I think in all fairness in many instances the affiliate programs and the casinos are seperate operations and I would imagine preparation for exit from the casino perspective is a much more intensive process.
Those two groups are the only groups I am aware of that are pulling out entirely, but I expec others to follow. There still seems to be some confusion over whether it was an MG decision or an operator decision. Strikes me that a handful of the big operators decided to pull out and therefore MG decided it wasn't worth continuing so pulled the plug on everyone.
Assuming this is the case, that puts a lot of extra stress on the smaller operators who now have to rush to find solutions. A cynic might suggest that it rather sounds like the big boys trying to force out the smaller guys, but maybe that's just a by-product.
I fully expect to see MG groups close or merge now.
Of course US law might suddenly all change if Barney's stuff comes off. Only time will tell, but it may come too late for some. I'm still trying to work out how/why this gives MG a problem...surely if it's a payment processing thing then it makes sense to let the individual operators decide if the cost justifies the position.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote


For one thing, we have a new administration coming in who are more supportive of online gambling. Also, why couldn't Microgaming wait until the results of the Kentucky case? You can't assume you are going to lose. It appears to me that Microgaming is freaking out unnecessarily. The sky is not going to fall.


Bookmarks