Nostalgia Cipher Strand

[cynowoo]

I understand and respect your response on cipers' word.

banning away of 2 weeks is enough , CIPHER is a great guy both in character and professional skills.

Hope u guys would understand each other.

Please don't get me wrong, read carefully what I have said -- I have nothing against the "strands", it was Cipher's attitude towards the forum members, me, and my forum that I had a probelm with. He's welcome to participate in a rational non-belligerent manner.

I told him I'm ready to talk when he mellows out.

[Black21Jack]

CIPHER is a great guy both in character and professional skills.

Hope u guys would understand each other.

I agree. I will not voice my opinion on his banning as it is Bryan's forum and it is his sole decision on who he allows here and who he does not. I look forward to cipher's return, and more posts of his cipher strands. I too hope that Cm and cipher work out their problems.

[jerseyguy11]

ditto

[largeeyes]

I don't want to turn this thread into strand central, but quite honestly, they have no value. You can't just randomly take little snippets and hold them up as some proof of a conspiracy theory. It's a bit like the Hood 3000 system. Nothing but hot air that can only lead to confuse and mislead people.

[bpb]

I don't want to turn this thread into strand central, but quite honestly, they have no value. You can't just randomly take little snippets and hold them up as some proof of a conspiracy theory. It's a bit like the Hood 3000 system. Nothing but hot air that can only lead to confuse and mislead people.

Seconded.

Providing information and allowing people to draw their own conclusions is one thing. Providing information, calling it the smoking gun that proves that casino XYZ is rigging their deal, and damning anyone who says otherwise, is quite another.

[bethug]

largeeyes, and bpb, please click my sig
i have a few word for you

[Black21Jack]

Seconded.

Providing information and allowing people to draw their own conclusions is one thing. Providing information, calling it the smoking gun that proves that casino XYZ is rigging their deal, and damning anyone who says otherwise, is quite another.

cipher never said that it proves any casino is rigging their software. He posts strands on certain casinos, states his opinion and leaves it for people to come to their own conclusions.

[sw2003]

I think it is sad that Cipher got banned for 2 weeks! He probably had a really bad day before he started firing off at Bryan. Anyway I thought it was nice to have someone providing analyses on the gameplay from various softwares on a regular basis. Otherwise we will just have to take whatever results that the casinos dare to throw at us like we are a bunch of gullible idiots.

[Casinomeister]

I think it is sad that Cipher got banned for 2 weeks! He probably had a really bad day before he started firing off at Bryan. Anyway I thought it was nice to have someone providing analyses on the gameplay from various softwares on a regular basis. Otherwise we will just have to take whatever results that the casinos dare to throw at us like we are a bunch of gullible idiots.

Perhaps we were both having a bad day. He's been notified that he's welcome back under a gentlemen's agreement that we're to keep things civil.

[caruso]

...Otherwise we will just have to take whatever results that the casinos dare to throw at us like we are a bunch of gullible idiots.

There are currently enough genuine projects out there for this to be entirely not the case. The OCA is still around, and Fairdice will hopefully get themselves together before long. That in addition to Cipher's programme, whatever its exact purpose may be.

My forecast is that the fat lady is currently clearing her throat for online casino cheating scum software.