It's an unclear term. This is shown by how it has been interpreted differently according to when a player signed up.
If it was intended that only players whose currency was unsupported could use dollars, then that clause should have been separated from the first paragraph which deals with players whose home currency IS offered by the software. It should then have been part of a separate paragraph which clearly dealt with players whose home currency was NOT supported by the software.
In terms of "bonus abuse" a UK player using the US dollar is only getting half the amount of free money, but in terms of "entertainment" is getting DOUBLE.
Since the industry keeps on about how they want us to play "for entertainment" they should be happy to accept play in a lower value currency.
If two cinemas in a city were showing the latest blockbuster, but one charged £10, and the other only £5-50, where would you most likely go to see it?
One reason why the casino might NOT want UK residents playing in the US Dollar is that they make only half what they would were they playing in UK Pounds, and this has nothing to do with "entertainment", and all to do with getting as much as possible from the player.
Given that the US players can no longer play, why do they still offer the US Dollar? Surely they should only offer the Pound, Euro, and Canadian dollar, and tell players whose currency is not supported they can only use the Euro, which is the European equivalent of the universally accepted US Dollar, and is the only serious contender for a "world currency" to replace the US Dollar.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks