I am more than 90% certain that all poker rooms are rigged

[winbig]

Originally Posted by ThodorisK

Yes, I have tried it all: slowplaying, agressive, and mixture of slowplaying and aggressive, using each of the 3 different strategies for thousands of hands, exactly in order to test the results. The results were that the more I wagered, the quicker i was losing.

Think of this: Suppose the management did indeed cheat, either manually or with the appropriate software. What would be the indications of this cheating? I keep seeing these indications to the maximum degree for thousands of hands. If all the indications are happening to the maximum degree and still cheating cannot be proven, then it never will, unless we hear confessions from inside the management.

One more strange indication:Yesterday, when I was playing in 3 tables, there were all full (6 players in each). After I left, 3 more players left immediatelly from each one of these 3 tables! This was another terrifying ... coincedence.

What can I say! Arent they scared that if their cheating is ever revealed they are going to lose all customers? Perhaps they know that people will still be playing even if they hear it every day on the TV news that all pokerooms cheat, and want to gamble even when knowing they are cheated.

You're boring me. Until you provide DETAILED PLAY LOGS, I'm not listening to another word you have to say. You're like a broken record.

If I was playing at the table(s) you were at, and you left, I'd leave too. Why? The ATM machine has left the building

[ThodorisK]

Doing a search "do online casinos cheat", I came up to is funny one: http://www.gamcare.org.uk/forum/index.php?tid=2781
Its amusing how naive is this millionaire gambler, and even more amusing are the reassurements and 100% certainty form the other posters that he has not cheated.
How many of you would keep betting 1000pounds=2000$ on every single hand, trusting that much any online casino?
I have doubts even if Pirate really did won that million $, or if it was a promotional trick. Yes, I know, it could be that he found a small degree of unrandomness in the “randomness” of the outcomes of the "random number ganerator". Yes, but even if he did find such a bias, what I find hard to believe is that Hamptons did not have the ability to cheat him. Or did the casinos start cheating at blackjack after many such pirates discovered such a bias and were winning persistently? Even this case is possible! I observed that RealTimeGaming casinos have a minimum bet of 5$ at blackjack. Was it always 5$, or it used to be 1$?

[ThodorisK]

sorry, I meant
"that he was not cheated"
instead of
"that he has not cheated"

[winbig]

Please do us all a favor and quit gambling online.

I can see it now - you're going to end up at 90yo still trying to prove that online casinos are rigged - but are still playing at them the whole time.

You continue to post what in your mind you view as proof, but when you're asked to show evidence (logs), you ignore the post altogether. Why?

[GaryWatson]

so I have the nuts high & low at omaha8 on the turn...... A while back so I can remember the exact hand.... a guess

A6 Hearts & 2 q

flop 58 hearts & 9diamonds

enough to push after the flop but not with any conviction.

turn card 2 hearts.

4 still in the pot and the betting is wild.

I may as well go all in. I have the hi & low nuts & im expecting to get called.

We all end up all in.

1) me - A 6 hearts 2 q
2) player 2 - 88 34
3) Player 3 - 55 10 j
4) player 4 - 34 67


Note # no-one else was suited. Everyone is all-in.

River card - 2 spades

How did I fair?

[winbig]

Originally Posted by GaryWatson

How did I fair?

Just be glad you won the low

[tennis_balls]

Originally Posted by winbig

Just be glad you won the low

he didn't win the lo either

[winbig]

Originally Posted by tennis_balls

he didn't win the lo either

Oops, didn't notice that. I just saw:

I have the hi & low nuts & im expecting to get called.

[tennis_balls]

Originally Posted by GaryWatson

1) me - A 6 hearts 2 q
2) player 2 - 88 34
3) Player 3 - 55 10 j
4) player 4 - 34 67

player 4 = ThodorisK?

[GaryWatson]

The moral of the story is that I was unlucky. Ive hit as bad at holdem but ive also done the same to others so it tends to even out in the long run. Dam right I was pissed off. End of the night, about to collect a 2.5k pot, only to end my night on a losing session.

Th, save $500 into a 50c-$1 session. Play as tight as hell, try to collect big on one or two hands an hour. Do that for a month, then come back and tell me its rigged. The above hand shows a bad beat & how easy it is to get wiped out. These hands do happen all the times, there are a lot of hands in between that help ease the blow.

I gave you a situation where I felt the best option was to push all in. Your q-8 flush, although good is not guaranteed to be the best hand on the board. Mine was at the time. These things just happen.

If you want to flip a coin, its a 50% chance of heads or tails but I would bet against 5 heads/ 5 tails out of 10 spins. That is a pure luck game but the stats might never balance off .

Spin a roulette wheell, the last 10 numbers have been red, its no more likely to be black that red on the next spin.

Poker has an element of skill. Although the game has a lot of luck involved, the better player is more likely to win during a session. I'll be happy to play you for an hour at heads up for play money & we can go over the stats here if you want. Im not the strongest player but I wont make too many mistakes. We can just flash our hole cards after the hand & that will end this stats theory once and for all.