Which RTG casinos SUCK? Which RULE? Shout it out HERE!

[Nifty29]

Apology accepted

[silcnlayc]

Nifty29 Apology accepted

Thank you..it is appreciated wholeheartedly...now I am going to go take a chill pill...and try not to get so excited....

.

[Mavin1]

There will always be that certain amount of people that will continue to believe the IRS is legit, the FDA won't allow bad things in our food, Mercury in our childrens innoculations is safe because they say so, that the H1N1 shot is good for us, that Chemtrails are harmless, that flouride in our drinking water is good for our teeth, that artificial sweetners will help you to lose weight and television won't rot your brain. So it goes the same for casino's, there are those that will defend them to their last breath and those that won't. As long as people are winning "occasionally", then all is good and the cradle is rocking. When the cradle rocks no more then we start waking up. We give our little bits of funds for months on end with nothing more than than a slap on the butt time and time again and it gets pretty old.
That is why we complain. We want to continue playing at RTG's because they have great slots, but just like playing ball, if you keep getting hit in the head with the ball, then it's not fun anymore.
You will ask, then why do you keep playing? Well, because we still have the need to believe.

[TOC]

A shill post?
You don't even know the meaning of that word, obviously.
Man you are so out of line in this thread it's embarrassing to read.

I totally agree with everything Nifty said - I would thank him more, but the new limiting system prevents it. Great posts Nifty, and I'm glad at least you stay level headed and cordial when someone has the audacity to disagree with you!

KK

Sometimes shills may be used to downplay legitimate complaints posted by users on the Internet.

[johnshoe333]

Intertops Red

[/shill post]

this was all on a 50.00 bonus chip cashed out the 250.00 max and then redeposited 50.00 and rest is history as you can see IMO intertops red is great casino....11/18/2009 1:45:12 PM SportsBook Transfer Withdrawal Approved! ($1,100.01)
11/18/2009 1:45:12 PM SportsBook Transfer Withdrawal Requested ($1,100.01)
11/18/2009 1:44:39 PM SportsBook Transfer Deposit Approved! $1,100.01
11/18/2009 1:44:39 PM SportsBook Transfer Deposit Requested $1,100.01
11/18/2009 1:43:47 PM SportsBook Transfer Withdrawal Approved! ($400.01)
11/18/2009 1:43:47 PM SportsBook Transfer Withdrawal Requested ($400.01)
11/18/2009 1:32:17 PM SportsBook Transfer Withdrawal Approved! ($300.00)
11/18/2009 1:32:17 PM SportsBook Transfer Withdrawal Requested ($300.00)
11/18/2009 1:23:54 PM SportsBook Transfer Deposit Approved! $50.00
11/18/2009 1:23:54 PM SportsBook Transfer Deposit Requested $50.00
11/18/2009 1:21:10 PM SportsBook Transfer Withdrawal Approved! ($150.00)
11/18/2009 1:21:10 PM SportsBook Transfer Withdrawal Requested ($150.00)
11/18/2009 1:18:03 PM SportsBook Transfer Deposit Approved! $100.00
11/18/2009 1:18:03 PM SportsBook Transfer Deposit Requested $100.00
11/18/2009 1:17:15 PM SportsBook Transfer Deposit Approved! $50.00

[vegetagirl2008]

It's ok Nifty, RTG is probably the top U.S. player software, as history shows when you're on top people complain.. Gotta love the RTG threads.

The software maybe the best in the world. But....the operation of some casinos are left to be desired.

[bernynhel]

...if this tread is read Nify and you Jas don't know what you're talking about...I've done nothing wrong.....here ya come, trying to stir up crap...people get banned around here cause you guys lead them on...you should adjust yourself...this crap is nothing more than crap...Someone will see my point...

Uh, TOC, when's the last time you slept? (kidding! kinda)

Honestly, TOC, I just read everything in this thread, twice, and aside from your posts claiming that you were slandered, I can't see anything in a single post where Nifty29 or anyone else has so much as disrespected you or your site, let alone be guilty of having committed slander.

When I started this thread some dismissed the idea of a thread where CM members could shout out their opinions about which RTGs ruled vs ones that suck as flawed because, among other reasons, they just thought that shills would make a bunch of posts raving about RTG casinos. Not too likely that many shills are gonna get away with that, undetected, (and I'm not calling you a "shill", TOC!) huh!?

[TOC]

Just FYI for everybody reading this thread:

TOC OPERATES AN RTG CASINO

Im not saying anything else, just making sure everyone is aware.


@bern - yep bankroll management is what turned things around for me many years ago.

With all due respect, I'd suggest you read the thread for a third time and then study the many definitions of the word slander before addressing my replies. Among other members too.
In law, defamation—also called calumny, libel, slander (for spoken words), and vilification (for written or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image.
I may need to break this down so you'll understand.
1. defamation—also called calumny, libel, slander (for spoken words)
2. is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image.
3. May I point out the words Factual, Individual, business and Negative Image.

The above quote from Nifty is what fired me up a few days ago because it was intended to stir up problems, my opinion and it was defiantly slander per the above definition. I don't run an RTG Online Casino as implied above and it gave me, my website a negative image. As I tried to explain I operate a White Label casino which is like any affiliate site operator on CM's forum. I have two, not one casino that I support on the site along with a sports book, race book etc..
I don't advertise around here and I'm not looking for players from CM's site. I pay for advertising. But darned if I'm not going to stand up for myself in a public forum whether the groupies around here like it or not. Again, not trying to cause a problem just replying to what you said to me bernynhel.
The above is undisputed facts, sorry.

[jetset]

@TOC

If there's one pejorative that gets me going it's when folks refer to those with a differing opinion as "groupies".

The implication that a number of members are deliberately and maliciously colluding to denigrate another member is not only usually inaccurate, but also generally insulting imo, implying that there is an inability to form one's own opinion.

My individual opinion is that Nifty was right to draw attention to your position as an RTG supporter/white label operator, given your previous contributions here, and that he certainly did not intend to defame of even offend you.

Using the riposte that you are being libelled is therefore pretty much irrelevant to this discussion - again in my individual opinion.

TOC, if I may offer a suggestion; it's not the best idea to imply that other members on a message board are defaming/slandering/libelling/whatever you and could thus be open to litigation. The implied threat of legal action is in very bad taste and lacks the means of practical application for a whole range of considerations if you really think about it.

But the main thing is that it really isn't the convention to hint however remotely at such threats on a forum, presumably in the hope of silencing critics. That's why you so rarely see it being done.

BTW why the coyness on the identity of your white label? I can see you understandably take some pride in it, and your posts here have almost certainly heightened curiousity regarding it.

[TOC]

@TOC

If there's one pejorative that gets me going it's when folks refer to those with a differing opinion as "groupies".

The implication that a number of members are deliberately and maliciously colluding to denigrate another member is not only usually inaccurate, but also generally insulting imo, implying that there is an inability to form one's own opinion.

My individual opinion is that Nifty was right to draw attention to your position as an RTG supporter/white label operator, given your previous contributions here, and that he certainly did not intend to defame of even offend you.

Using the riposte that you are being libelled is therefore pretty much irrelevant to this discussion - again in my individual opinion.

TOC, if I may offer a suggestion; it's not the best idea to imply that other members on a message board are defaming/slandering/libelling/whatever you and could thus be open to litigation. The implied threat of legal action is in very bad taste and lacks the means of practical application for a whole range of considerations if you really think about it.

But the main thing is that it really isn't the convention to hint however remotely at such threats on a forum, presumably in the hope of silencing critics. That's why you so rarely see it being done.

BTW why the coyness on the identity of your white label? I can see you understandably take some pride in it, and your posts here have almost certainly heightened curiousity regarding it.

Really why must I go on? Jetset with over 11,031 posts you should see my point unless you're looking for 11,032? If I may address your questions, yes I address the older CM crowd as groupies, old timers, and whatever, why do you take this as an insult? They cause problems and keep dead threads going like yourself. I directed my post to Nifty & bernynhel only so where you get I'm ragging all members is incorrect. I only suggested that the new members take a look at what I'm saying. Your opinion is appreciated but facts are facts so why do you defend someone that's addressed and slandered me personally? I've never addressed litigation only facts. Right I'm gonna waste my time with litigation over my site or any member on CM! Bahaaa!! I've never threaten anyone on this site, only stated facts, you're wrong and out of line. If you for some reason you need the site address PM me like any normal member would do.