100 % Payout VS. Partial Payout

[winbig]

If (and that's a big IF) a casino chooses to enforce a limit on withdrawals, it shouldn't be flat. Instead, it should be based on the sum of all deposits made by the player within the past x-amount of time, and progressive jackpot wins should never be subject to this rule.

For example, some places set a weekly withdrawal limit of $3,000. This is downright insulting to someone who deposits $1,000 at a time, and obviously they should not play at such a prohibitive place.

A weekly withdrawal limit of 100 times the sum of the player's deposits within the past month, or something similar, would be a more realistic total.

But of course, no withdrawal limit AT ALL would be ideal.

I've read some cases here at CM where the monthly WD limit was actually LOWER than their most recent deposit. It took them about 2 months to just get their deposit back, let alone winnings.

[SlotsWizard]

I've read some cases here at CM where the monthly WD limit was actually LOWER than their most recent deposit. It took them about 2 months to just get their deposit back, let alone winnings.

I'm not sure what's worse, the casino who implemented the rule or the player who voluntarily deposited there.

[juliack]

The bottom line whether to play a casino or not should be if they cannot afford to pay all at once, any player cannot afford to play at their casino. Again, if online casinos want to compete with B&M casinos they better get with the program. Cheers

[SlotsWizard]

The bottom line whether to play a casino or not should be if they cannot afford to pay all at once, any player cannot afford to play at their casino. Again, if online casinos want to compete with B&M casinos they better get with the program. Cheers

I agree.