4 BJ in a row

[Clayman]

I had 4 BJ's in a row once, otherwise it was one of my worst sessions, I was completely wiped out.

Don't feel bad. I had a hole-in-one once and still shot a 94.

Never 4 BJ's in a row. Woe is me.

What seems good, often ain't.

[jpm]

Did you have trouble getting by the windmill too? That hole is a b*tch!

[Casinomeister]

Did you have trouble getting by the windmill too? That hole is a b*tch!

[GrandMaster]

Don't feel bad. I had a hole-in-one once and still shot a 94.

Never 4 BJ's in a row. Woe is me.

What seems good, often ain't.

The odds of a hole-in-one seem to be around 1 in 10000, so it is more like getting 3 BJ's in a row. The probability of a hole-in-one involves also depends on your skills, of course.

[Clayman]

Did you have trouble getting by the windmill too? That hole is a b*tch!

ROTFLMAO

And, GM, I think I'm a pretty darn skillful player whenever I get 3 BJ's in a row

[gfkostas]

Did you have trouble getting by the windmill too? That hole is a b*tch!

LOLLLL I like jpm humour

[chucho]

I recently played at 3 different Play Tech casinos, two within hours and one the next morning. I got 3 BJ's in a row at each of them once each. That is the nature of Play Tech, they cheat both ways. Sure it is fun to get 3 BJ's in a row, which it is how they have written the software, to keep it fun for the player. But it is nearly tough to win a double or a split on a Play Tech casino and nearly impossible to win a double or split on a $25+ bet. Beyond that, has anyone ever one more than 5 hands in a row at a Play Tech casino? The dealer will go on 10+ streaks all day but the player never. And those doubles that you get a 20 on almost always means the dealer will get 21 with 3 cards. I have played billions of hands at all the major softwares so and I do not have a problem with any of the others, maybe a bit with OddsOn. But it is official, Play Tech is rigged and they do not do a good job of hiding it.

[caruso]

I had five consecutive pontoons a few days back. The last one pushed and lost, but even so: almost 4,000,000 to 1. Only a little short of the probability of a pat royal.

[caruso]

Check that, one zero out. Equal to the probability of almost seven pat royals. LOL.