The problem here is the arrogant stupidity of businesses. CUSTOMERS are not running a business (mostly) and are unlikely to have fax machines knocking about on the off-chance. Faxes are out of date nowdays, with a big problem being that they can easily be unclear at the recipients end.
Digital documentation is now what is normally used, and the fact that the form itself is available in PDF format shows the casino recognises this.
For players that cannot drive or travel, the casino industry needs to ensure they can be catered to. In fact, there could be an offence under the disability discrimination act being committed since it is not possible for someone who is deemed as medically unfit to drive to possess a driving licence, even for ID purposes, and no alternative is currently offered here that includes a photo, except for a few local council schemes aimed at the 18-25 age range for proving ID in shops, pubs, and clubs. Someone, though, needs to make the first case of discrimination due to disability in this respect. A complaint to the UK Gambling commission on this general principle might help, even though this is not a casino they regulate.
Ironically, although you cannot get a real licence due to disability, a fake one is easy to come by through the networks that support the crime of "people trafficing". A recent TV program showed just how easy this was, and indeed another showed how easy it was to obtain a GENUINE Driving licence with stolen details, and the case they chose for demonstration was Mr Blunkett, who was BLIND, yet DVLA went ahead and issued the licence without anyone spotting the "bleedin' obvious".
Technology HAS the answer though, and it is the fingerprint scanner, now available as a USB device for the PC, and will prove to be a far better way to ID someone at the other end of an online transaction. The device is being incorporated into some PCs already, and it only needs the businessess involved in online transactions to start using this technology. Anyone with fingers can participate, unlike with the current system where you need to be fairly healthy to obtain the necessary proxy ID documents needed.
I am ALMOST in the same boat (which is why I am so damn FORCEFUL when this issue crops up). I was put on a "medical" drivers licence, which has to be reissued every three years. Had DVLA decided not to issue this, I would have found myself in the same position in not being able to prove my ID, and facing having to forfeit my winnings, or having such a struggle to get them that the industry would be forever rogue in my books.
It was only in 2006 that I got a passport, after winning a trip to Germany. This is the ONLY photo based ID available to all, but it is VERY expensive now, and requires attendance at an interview (no wonder the OP finds this not feasable). It is, however, actually ILLEGAL to send a copy of this to ANYONE, unless it is in Black and White - so when a casino requests a COLOUR copy of a player's passport here in the UK, they are asking them to commit an offence. This is all detailed in Home Office guidance, and is under the same guidance that tells us that it is also illegal for a hotel to take custody of a passport (which some try on to hold "ransom" in the event of a dispute). The reason behind this is technology, a colour image can be used to generate a creditable fake pasport than will pass most human scrutiny.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



i did return the extra payment btw but now i wish i had taken off $50 for time wasted in making me fill in the ######ing form
WTF does it matter whether the document has one or not, surely all that matters is the credibility of the organisation that issued it, and they always insist on this being at the level of a government body. Casinos online NEVER see your face as you enter, they see your IP address. It this insistence on a photo that causes much of the trouble, and this is because it is far more EXPENSIVE for the government to issue a photo document than a non-photo one, so naturally, most government documents are of the non-photo type. Only 2 in the UK are photo documents, and WE pay, not the government, and these are both voluntary, and even legally unavailable for some residents of the UK.
Bookmarks