I just received an email in my spam box for the rogued casino Palace of Chance. It contained 3 coupons for 100% deposit bonus with no playthrough and no max cashout. If it's too good to be true.....
![]() |
![]() |
I just received an email in my spam box for the rogued casino Palace of Chance. It contained 3 coupons for 100% deposit bonus with no playthrough and no max cashout. If it's too good to be true.....
# Bonuses of 100% or more are NON CASHABLE and have a maximum cash out of 10 (ten) times the amount of the deposit, unless previous agreement with management. Any special agreement will be confirmed by e-mail.
http://www.palaceofchance.com/rules_promo.php
Of course it's too good to be true, even though http://www.palaceofchance.com/p_monthly.php says:
200% Bonus
NO Playthrough
(25X for BJ or 3-Card Rummy)
NO Max Cash-Out
Redeem: xxxxx
Deposit $100 or More
(Redeem Coupon
Unlimited Times)
Operators: If you don't know what Transparency means, then here you go.....now how about practicing it?
Transparency, as used in the humanities and in a social context more generally, implies openness, communication, and accountability. It is a metaphorical extension of the meaning a "transparent" object is one that can be seen through. ...
I used to play there... I always kept my deposit balance $1 higher than my redeemed chips.. just in case. One day I was bored and asked for a nd (knowing I'd never deposit again) won, got the run around, denied withdrawal, new documents requests, etc. said eff it. Why bother?
There was a high profile screwing over of a Casinomeister member, and this was ANOTHER of their evil terms. The max cashout can also be applied to deposits WITH NO BONUS, and they robbed a player of most of a Random Jackpot, gained from a small deposit with no bonus attached. Further, when challenged on the validity of their calculations used to apply this evil term, they deleted the player's transaction history*, in contravention of rules requiring such histories to be kept for a certain period of time - not that there would be anyone in authority in Costa Rica that would give a rat's **** about enforcing the rules anyway.
* From the RTG records that is, a couple of copies still exist as the player in question expected some kind of "stunt" after the refusal to pay, and took 72 screenshots of the life transaction history of the account (72 pages worth).
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Take a look through the complaints section ..there are lots and lots oF POC and Virtual problems and no pays .
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
Mark Twain
Not to stir old turds, and I won't engage her on this topic; but did you reach a conclusion on this VWM? As there was none posted I have assumed she had recieved more 'comps' than deposits made. Simple yes or no or no answer is fine. I'm not going to engage this discussion again. Just curious.
Last edited by bryand; 29th January 2008 at 10:11 PM.
Bookmarks