
Originally Posted by
Scooter7
If, after the dust clears, it's proven that a casino operator can get away with unscrupulous behaviour, then the anti-online gaming crowd will have some serious ammunition to fire at the whole industry...not just the unethical operators.
If, on the other hand, a strong, enforceable ruling that makes an example of poor behaviour is delivered, then the pro-online gaming supporters will have an important victory. It will prove that the industry is pursuing an aggressive self-regulating reputation and that further regulation will lead to a strong, ethical, and trustworthy industry.
I think this story, if properly spread to the mainstream media, can have a huge negative or positive impact on good and bad operators alike depending on how the issue is resolved.
Comments?
Scooter, I think you've nailed it. Given the debate currently going on in the US, this issue couldn't have come at a better (or worse) time, dependent on the outcome.
This issue is about social responsibility, and how much of that responsibility the operators and regulators are willing to assume, and should assume. I can't stress enough how important I think it is that a precedent be set.
Excellent post!!
It's amazing how many new contributors to the forum this issue has brought out, I hope everyone sticks around after this is over. We could sure use some more reasonable, level-headed people who actually give a shit around here.
Attn: New Members! Make sure to check out the "Casinomeister Accredited Casinos" and the "Spot The Rogue" section of the main site here before jumping into "Online Casinos" with no information or knowledge behind you!
Bookmarks