What are the chances of this???

[hbears341]

I couldn't believe when the dealer flipped over their cards!!

[johnsteed]

***



That's awful "hbears341"!


You were all set to get 40:1 and poof!


I hope for your sake, that you have a wicked-good session to MORE than make up for that one...


Steed

***

[babs7262]

I think that's odd if you ask me !!! shame you werent playing 3 card poker

[babs7262]

It was 3 card, I think I messed up in this thread, sorry LOL

[cheekymonkey]

I couldn't believe when the dealer flipped over their cards!!

SICK.

If that ain't rigged, my name is Desmond Tutu.

[Pinababy69]

my name is Desmond Tutu.

Must behave, must behave, must behave......

[Macgyver]

***



That's awful "hbears341"!


You were all set to get 40:1 and poof!


I hope for your sake, that you have a wicked-good session to MORE than make up for that one...


Steed

***

I thought the player did win the "pair+" bet of 40:1??

Isn't that what the screenshot says?

[soflat]

I thought the player did win the "pair+" bet of 40:1??

Isn't that what the screenshot says?

You win the Pair Plus bet regardless of the dealer hand.

The Wizard lists the probability of a straight flush at 460-1, so the simultaneous dealer and player SF's must be arounf 200,000-1.

[hbears341]

Yet another sign that I'm seriously doubting the fairness of BoDog. This happened at least 5 times out of 25 hands.

[Macgyver]

You win the Pair Plus bet regardless of the dealer hand.

The Wizard lists the probability of a straight flush at 460-1, so the simultaneous dealer and player SF's must be arounf 200,000-1.

But the player got a 40:1 payout on the pair+ bet because of the straight flush, correct?

That's why I quoted johnsteed's response ...