Problem with 3Dice - Limits?

**aodat2** · 24th March 2008, 02:44 PM

I was playing at 3Dice when I suddenly thought I wanted to Play some Baccarat.

Was betting about $70-100 on Banker all the time until I thought I wanted to play on Player so I clicked on it and this is what I got. Geez... are they trying to say that I can only bet $60 coz they know the player run is coming? Sure enough, I played on at $60 and believe it or not, it came 7 times Playes in a row!!!

Is this called UNFAIR or is this just called cheating?

**babs7262** · 24th March 2008, 04:14 PM

They have lower limits because they are fairly new compared to other casinos. They dont have the large player base as others so that means they probably dont get as many deposits. They want to make sure they can pay you if you win. Im sure the limits will go up when they get bigger. I would rather play somewhere they can pay within hours rather than play some place where they gamble as to whether or not they can play a winner who wins over their casino's budget!

**zap987** · 24th March 2008, 04:25 PM

This does seem to be a mistake though, since you can bet $180 on tie and banker but only $60 on player. Not that it makes any difference or is cheating in any way but it wouldn't surprise me if it gets changed very soon to $180 on everything.

**aodat2** · 24th March 2008, 04:48 PM

Originally Posted by zap987

This does seem to be a mistake though, since you can bet $180 on tie and banker but only $60 on player. Not that it makes any difference or is cheating in any way but it wouldn't surprise me if it gets changed very soon to $180 on everything.

Just to show that what you said is not really the case, here's another screenie of the bet that I wanted to make which is above $180 on BANKER.

Do notice carefully the $100 bet which is already on the Banker. I intended to click another $100 on Banker but it gave me a problem. Fair enough, table limit is $180. But $60 on Player??? What's that all about???

**zap987** · 24th March 2008, 04:57 PM

You can however add another $80 to your $100, just that you have to choose smaller chips. No idea why this game doesn't offer 'Bet the remaining $80' like most others do.

As for $60 being max on player it seems like someone just entered the wrong number and so few people play baccarat that high that noone noticed before.
Or maybe they are just being nice since the house edge on player is higher and it would make no sense to bet on it anyway. If that was the case they would probably limit tie bet a lot though.

**mysticjoz** · 24th March 2008, 05:54 PM

This does appear to be an error. and I am sure once Enzo sees it they will correct it as the Screenshot clearly shows the max bet and this should not matter if you bet on player, banker or tie.

Pm Enzo .. I am sure he will fix it, or explain it.
I personally never did like baccarrat. (it would always go against my bet

so I never found it fun!)

**babs7262** · 24th March 2008, 07:04 PM

Ahh
sorrry bout that, thought this was about the betting limit, got confused!

my apologies

**3Dice** · 25th March 2008, 10:51 PM

Hi Guys,

Many of the table games have field limits that are different from the table limit (e.g. roulette). Nothing unfair about that. That said, the player limit was indeed set wrongly (and is 180 just like banker). The fix is being rolled out and I've added a bonus to aodat's account for bringing this to our attention.

Kindest Regards,

Enzo