Cirrus:Worst Casino of 2007

**parpol** · 16th January 2008, 09:09 PM

Hello, why Cirrus is the worst of 2007? I in 4 months I was paid $ 7000

. They are slow in making payments but pay.

**winbig** · 17th January 2008, 03:12 AM

I guess you're not up overall at their casino....Just wait until you are, and then see how they treat you

Even if they pay (albeit slowly), does that really warrant supporting the Virtual Group?

**chuchu59** · 17th January 2008, 04:20 AM

They still might pay if you are an overall winner. My guess is that they use the RNG to decide which 5% of the players they pay so that it can be used as evidence that they still pay out to customers. There have just been too many player issues and they have had enough opportunities to redeem themseles. Tread carefully, Parpol.

**vbdragon** · 17th January 2008, 05:09 AM

I'm with Chuchu59 ..
I would advise extreme caution playing a Cirrus.

In fact I would advise you to never play there again.

Obviously it is a gamble when you bet your money,
but why take the added risk of "Will they pay me?" when it is a ROGUE CASINO?

Take care & good luck.

**parpol** · 17th January 2008, 09:52 AM

Ok, thanks for the advice.

**debbiek** · 18th January 2008, 04:01 AM

i have and still do play at Prism Casino and BetRoyal. Both of these casinos have paid large withdrawls and I honestly don't feel you can beat their offers/bonuses. They have improved greatly because i will admit, there was a time where it was a major hassle getting paid from BetRoyal about 6 months ago. I always did get paid, but i had to stay on top of things.

i have also played at all of the Mainstreet Group, Bodog, and Wagerstreet casinos over the past 6 months. All of these casinos were terrible in my opinion. No bonuses whatsoever and the money was gone in no time. After numerous deposits and continual losing, i don't even play at any of them anymore.

For pure value and fun, the two casinos i mentioned at the top of this post I would definitely recommend. I generally play slots - 5 or $10 per spin and have done nicely. Even if i lose, I play for quite some time and the money is not gone in the first 20-30 minutes. That's my opinion as I have deposited there numerous times.

**lojo** · 18th January 2008, 04:10 AM

Originally Posted by debbiek

i have and still do play at Prism Casino and BetRoyal. Both of these casinos have paid large withdrawls and I honestly don't feel you can beat their offers/bonuses. They have improved greatly because i will admit, there was a time where it was a major hassle getting paid from BetRoyal about 6 months ago. I always did get paid, but i had to stay on top of things.

i have also played at all of the Mainstreet Group, Bodog, and Wagerstreet casinos over the past 6 months. All of these casinos were terrible in my opinion. No bonuses whatsoever and the money was gone in no time. After numerous deposits and continual losing, i don't even play at any of them anymore.

For pure value and fun, the two casinos i mentioned at the top of this post I would definitely recommend. I generally play slots - 5 or $10 per spin and have done nicely. Even if i lose, I play for quite some time and the money is not gone in the first 20-30 minutes. That's my opinion as I have deposited there numerous times.

Why bother?

**lojo** · 18th January 2008, 04:19 AM

I 'backed that horse'. They always treated me just fine, I challenged the PaB section on some of the casinos and they were 'fine' for a while (but each screwed a player eventually). I spoke against one manager in the group (with good reason) and lost juice with all of them. Two seperate casinos 'played games' with my withdrawals. I quit depositing there in the privacy of my own home.

Count your blessings and keep your mouth shut (unless you are speaking kindly of them) and you may be paid. Just don't win anything big, and don't piss off daddy or you might go without dinner tonight

I wanted them to do well, I still do. But you have to know that defending them in this thread will get you nothing but the edge of flamed.

Casinomeister gave them an award. Will you wear it too?

**debbiek** · 18th January 2008, 04:20 AM

why bother? I just explained that fully in my post. I would never tell a friend of mine to go and deposit at the Mainstreet group of casinos for example because they could go open their window and just throw their money out.

The point is if you are looking for value and entertainment with your money, then a bonus that offers no minimum play and no max cashout is a real advantage. The slots are not as tight there and you have a very good starting bankroll to play. That's why I bother in addition to the fact they have always paid me.

**lojo** · 18th January 2008, 04:25 AM

Originally Posted by debbiek

why bother? I just explained that fully in my post. I would never tell a friend of mine to go and deposit at the Mainstreet group of casinos for example because they could go open their window and just throw their money out.

The point is if you are looking for value and entertainment with your money, then a bonus that offers no minimum play and no max cashout is a real advantage. The slots are not as tight there and you have a very good starting bankroll to play. That's why I bother in addition to the fact they have always paid me.

See my other post.

When that group actually divests certain casinos - completely- and those casinos change their names, I might buy what you are saying (as I have said in the past) but as long as the Virtual 'stable' answers to an accounting department that can not, after all of this time, pay an owed wager, and as long as individual managers get to play games with owed wagers, and as long as Virtual is Virtual - Cirrus can have the honors this year. It would have been just as easy for BB to give the dubious honor to ANY of the casinos in the group.

Again, I WANT them to do well, they never will as they are.