thank so much INET, 3 months playing there, my first RJ

[oyw7862]

Extensively playing there for 3 months, my first RJ. Never get jackpot online before. So happy.
INET is the best.

 

[winnie77]

Congrats!! WTG!

I agree with you: iNetBet is the best. Nice and friendly support. No problem with them and fast cash-out too.

 

[AudiManinBoro]

Well done, tho slightly depressing if you have to bet 10.00 per spin in order to win one. Us mere mortals who plays on a much lower bet level probably dont stand much of a chance lol

 

[iNetBet Promos]

Congratulations on your win oyw7862.

Just to confirm you can win a Random Jackpot on any bet amount. Not as Audimaninboro says at $10 per spin.

The large Jackpot of nearly $17,000 won yesterday on Penguin Power was for $5 a spin.

In the past we have had numerous winners of Random Jackpots on the smallest denomination of 20c.

Congratulations once again oyw7862, enjoy your win

best Regards
iNetBet promos

 

[AudiManinBoro]

oh i agree its possible to win rj from smaller bets such as 20 and 40 (seen the screenshots) but ive been playing rtgs for years, always hoping but never seeing (crys) lol I do however happen to agree that inetbet are one of only a few i would ever play at. Ive never been much of a big winner with the rtgs unfortunatly or i would probably play a lot more with them. My luck seems to run a lot better with the mgs which is a pity cos i am actualyl becoming a little bored with them, but you play where you win dont you ultimately.

 

[silcnlayc]

Extensively playing there for 3 months,

The large Jackpot of nearly $17,000 won yesterday on Penguin Power was for $5 a spin.

So $5-$10 bucks must be the majic number it seems to hit one in such a short time period of playing at a given RTG.

Just to confirm you can win a Random Jackpot on any bet amount.

Thats nice to know...so the average players odds are very slim to none (the .40 cent to $2 player) even though they have been hit by lower denominations, and I think I read on the few of the lower wins that they just reduced their bet from a much higher bet when they caught it...

Us mere mortals who plays on a much lower bet level probably dont stand much of a chanc

I have come to believe the same thing. It has been proven as you see a 3 month player playing large bets hits one dead on..when others have been playing for years never caught one..there are a few multiple winners also that are high rollers...so all in all...it isn't a real even playing field...IMO

WTG on the win though!

This is not a dig at any one casino, just a realty check for the players that are the meat of their bottom line, I feel that we need not to expect to win much at all anymore..just donate so others can collect unless you become a high roller..All this is MY OPINION..for whatever it's worth..

The other thing I am notcing is that the older RTG operators are allowing the rj's to climb higher than average and I feel the reason for this is to entice players to try for them...and to try and keep their player base from roaming to the newer RTG's that have come aboard..anyone else noticing this??

.


.

 

[Jasminebed]

Well, my understanding is that a $20 is 100x as likely to hit as a $.20...seems fair enough to me.

But that such a number are climbing to new heights would indicate that the "trigger" for the random has been changed to hit less frequently, for all players.

 

[slotheadlizard]

Random

Congratulations on your win oyw7862.

Just to confirm you can win a Random Jackpot on any bet amount. Not as Audimaninboro says at $10 per spin.

The large Jackpot of nearly $17,000 won yesterday on Penguin Power was for $5 a spin.

In the past we have had numerous winners of Random Jackpots on the smallest denomination of 20c.

Congratulations once again oyw7862, enjoy your win

best Regards

iNetBet promos

Tru dat, I ht one on a 40cent bet and a buck at inet, I think for just 2,000, and 1,200 tho.

 

[silcnlayc]

Well, my understanding is that a $20 is 100x as likely to hit as a $.20...seems fair enough to me.

Just a scenerio...so if a person deposits $100 only once a day and bets $20 a spin and either busts or hits a RJ...vs a player depositing $200-$500 a day betting $2 and never hits but spends a lot more time and money tracking it than the $20 a spin bettor...how is this fair? Just wondering...

But that such a number are climbing to new heights would indicate that the "trigger" for the random has been changed to hit less frequently, for all players.

I agree that the "trigger' as you say has been adjusted to reflect higher jackpots...and to keep players interested..which is going to backfire IMO...


.

.

 

[HUNTS!!!!!]

i got 2 RJ's in the same day at inet recently
one on a .40 bet and the other on $1 bet if i remember rightly
i did post SS's
i chased that penguin power RJ a while ago when it was getting near to 10K
2 days straight on various bets to no avail obviously lloll

 

[me_and_ed]

It's my understanding that it actually hits at a selected randon dollar amount, so if your betting .20c a spin the climbing increments are very small, where the higher the bet the the greater the increment spread and thus the greater the chance to hit.

 

[iNetBet Promos]

Just to clarify a few things.

The Jackpots are Random - whether you play at 20c or $20 it makes no difference to the odds of winning. These remain the same no matter the bet size.

As Jasminebed and me_and_ed say the "chances" of hitting at $20 are increased compared to a spin of 20c. You have the same chance of hitting with one spin at $20 as you do 100 spins at 20c. That is the same amount of money wagered in order to try to win.

The Jackpots are random so it makes no difference how much an individual you play or for how long etc they can hit at any time. The system has no idea how much you have played previously. Each individual spin is unrelated to the last.

Of course your chances are increased if you play more. However we have had brand new players hit them in their first session with us. We have also seen the same Jackpot hit within a few spins of it last paying out. There is no given sequence.

I repeat again - we have not changed any settings on our Real Series Slots.

It is perfectly possible for the Jackpots to be hit at both large and small amounts. They are Random so there is no telling when one will hit and no given magic figure that they should or will hit at. So Jackpots can and will grow larger on some machines than others.

If you look at last months newsletter you will see that the Jackpots listed hit at all sorts of amounts. Old / Expired Link

Regards
iNetBet Promos

 

[reda]

i had been plying penguin power since it had reached 14.000. only betting 20 and 40cents. oh and if you look at inets news letter you will see that the player named hipixie who won penguin power wins a lot of jps. hipixie has won back to back and must be the luckies person ive seen hit like that. seems when you hit jps that often you can afford to bet 5 and 10 dollar bets.
mostly when a rj is that high and you got the extra funds its worth giving it a try. i wouldnt be that lucky. knowing me id spend all my winnings and be broke and not hit the RJ. but anyway congraulations to the winners. now i can quit chasing those RJS. lol

 

[Pepmintpatty]

wtg

Awesome for you! Still battling them myself. They're saying, it happens when you least expect it - Well I've been least expecting it for a while now! LOL Happy shopping 75% off sales EVERYWHERE!

 

[EasyRhino]

You know, RTG needs to add some art to make RJ's look more screenshot friendly when you win them.

Congratulations.

 

[silcnlayc]

oh and if you look at inets news letter you will see that the player named hipixie who won penguin power wins a lot of jps. hipixie has won back to back and must be the luckies person ive seen hit like that

Nicely stated...

The Jackpots are Random

Yup...I believe....

 

[dcpam39]

I have won 6 random jackpots over the last two years, 3 at BoDog, 1 at Club world, 1 at Jackpot Capital and 1 at Inetbet for over 10k, and they were won primarily on $1 bets-a couple were on $2 bets. I do believe you can win on any size denomination. What i have a problem with is that while i am trying for the random, it appears as if it is very difficult to hit any bonus features. I have found this especially true at Inetbet. Of course, it could be all in my head--I don't keep track of bonus rounds--but it sure feels different. Congrats to the orginal poster on your win.

 

[XOXOXOXOXOX]

while i am trying for the random, it appears as if it is very difficult to hit any bonus features.

hey dcpam39, could you please explain what does "trying for the random" mean? Don't you just click and click and click ??

 

[dcpam39]

That's exactly what i mean, click, click, click, and lately clicking with minimal bonus rounds.

 

[Jasminebed]

Okay, if I were "trying for the random" I would play the game with the highest jackpot...my $1 spin is as likely to win the highest one as the lowest one. All the RTG games have similar paybacks, so the main game would probably pay about the same, and my one in a zillion chance to win 1,200 is about equal to my one in a zillion chance to win $21,000.

 

[Edward D. Wood]

TIGER TREASURE.......not a pleasure

Yesterday I made a 30$ deposit...clicked on autoplay...a 1000 spins.
And ended with 107$. I really thought that 1000 spins should make it...but
nothing. So I tried it this morning again with 1$ spins. After about 200 I went
down
Sure, the chances are low to get one...but SO low. I played really really a lot at those slots...made gazillions of spins, from 20 cents to max 10$, but nothing ever happened. YES I AM SAD ....it would have been nice a a little boost on my account to get those 12.000$

 

[AudiManinBoro]

Id like to believe every one has an equal chance of hitting those rj`s but i simply dont (based on bet levels)and until i see it with my own eyes i never will, which is why the majority of my deposits will remain with mg casinos. They may not have Rjs but i win with them and often quite nicely too. Of course winning just one rj would be enough to convince most people it happens and by winning an rj i imagine most people lucky enough to do so would probably become a convert to rtg over night. I just dont see it happening tho for the vast majority who never seem to get anywhere with rtg, even with countless deposits lol

 

[EasyRhino]

Okay, if I were "trying for the random" I would play the game with the highest jackpot...my $1 spin is as likely to win the highest one as the lowest one. All the RTG games have similar paybacks, so the main game would probably pay about the same, and my one in a zillion chance to win 1,200 is about equal to my one in a zillion chance to win $21,000.

Good thinkin.

 

[XOXOXOXOXOX]

interesting, because i never ever "trying for random".
I thinks the chances are very slim and one just needs to be very lucky. Plus in my opinion RJs are usually not worth of 1000s of spins.

I do try to get bonus round though and if it didn't come after a while i stop, but from what you are saying here may be it's a sign that RJ is about to hit.

 

[pmhcfc]

Just to clarify a few things.

The Jackpots are Random - whether you play at 20c or $20 it makes no difference to the odds of winning. These remain the same no matter the bet size.

As Jasminebed and me_and_ed say the "chances" of hitting at $20 are increased compared to a spin of 20c. You have the same chance of hitting with one spin at $20 as you do 100 spins at 20c. That is the same amount of money wagered in order to try to win.

Regards
iNetBet Promos

Ok, so are you suggesting the system pre determines when it's going to pay you a RJ ? That's to say, the system 'says' - OK, when this customer has staked $20,000 total, he/she will get RJ. And if that's the case...1000 spins @ 20 or 100,000 spins @ 20 cents. Therefor, it's not the total amount of spins, but the total staked...and each customer has a different amount they need to stake before hitting an RJ, which in return is reset after a RJ win.

That philosophy certainly works (albeit in a different sense) at MG's Mega Moolah...Play for 6.25 a spin and you'll get a few chances at spinning the JP bonus...play for 25 pence a spin and it'll be forever before you even get the chance to win the $5 million (or whatever it stands at right now).

 

[DogBoy001]

Ok, so are you suggesting the system pre determines when it's going to pay you a RJ ? That's to say, the system 'says' - OK, when this customer has staked $20,000 total, he/she will get RJ. And if that's the case...1000 spins @ 20 or 100,000 spins @ 20 cents. Therefor, it's not the total amount of spins, but the total staked...and each customer has a different amount they need to stake before hitting an RJ, which in return is reset after a RJ win.

Heya,

That's not what's being stated.

The random jackpot evaluation is a test at the end of any given paid spin by an individual payer to see whether or not that player has won the jackpot.

The chance to win the jackpot is (n)
(n) is based on a bet of, say, $1, for ease of calculation

If a player bets $1, they have (n) chance to trigger and be awarded the random jackpot
If a player bets $5, they have (n*5) chance to win
If a player bets 20c, they have (n/5) chance to win

Each evaluation is independent and does not change based on anything other than the size of that individual bet.

Woooof

 

[pmhcfc]

Heya,

That's not what's being stated.

The random jackpot evaluation is a test at the end of any given paid spin by an individual payer to see whether or not that player has won the jackpot.

The chance to win the jackpot is (n)
(n) is based on a bet of, say, $1, for ease of calculation

If a player bets $1, they have (n) chance to trigger and be awarded the random jackpot
If a player bets $5, they have (n*5) chance to win
If a player bets 20c, they have (n/5) chance to win

Each evaluation is independent and does not change based on anything other than the size of that individual bet.

Woooof

Well, I understand the math and it's another way of putting things I suppose...But just to clarify my post- I wasn't suggesting that's how it works, merely asking a question.

In respect of what you've said, and assuming it works exactly as you say...then RJ's actually 'work' on individual spins? They'd surely hit more often than they do if that were the case...mathematically speaking...unless of course (and even if the maximum stake was $20) the n threshold is $500...translating into a 20c bet being n (minus) 2500 and so on

 

[DogBoy001]

Well, I understand the math and it's another way of putting things I suppose...But just to clarify my post- I wasn't suggesting that's how it works, merely asking a question.

In respect of what you've said, and assuming it works exactly as you say...then RJ's actually 'work' on individual spins? They'd surely hit more often than they do if that were the case...mathematically speaking...unless of course (and even if the maximum stake was $20) the n threshold is $500...translating into a 20c bet being n (minus) 2500 and so on

Heya,

The (n) might actually be, for example, 1 in 250,000 (for a bet size of $1)

If it was a $20 bet (n) would then be a 1 in 12500 chance, and conversely if it was a 20c bet (n) would become 1 in 1.25M

If an average trigger value is, say $3500, then this would contribute 1.4% of the game RTP (probability of trigger * value of prize), or (0.000004*3500)
This RTP contribution would be constant irrespective of bet size, since the relative probability versus the relative prize would be proportional.

e.g.: On a $20 bet the odds would become 0.00008 (1 in 12500) multiplied by the relative prize (3500/20) = 175, thus 0.00008*175 = 1.4%
On a 20c bet in this scenario it would be 0.0000008*17500 = 1.4%

These are examples only, but the latest game release does say that random jackpot RTP contribution is no more than 1.5% of the total (including both seed and increment)

Woooof

Edit: It's important to remember though that an "average trigger value" is a result of the test of the chance to trigger, rather than being a range-based jackpot or determinant.
So at the end of any paid spin it's purely a test of 1 in (n) to see whether a player wins the jackpot.

 

[pmhcfc]

Heya,

The (n) might actually be, for example, 1 in 250,000 (for a bet size of $1)

If it was a $20 bet (n) would then be a 1 in 12500 chance, and conversely if it was a 20c bet (n) would become 1 in 1.25M

If an average trigger value is, say $3500, then this would contribute 1.4% of the game RTP (probability of trigger * value of prize), or (0.000004*3500)
This RTP contribution would be constant irrespective of bet size, since the relative probability versus the relative prize would be proportional.

e.g.: On a $20 bet the odds would become 0.00008 (1 in 12500) multiplied by the relative prize (3500/20) = 175, thus 0.00008*175 = 1.4%
On a 20c bet in this scenario it would be 0.0000008*17500 = 1.4%

These are examples only, but the latest game release does say that random jackpot RTP contribution is no more than 1.5% of the total (including both seed and increment)

Woooof

Edit: It's important to remember though that an "average trigger value" is a result of the test of the chance to trigger, rather than being a range-based jackpot or determinant.
So at the end of any paid spin it's purely a test of 1 in (n) to see whether a player wins the jackpot.

Nothing more to be added here then I think with all said and done, it's smiply down to luck and bugger all else

 

[AGW]

Congratulations. I agree inetbet is one of the best.

 

[Zoozie]

3000$ on 10$ bet is only 300*bet-size. You can lose that on slots again in a few hours actually. Remember that, dont play them back if you actually are ahead.

Sorry to be a party pooper.

 

[oyw7862]

thanks zoozie

I have cashed out them and left 250$ to play with then cashed out another 2000.

but yes, it is a small RJ. but a win is a win.