QT/ Eco same company

**lnspin** · 28th May 2011, 02:41 AM

Is there any way to prove that eco own qt.

Guess what im asking is if theres concrete proof anywhere that ecocard is the owner of usemywallet/quicktender.

**SlotKing** · 28th May 2011, 06:31 AM

There was... before the QT site was taken down. If you had looked at the T&C's of QT, you would have seen that Eco owned them. Ecocard ceased to be an option for US players when UIGEA passed, but they brought QT out not too far after.

**lnspin** · 28th May 2011, 06:54 AM

Slotking, do you remember where this was stated as i looked in the T&c and could not find the info. http://web.archive.org/web/200906270...icktender.com/

Im asking as I know they are the same company as ecocard, but i don't have proof, Now if ecocard stays in business i want m money from them. Someones paying, be it QT, Ecocard, DOJ, Im sick of getting screwed. Either im getting cash or ill get my personal satisfaction another way.

**chuchu59** · 28th May 2011, 06:55 AM

not sure if this means anything but ecocard is no longer a banking option at several rival casinos eg vegas regal whereas its still there at inet(rtg) and red flush(mg).

**SadFatMan** · 28th May 2011, 06:55 AM

Originally Posted by lnspin

Slotking, do you remember where this was stated as i looked in the T&c and could not find the info. http://web.archive.org/web/200906270...icktender.com/
Either im getting cash or ill get my personal satisfaction another way.

**pokeraddict** · 28th May 2011, 06:57 AM

Originally Posted by lnspin

Slotking, do you remember where this was stated as i looked in the T&c and could not find the info. http://web.archive.org/web/200906270...icktender.com/

Im asking as I know they are the same company as ecocard, but i don't have proof, Now if ecocard stays in business i want m money from them. Someones paying, be it QT, Ecocard, DOJ, Im sick of getting screwed. Either im getting cash or ill get my personal satisfaction another way.

Considering the DOJ was dealing directly with Ecocard, then the QT bank accounts were seized because of those discussions, makes the relationship obvious. The trouble is that they likely separated the money which is why they spun off the U.S. only processors. The UMW/QT terms stated that if they got seized or otherwise failed you were out of luck. I don't think you would have a legal case against Ecocard if the companies were spun off.

**ergopro** · 28th May 2011, 07:12 AM

Just for a comparison...these T&C are from QT and Ecocard...the text is almost identical.

Edit: Doesn't show properly...I'll link it to Photobucket for the entire image.
s7.photobucket.com/albums/y273/ergopro/?action=view&current=QT-ECO2.jpg

**Nifty29** · 28th May 2011, 07:13 AM

Originally Posted by lnspin

Slotking, do you remember where this was stated as i looked in the T&c and could not find the info. http://web.archive.org/web/200906270...icktender.com/

Im asking as I know they are the same company as ecocard, but i don't have proof, Now if ecocard stays in business i want m money from them. Someones paying, be it QT, Ecocard, DOJ, Im sick of getting screwed. Either im getting cash or ill get my personal satisfaction another way.

And how are you going to do that?

Send DOJ an invoice? Threaten them?

I know you're pissed, and I would be too, but saying things like that could get you into trouble if big brother is indeed watching.

**lnspin** · 28th May 2011, 07:38 AM

Originally Posted by Nifty29

And how are you going to do that?

Send DOJ an invoice? Threaten them?

I know you're pissed, and I would be too, but saying things like that could get you into trouble if big brother is indeed watching.

What have i said wrong. I did not make any threats. just venting. My Personal satisfaction will be taking an image of QT and pissing on it.

It the DOJ does have the money, i think thats the best chance for it to be returned, but i don't think they have much of it.

This is the thing, the accounts that were seized were just pass thru accounts, QT would send money from there main account, to these other accounts to process withdrawals, there was never much in them, just enough to cover there withdrawals that were requested. From what i know the main account was never hit, the doj did not seize it.

**Nifty29** · 28th May 2011, 08:26 AM

Originally Posted by lnspin

What have i said wrong. I did not make any threats. just venting. My Personal satisfaction will be taking an image of QT and pissing on it.

It the DOJ does have the money, i think thats the best chance for it to be returned, but i don't think they have much of it.

This is the thing, the accounts that were seized were just pass thru accounts, QT would send money from there main account, to these other accounts to process withdrawals, there was never much in them, just enough to cover there withdrawals that were requested. From what i know the main account was never hit, the doj did not seize it.

Make sure you post the pic