|
|||
|
|||||||
| Register | All Albums | Member Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Mark Forums Read | |||
| Main Site | CM Casinos | CM Poker | I-Gaming Forum Reps | Rogue Pit | Webcast | Bitchin' Newsletter | News |
| Notices |
| Poker Complaints Complaints concerning Poker Rooms are to be posted here |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (3) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
I have been winning for 3 years at online poker now. Of course there are still some bad weeks with a negative, but I have never had a whole month in the negative. (I also only play low stakes. NL50$ as the highest). Also I have some friends doing the same, some in tournaments.
So why are some winning and others not? I have also had some really bad beats. I have lost twice with 4oK etc (using two hole cards) to straight flush. (Shame I did not play on a bad beat jackpot table). There also is a program: PokerEV. Basically it, calculate equity during the streets and can then tell if you generally say if you have been lucky or not. (Using hands seen at showdown) Try this and see if you actually are as unlucky as you believe, you will see how many $ you will have more or less than expected. It requires PokerTracker, and do get it if you really ever want to learn poker. Zoozie |
|
||||
|
I will repeat my suspicion that these "pros" are affiliates who take commision of the money given to the rake by other players (the affliate helped into bringing these players to the casino).
Basically that means that such affiliates are something like casino share holders. I just noticed that in your profile Pokeraddict, you are stating you are a "pro". And you say you are not an affliate, whereas you have the bonuswhores page! That type of page can only belong to an affiliate. Perhaps not earning a percetage of the rake other players are gining to the rake, but a standard fee for every player registed to each casino through your page. You denied this. But I repeat the indications. And I will repeat, what a strange coincedence I got bad reputation points from only 2-3 people out of 1,200, and you were one of them. But let's suppose that all my suspicions are wrong. Lets start from another basis: Suppose that I am a crap poker player, and that was the reason of my losses, and not that I was cheated. As I said, I wish I could believe that I am a crap player, cause then I could hope I was not cheated. Variance, it could not be. I played thousands of hands with pennies. So, supposing I was not cheated, but I am a crap player. I have a serious question for you: What is your edge as a player if there was zero rake? Higher than 5%? So your edge exceeds the 5% rake and you can make profits with a 5% rake? Yes, I know you play bonuses and rakebacks, but lets forget about them. I am asking your edge if there was zero rake, and no other promotions. Don't tell me that it depens on your opponents. I am talking about your average edge overall. (for those who dont understand, edge is the $ of average profit for every 100$ wagered) Someone claimed that there are no fishes anymore as they are used to be, so he breakes even having the 5% rake, against him, but he gets the bonus at the end and the bonus equals his profits. So that player claims his edge as a player if there was no rake, is exactly 5%. So, what about you pokeraddict? And what about all of you constant winners at poker? What is your edge supposing the rake was zero? |
| The Following User Says Thank You to ThodorisK For This Useful Post: | ||
GaryWatson (31st December 2007) | ||
|
|||||
|
I had one session where I lost $100 in 2 hands, 5 hands apart.
One was a nut flush vs straight flush. The other was a boat vs bigger boat. Rigged? Nah. Bad luck. I've won over $1200 in one hand as well. Was that rigged against the other player? Nah. He just sucked ![]() Hand: http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...si1#post138778
__________________
I'll be out of the office for the most part until 11/14...Vegas, baby! |
|
||||
|
Oh, I forgot to mention, today I came 4th at a freeroll of 500-600 people and won 26$. Of course you can say that people dont play seriously in cheap freerolls. Indeed. But you can imagine how much I trust pokerooms that they dont cheat, that I prefer to play cheap freerolls. I repeat that I won the first prize of 500$ in a freeroll last christmas, beating 1027 people. That wasnt so cheap freeroll. That crap player I am. And I dont play freerolls that often. Hey, do you know any such good freerolls? (not with 2000 and 5000 players)
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to ThodorisK For This Useful Post: | ||
GaryWatson (31st December 2007) | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Keyser For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||||
|
how long until you are sitting at a poker table in Vegas wondering how many of the other players are bots?
__________________
++++ http://badtennisballs.ytmnd.com/ ++++ |
| The Following User Says Thank You to tennis_balls For This Useful Post: | ||
winbig (9th August 2007) | ||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
There is a huge difference in being a winning player and taking a meaningless amount of money out of a freeroll. BTW were the cards rigged in your favor because it was a freeroll? What about the other players? They must have been all bots right? Your neg rep was given because you started an identical thread about some ridiculous childish rant. If you go to your user CP you will see that. Why haven't you stopped gambling yet? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/poker-complaints/18946-i-am-more-than-90-certain-all-poker-rooms-rigged.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| The 2+2 Forum Archives: new more damning absolute evidence | This thread | Refback | 19th August 2008 09:28 AM | |
| The 2+2 Forum Archives: new more damning absolute evidence | This thread | Refback | 13th August 2008 09:32 PM | |
| I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ?? - Page 33 - Two Plus Two Forums | This thread | Refback | 21st February 2008 12:48 AM | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| interesting colluding poker bots article | REOdeathwagon | Poker Complaints | 11 | 13th November 2007 05:26 AM |
| Unique Gambling Articles for better SEO | manman | For Sale/to Buy | 0 | 20th June 2007 03:14 PM |
| European survey | jetset | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 0 | 9th February 2007 01:12 PM |
| Online Poker Players Face Legal Issues | Lord_Have_Mercy | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 1 | 6th August 2006 10:38 AM |
| Poker BIG BUSINESS - Enjoy the article | jmildstone | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 2 | 17th March 2005 04:00 PM |