Manhattan Slots (CWC): Should I be suspicious of their SicBo?

[milemaster]

I always like to play SicBo for a few rolls after a nice run on the slots. Generally I just wager on High(11 thru 17) or Low(4 thru 10) rather than individual numbers.

Of the 370 rolls of the dice in the last 30 days, 81% (289 times of 370 rolls) of them came up Low (4-10). Naturally most of my bets were on the "high" value so I was on the losing end of that percentage. The longest streak was 11 times in a row. This isn't over one session, but many over the course of the last 30 days.

What is your experience playing SicBo at the CWC casinos?

 

[Nifty29]

I always like to play SicBo for a few rolls after a nice run on the slots. Generally I just wager on High(11 thru 17) or Low(4 thru 10) rather than individual numbers.

Of the 370 rolls of the dice in the last 30 days, 81% (289 times of 370 rolls) of them came up Low (4-10). Naturally most of my bets were on the "high" value so I was on the losing end of that percentage. The longest streak was 11 times in a row. This isn't over one session, but many over the course of the last 30 days.

What is your experience playing SicBo at the CWC casinos?

I would say that 370 rolls is an incredibly small sample, and hence just about anything is possible even in a fair game.

I would also suggest that if the streak was in your favour, we wouldn't be reading. It's nothing personal, just human nature I.e. we forget about the amazing good runs because we think we "deserve" it, but we find the horrible runs difficult to accept and only then do some question the integrity of the software. In fact, we should see just as many threads challenging game fairness as a result of good runs, but of course we don't.