casino.net - good bonus for me as beginner?

[love2winalot]

Hiya: VWM has a great point. What it comes down to is you. That's right, YOU. You make a deposit, get a match bonus, meet play thru requirements, and have a Profit. WooooHoooo. Umm, now what?

Really, Now What?

Do you withdraw, and quit.
Do you play with the winnings?
Do you withdraw, and deposit someplace else, and try to do it again?

imhop: If you are going after a bonus, for the sole purpose of having as much of it left as possible, after playthru, then you should already know the answers to the questions above, before depositing.

PS: Players who actually end up with a positive cash flow from bonus offers, all have 3 things in common.
1. They know it takes money, to make money, and always get the max bonus allowed, via the largest deposit to bonus ratio allowed.
2. They will, "Exceed" playthru requirements.
3. And they are patient. They will play some other games after playthru is met, and they will withdraw LATER, and not 1 bet after playthru was met.
good luck to you.

[P@u1]

how much of this playthru requirements exeeding would you suggest?

And is not using a "F U Clause" against "bonus abusers" a requirement for accredited casinos, or do these casinos use this clause as well sometimes?

[Cyborg]

Originally Posted by P@u1

how much of this playthru requirements exeeding would you suggest?

Hi all,

I usually exceed about 10% playthru requirements. Do not know others opinion but it works for me

Is here anybody who plays in Casino.Net ? I read this thread but did not see any advice regarding that specific casino. I understand that BJ and VP is allowed in order to fullfill playthru requirements. Have you been paid when you played there ?
Thanx for response.

[vinylweatherman]

Originally Posted by P@u1

how much of this playthru requirements exeeding would you suggest?

And is not using a "F U Clause" against "bonus abusers" a requirement for accredited casinos, or do these casinos use this clause as well sometimes?

They CAN, but this risks their Accredited status, provided the player presents a valid PAB, or evidence to support an investigation by Max or CM into the casino's behaviour.

The criteria are forever evolving, and a recent addition is that a term must not be unfair. The wording of the "F U Clause" is usually unfair, because it does not contain enough information to allow the player to abide by what they shouldn't do.

Accredited casinos have to define what is not allowed, and what is. They cannot say nothing in the terms, and later deny winnings because of "irregular play", and remain accredited. This has lead to players here suggesting how "irregular play" might be defined to form part of the terms and conditions, and accredited casinos now feature definitions for "irregular play" on ALLOWED games. The two main terms are:-

1) No BIG bets, bets of more than x% of starting balance.
2) No "hedge" bets, such as both Red & Black on Roulette.

Accredited casinos can STILL ban players from FUTURE bonuses if they think the play has been "irregular", even though not outside the terms at the time. Some casinos bonus ban players merely for winning, rather than doing anything "wrong", such as "irregular play".

If any player is looking to play for profit based on welcome bonuses, it is important to know your CASINO GROUPS, otherwise you could end up getting into problems because you are hitting a string of casinos in the same group.
The days when you could fool them by hitting them all quickly over a weekend are over - they are wise to that one now