
Originally Posted by
Jufo
I think it was foreseeable that tickets would be handed out at reduced prize towards that start of the tournament. As for someone who paid 150 for a ticket, well you can buy expensive jacket from a shop for a full prize or wait until it is on 50% sale, so I don't see how this would be different from that.
Also it not difficult to estimate that the true value of Grand Slam ticket is around 20 - 50 (depending on average number of re-buys per player, which I estimate is somewhere between 5-10) so paying anything more than that is a bad decision EV wise, but then again someone might still be willing to pay 150 for just a very small chance to get the jackpot.
The one difference with another seat would be that you can have more than one winning position whereas with re-buys only the highest score counts and you won't get payout for a second highest score even if it was high enough to get a prize.
I had thought of this, but MGS would KNOW that it was a single player with more than one position. There was NOTHING about this in the terms, because this eventuality was NOT initially catered for.
I have no doubt that the sale of tickets was intended right from the start, otherwise there would have been ENOUGH FEEDERS/EVENTS RUN to distribute ALL the tickets by "winning one".
It looks as though maybe there was an intent to run FEWER feeders at first so that MORE MONEY would be made from players chasing down the tickets. If there were MORE feeders, there may have been far fewer players chasing down the tickets with rebuys and continues. This particularly applies to those events with unlimited continues, where players were essentially bidding for the tickets by paying for the continues. These players no doubt are particularly aggrieved to see tickets now on sale for 150 and even 75.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks