
Originally Posted by
anniemac
As most of you know, I am trying to get $75 withdrawal out of Silver Oak. Do I really think I will get paid? Nope. Do they owe me the money? Yep.
But as I was digging around I came across this in their Terms and Conditions. Item 8 has been discussed here at great length, casinos saying no such database exists and players say yes it does. So here you are in black and white.
Now I am particularly fond of Item 18. This is probably what they will use to not pay me. Not the fraud part, the other. Sounds like a threat to me.
However, if I find out that something like this has happened, the SH*T will hit the fan.

8 is pretty damning. There is no "we reserve the right" that can be used to argue that they do not actually do this, or that they reserve the right, but only if said database exists. They use the present tense "We contribute to and make use of a shared industry database of promotion abusers". The only thing missing is the identity of this database, and whether it is just shared between casinos in the group, or is a true "central" database where information is passed to third parties.
18 is illegal in many countries for most instances, as only cases of PROVEN FRAUD can be lodged with reference agencies without open disclosure (which allows players to inspect, and correct, data held about them). If any false data is passed to a central database, the casino group could make themselves liable for damages, although in the case of Virtual this would have to be brought before a Costa Rican judge
(So they can pretty much get away with this).
The failure of the industry as a collective body to effectively deal with the rogue elements through existing self regulation is slowly damaging trust in even the reputable brands, where sometimes genuine mistakes, badly handled, make them look like they have joined the ranks of the rogue casinos.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks