industry Representative
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wigan
Posts: 100
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 55
Thanked 72 Times in 36 Posts
Reputation Points: 370
Rep Power: 10
shaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by ugaboga View Post
Yes but the limit does not apply to others who would like to place a $4,000 bet on the same outcome....
if 10 people put $4000 then tried to get more on, every single one of them will be limited if they try to get more money on, they wouldn't just limit the one person, they're not bothered who bets on a market, they're all about business and to be fair, if he didn't like hit he could have bet with someone else. just my opinion
__________________
Totesport Casino
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10th November 2007, 03:41 PM
Banned User - repetitive violations of posting rule 1.1
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 3,128
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 3,554
Thanked 1,816 Times in 1,217 Posts
Reputation Points: 15
Rep Power: 0
lojo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaunm View Post
if 10 people put $4000 then tried to get more on, every single one of them will be limited if they try to get more money on, they wouldn't just limit the one person, they're not bothered who bets on a market, they're all about business and to be fair, if he didn't like hit he could have bet with someone else. just my opinion
The correct mechanism is to adjust the odds, not limit bets.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lojo For This Useful Post:
cyprean (9th December 2007)
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10th November 2007, 04:04 PM
I-Gaming Industry Representative
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wigan
Posts: 100
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 55
Thanked 72 Times in 36 Posts
Reputation Points: 370
Rep Power: 10
shaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the roughshaunm is a jewel in the rough
i just posted this in the other thread...

if there are 99 £10 bettors and 1 £20,000 bettor, and he/she puts £20,000 on a horse at 10/1, and the bookmaker cuts the price to 6/1, is it fair that all the £10 punters have to take this price? if you limit the big staking bettor, then he has £20,000 at 10/1 and the £10 bettors can get their money on at 10/1 so everyone is happy.


i think if the bookmaker thinks the horse will win and they have liabilities on a certain horse then they should cut the odds, but if someone has lumped alot of money on it, i dont think the small time customers should have the reduced price.
__________________
Totesport Casino
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shaunm For This Useful Post:
lojo (10th November 2007)
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10th November 2007, 04:23 PM
GrandMaster's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,107
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 122
Thanked 600 Times in 348 Posts
Reputation Points: 3291
Rep Power: 45
GrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond reputeGrandMaster has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaszino View Post
I live in Hungary, I do not know the rules in the UK or in the country where Bet365 is registered.
In Hungary you cannot behave like that. No discrimination between customers. The price is the same for everybody. You cannot ban people without proper reason.
Maybe in the UK if you run a business you can tell to a customer, I do not like your face, so get lost. In Hungary no. And if think so this is fair, because if you got a permission from the goverment to run a business, then you should not make any discrimination, like the goverment does allow discrimination between people.
1. Running a business in the UK or in Hungary does not need a permission from the government, only certain specific kinds of activities.
2. I challenge you to find a Hungarian law that says all kinds of discrimination are illegal. Do you also claim that Hungarian insurance companies insure all cars at the same premium, irrespective of the type and value of your car, your age, gender, address and claim history? Do Hungarian banks lend money to all people at the same interest rate? Do Hungarian businesses pay everyone the same salary regardless job title, qualifications and competence?
3. Do you claim that Gipsies are not disciminated against in Hungary?
__________________
"The voice of reason"
http://mb.winneronline.com moderator
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GrandMaster For This Useful Post:
Casinomeister  (19th December 2007), fatshaft (22nd January 2008), lojo (10th November 2007)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BET365 POKER SWITCHES TO PLAYTECH jetset Casinomeister's Poker Room 2 11th October 2007 06:03 PM
Delaware Sports Betting REOdeathwagon Casino Industry Discussion 4 17th April 2007 10:22 PM
New Italian licenses jetset Sportsbook Information 0 9th January 2007 10:20 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2008


  Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews | Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Winneronline | Online Casinos| Online Slots | Online Casino Reviews

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.

Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk