|
|||
|
|||||||
| Register | All Albums | Member Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Mark Forums Read | |||
| Main Site | CM Casinos | CM Poker | I-Gaming Forum Reps | Rogue Pit | Webcast | Bitchin' Newsletter | News |
| Notices |
| Sportsbook Complaints Here you can bitch and moan about sportsbooks. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
World Sports Exchange hidden forced betting policy
A couple days ago I spotted a couple of attractive prices in the politics section of WSEX. I deposited about $2000, bought the contracts that I wanted, and the line remained the same. So the next day I decided to deposit about $4000 more, but it would only let me buy the contracts at the stated price with less than $200 worth of action. The line changed and I decided I did not want to purchase any more at the changed price. So I requested a transfer of most of my funds to Matchbook where I thought I could put the money to better use. However, I received an email stating that the funds I deposited had to be wagered at least once before I could transfer them out (there were no bonuses involved for my deposits, only reimbursed money transfer fees).
I have not complained to them because I want everyone to be able to see that nowhere in their terms and conditions does it state that funds have to be wagered at least once before they can be transferred out, and I do not want them to add such a clause based on my complaint to their terms and conditions so they can say "look, it says so right in the terms and conditons." If someone could post a message on this thread stating that they confirm that there is no clause limiting withdrawals only to funds that have been turned over once, it might make it easier for me to get my money out of that sportsbook. If someone reading this message owns a competing sportsbook, you might want to make a small deposit there and shortly thereafter ask for its withdrawal so that you can have proof that WSEX is a shady operator. |
|
|||
|
I was able to turn over my deposit by shorting Tiger Woods at what is exactly fair value according to Betfair. Let's just hope he doesn't win (only a 3% chance it will happen).
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Delaware Sports Betting | REOdeathwagon | Casino Industry Discussion | 4 | 17th April 2007 10:22 PM |
| The War Against Online Gambling | Rollo | Casino Industry Discussion | 17 | 25th January 2007 04:43 AM |
Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews
| Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Winneronline | Online Casinos| Online Slots |
Online Casino Reviews
Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.