|
|||
|
|||||||
| Register | All Albums | Member Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Mark Forums Read | |||
| Main Site | CM Casinos | CM Poker | I-Gaming Forum Reps | Rogue Pit | Webcast | Bitchin' Newsletter | News |
| Notices |
| Poker Complaints Complaints concerning Poker Rooms are to be posted here |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (3) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Yesterday I tried the first deposit bonus at a well known pokeroom and casino. It is also accredited in casinomeister. I dont know how many hands I played, as when I tried to check out my hand history, it was almost unreadable. However judging from the promotion points I earned, and considering I played at 0.15-0.30$ no limit, I guess I played about 120 hands in which I placed bets in the pot: Again the same story of ripoff.
Now, it was a mistake of mine that as an evidence of cheating, I had ended up into observing the number of how many of my strong hands win, over the number of how many of them lose. As I saw yesterday, and remembered from all my play in the other casinos, I had quite a few very strong flop hands in which everybody else folded even at preflop, but I lost almost all of my money when I was holding a three of a kind and a flush, but the other ONE opponent got something better. Examples, I had Q8diamonds, I got the flush with the ace of diamonds on the table, but the other one had the king of diamonds (everyone else had folded at the preflop I think). Another case: I had three of a kind, but the other one had a straight on the turn. Another case: I had three of the kind but the other one had a flush at the river with only three of the same suit on the table (and he betted big even at the flop) Another case: I had ace king, I flopped a king, but the other having KJ got a J at the turn and made two pairs. Many more same cases happened, in less than 120 hands that I followed betting or initiated betting at the flop. Oh, I had two full houses and other strong hands and everyone folded, even at preflop. So they let your strong hands win quite a few times, so that their statistics seem ok, but you win nothing on them. This way, you cannot prove that you were cheated, as one can claim that you just win small when you win and lose big when you lose, and so you lost only because you are a crap player. But I bet my life that the best poker player of the world would had lost if played in my place. Threes of the kind, staights and flushes, two pairs, and even top pairs at the flop coming from the best 20% of preflop cards, are bound to produce profit, instead of big losses, even in a low sample of 100 draws, no matter how bad player one is. Because EVEN the 20% of the preflop hands have a very high “expected value” WHEN PLAYED BY AN AVERAGE PLAYER (see http://www.pokerroom.com/poker/poker...by-players.php). Imagine then how high the expected value is, of these preflop hands (WHEN PLAYED BY AN AVERAGE PLAYER) when they succeed in getting a top pair (or even better, e.g. three of a kind) at the flop. The expected value then is so high, that the variance of poker cannot be the reason for losing a very large bankroll playing with pennies. I have played thousands of hands in other casinos. It cannot happen only to me that I have strong hands when the others have stronger. Sometimes at least, it must also happen to others that they have strong hands when I have stronger. But it almost never happens to another, whereas it almost always happens to me. And the losses because of the rake and the post blinds were negligible compared to that of crushing of my very strong hands. Perhaps I will purchase Pokertracker and let the casinos know this before I play again. Perhaps if I warn them beforehand that I am ready to post or give out everywhere the results of my play, will make them think twice before they cheat me again. And if they do cheat me, I am prepared to lose some money to ruin their reputation by giving out the results. I am checking now to see if the analysis of pokertracker is in anyway cabaple of finding the type of cheating I met. Some members rushed quickly to give me bad reputation points giving various reasons, but they are affiliates trying to close my mouth. I dont think the rest of the 800 people reading my thread were annoyed by my writings. They also try to degrade my arguments, but my arguments are not directed to stupid people. And clever people will suspect the intention of these members. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to ThodorisK For This Useful Post: | ||
GaryWatson (31st December 2007) | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Two of these people are webmasters - one is an affiliate. Please don't confuse webmasters with affiliates. The first bad rep you received was for making two near identical threads instead of one, so it had nothing to do with the content. So to say that affiliates are trying to close your mouth is pretty much far from the truth. If you want your points back, you can always start making posts that people find helpful or constructive. A simple "thanks" is worth five points. Three of these would get you out of the hole.
__________________
Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy ~Ben Franklin Useful links: ~ Accredited Casinos ~ I-Gaming Representatives ~ Evil Section ~ My Wish List ~ The Meister on YouTube ~ Donate Now! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Stronger hands do have the potential to bust a player if they do not have sufficient funds to cover these losses. Theory, they are more difficult to fold even when the other players betting suggests they have caught a deceptive hand. Your theory contradicts another popular myth - that short stacks always get the lucky beats to keep the rake flowing. I never dropped youre reputation points although I do disagree with your point of view. In the long run the strength of betting will dictate how likely a strong hand will lose. Do you allow other players a cheap flop? Do you allow players the chance of a flush draw? Do you bet too weakly? Maybe just bet your hands out a little stronger. Who cares if you win the pot there and then? You will encounter less bad beats. With a little more experience you will learn how to get the most profit from a given hand. I suggest you use your stats experience and use that to push out drawing hands, Ie if they call your raise, they have made a mistake. Just keep playing that way and you will win more often with these stronger hands |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The best hand in poker doesnt always win ! WAYLANDER |
|
|||
|
120 hands where I initiated or followed bets at the flop. But this happened just yesterday, I have played thousands such hands with the same happening, at William Hill, Sportingbet, 888.com, and the 120 hands were form Interpoker.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to ThodorisK For This Useful Post: | ||
GaryWatson (31st December 2007) | ||
|
||||
|
I played for 9 hours in Deadwood yesterday as there are tons of bikers in town for Sturgis. I lost AA that made a set twice and KK twice. The hands that beat me were all garbage. Should I blame the dealer? Was he dealing from the bottom? Was he friends with the drunken biker that beat me? Was the house in on it to generate more rake?
STOP GAMBLING! BTW A 120 hand sample is useless. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Talk is cheap, let's see your "proof".
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwHWGYwYk40 Great clip from "The Sixth Sense" - Directors Cut |
|
|||
|
Yes, I have tried it all: slowplaying, agressive, and mixture of slowplaying and aggressive, using each of the 3 different strategies for thousands of hands, exactly in order to test the results. The results were that the more I wagered, the quicker i was losing.
Think of this: Suppose the management did indeed cheat, either manually or with the appropriate software. What would be the indications of this cheating? I keep seeing these indications to the maximum degree for thousands of hands. If all the indications are happening to the maximum degree and still cheating cannot be proven, then it never will, unless we hear confessions from inside the management. One more strange indication:Yesterday, when I was playing in 3 tables, there were all full (6 players in each). After I left, 3 more players left immediatelly from each one of these 3 tables! This was another terrifying ... coincedence. What can I say! Arent they scared that if their cheating is ever revealed they are going to lose all customers? Perhaps they know that people will still be playing even if they hear it every day on the TV news that all pokerooms cheat, and want to gamble even when knowing they are cheated. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to ThodorisK For This Useful Post: | ||
GaryWatson (31st December 2007) | ||
|
|||
|
5 cards make up a hand. throw all the stats out the window. i love on t v when they have the statistical advantage displayed preflop. useless!! i love the morons who think the hole cards determine the hand. they dont. thod, i am not knocking you personally but you definitly have some homework to do. play at a live tourney. you might play 5 pots an hour excluding blinds. it's not like t v when they just show the best hands. some like to call everything but those are the guys who get smoked when garbage flops. play your big hole cards correctly, dont look to bust everyone with big hands, dont chase, and fold everything else and your game will improve. the disipline is being able to fold a good hand now and then. many atournament lost cause someone didnt want to lay down pocket q's. pride in poker kills!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/poker-complaints/18946-i-am-more-than-90-certain-all-poker-rooms-rigged.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| The 2+2 Forum Archives: new more damning absolute evidence | This thread | Refback | 19th August 2008 08:28 AM | |
| The 2+2 Forum Archives: new more damning absolute evidence | This thread | Refback | 13th August 2008 08:32 PM | |
| I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ?? - Page 33 - Two Plus Two Forums | This thread | Refback | 20th February 2008 11:48 PM | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| interesting colluding poker bots article | REOdeathwagon | Poker Complaints | 11 | 13th November 2007 04:26 AM |
| Unique Gambling Articles for better SEO | manman | For Sale/to Buy | 0 | 20th June 2007 02:14 PM |
| European survey | jetset | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 0 | 9th February 2007 12:12 PM |
| Online Poker Players Face Legal Issues | Lord_Have_Mercy | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 1 | 6th August 2006 09:38 AM |
| Poker BIG BUSINESS - Enjoy the article | jmildstone | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 2 | 17th March 2005 03:00 PM |
Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews
| Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Winneronline | Online Casinos| Online Slots |
Online Casino Reviews
Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.