- Joined
- Jun 19, 2006
- Location
- UK
Just trying to decipher the ramifications of this and whether its truly a big advantage to the player! Any thoughts?
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us

I wouldn't say "advantage" because the player has no advantage in these games and is not expected to win money over time. I suppose it is an advantage in the sense that the player has better odds than standard. The 4 available "zero house edge" games are blackjack, roulette, baccarat, and Jacks or Better.Just trying to decipher the ramifications of this and whether its truly a big advantage to the player! Any thoughts?
Greetings, I wanted to start discussions about this unique casino product, (and not cos i am just a Rep!) but i guess an opportunity has presented itself!
Zero lounge - the truth and nothing but the truth!
We have reduced the odds for the 4 most popular casino games to take out house edge. We do have a cap on the bet amount, but we are looking at increasing these!
But How can a Casino have 100% PAYOUT you might wonder? Well, you get to play against your optimal strategy! In theory the risk on these bets is 50/50 so play well in the long run and you have a real shot!
Betfair.com is a company that leads innovation and delivers gaming solutions to the punter's advantage. Essentially, our main Sports product is an Exchange where you bet against other people - not the HOUSE! This gives on average 20% better odds over time.
I invite all of you to try the casino on the special bonus i have created for CasinoMeister Old / Expired Link no deposit required.
I welcome any suggestions and feedback, both positive and negative, and you have my word that we will continue innovating and improving our Casino to improve your experience
RedArmy![]()

i guess this doesn't apply to usa customers right, meaning the casino won't accept us for now??i guess this doesn't apply to usa customers right, meaning the casino won't accept us for now??




)




any good suggestions on how the casino product could be improved etc will be rewarded
I assume the blackjack and video poker payouts assume perfect play. Very very few people play perfectly, so the casinos still gets its vig.
Hi Redarmy,
a Blackjack minimum of $ 1,- would be fine.
I don't think so.IT'S NOT THE HOUSE EDGE THAT BEATS THE PLAYER, IT'S THE TRENDS (VARIANCE).
No, it's the house edge.
Quick proof. Bet every number on the roulette table. Now you have no variance. Did you lose money?
And what does this prove except that when you cover all numbers and there is no zero you cannot lose?
) shows that if you play 100,000 hands with blackjack with 1% advantage (as a result of card counting), the standard deviation is - if I remember correctly 100,000; if you play 1000,000 hands, the standard deviation is still 100,000, which means that if you have 1% advantage you cannot lose and you HAVE TO MAKE PROFIT. And the same applies in reverse - if you have a 1% disadvantage, you HAVE TO LOSE, if you play ONE MILLION HANDS, for example. But that does not happen often to a person, I mean playing one million hands. So IMHO the house edge is important FOR THE CASINOS because due to the law of large numbers their profit is GUARANTEED; but it is not what makes the players lose - unless the player plays a million hands of BJ or million spins in roulette flat betting.Personally I have no idea why anyone would get excited about comp points.
Typically they return around 0.001% of wagers or a $1 return on every $1000 wagered.
I would rather see them scrapped and WR reduced on bonuses.
. But that's why they will never introduce comp points for the Zero Lounge... IMHO. 
The counting card numbers listed above don't make sense. With 100,000 $1 hands and a fixed player edge of 1%, the calc on my site estimates a 99.7% chance of gain and 1 SD range of return of +/- $365. With 1 million hands, the chance of gain is nearly 100% and 1 SD is +/- $1160. Note that the ratio of $1160/$365 = sqrt(1 million/100,000). However, this is a poor estimation for card counting since card counters usually do not maintain a fixed bet size, and the player edge does not remain fixed at 1%. The actual chance of gain varies greatly according to range of bet size. For accurate results, you'd really need to use a simulator.I am not strong in math but I recommend taking a look at the YouTube videos about the MIT team beating casinos by counting cards in BJ. The guy (maybe a math teacher) shows that if you play 100,000 hands with blackjack with 1% advantage (as a result of card counting), the standard deviation is - if I remember correctly 100,000; if you play 1000,000 hands, the standard deviation is still 100,000, which means that if you have 1% advantage you cannot lose and you HAVE TO MAKE PROFIT. And the same applies in reverse - if you have a 1% disadvantage, you HAVE TO LOSE, if you play ONE MILLION HANDS, for example. But that does not happen often to a person, I mean playing one million hands. So IMHO the house edge is important FOR THE CASINOS because due to the law of large numbers their profit is GUARANTEED; but it is not what makes the players lose - unless the player plays a million hands of BJ or million spins in roulette flat betting.


Comrades,
thanks for the replies and suggestions! I have been away last week
ok so we need the limits lowered and raised at the same time. This is currently taking palce and within 1-2 months this should be in place. I will keep you posted.
I just think the lower the odds for a casino, the higher the odds for players
RedArmy
p.s. Casinomeister's freebie bonus is also getting 100% deposit bonus up to the first $100 - enjoy !
