Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 74

Thread: RTGs random jackpots-how random??

  1. #61
    vinylweatherman's Avatar
    vinylweatherman is offline Typus Infinitus Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrivePeople Likes You
    Awards:
    Frequent PosterCommunity AwardMost Popular
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,791
    Thanks
    414
    Thanked 6,841 Times in 3,669 Posts
    Rep Power
    271
    Reputation Points: 37428

    Great!

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaqwert View Post
    I used to work for RTG, as a software developer, and I worked directly on the Real Series slots.

    There is no magic spin number for the jackpot to pay off. Each spin is a completely independent event. Past spins have no impact at all on what the current or future spins will be.

    Regardless of what you have heard or haven't heard up till now, the random jackpot "chance" of hitting is the same per dollar wagered. That is the key.

    To say it mathematically, playing 100 spins at $1 a spin has the same chance of hitting the jackpot as a single spin of $100 (long run).

    So you aren't "missing out" on anything by playing lower stakes. And you aren't "gaining" anything by playing higher stakes.

    The reason is a fixed % of each dollar wagered goes to feed the jackpot, regardless of how it was wagered.

    Also the slots are truly video slots. Electronic representation of the "physical wheels" exist and for each spin the wheel stops are generated. Each stop on each wheel is equally likely. The way a payout % is achieved is by what symbols are on what wheels in what quantities. When set to a lower payout % the wheel(s) might have fewer "good" symbols and/or more "lesser" symbols.

    Also, it should be noted the wheels are not necessarily uniform. Wheel 1 could have 32 symbols, wheel 2 could have 29, wheel 3 could have 37, and so forth.

    It's very hard to spot changes in the wheels from payout % to payout% due to the fact you only need to make a minimal change to affect the %. Changing a high symbol to a low symbol on a single wheel or two very well might be the only change.
    So, this means we can calculate which RTG's have screwed the slots down tight and which are more generous by comparing reel strips from a subset of popular slots across several RTG casinos. This method was able to pretty accurately determine the payouts of Thunderstruck slots at MG casinos.


    if this were accurate, then vinylweatheman would already have 5 PCs spinning 24/7 at .01 per spin and we would see his name on the winner list every month.
    I do not require 5 PCs to do this, the one I have next door will suffice (it can do it with 5 MGs, so 5 RTGs would be easy.
    I have NEVER won an RTG random jackpot, however I did get 5 scatters on Thunderstruck over 4 weeks, so such "fishy" happenings are not unknown (unless one believes MG slots have a lower HE for low rollers).
    Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
    Back to port for unloading.
    Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.

  2. #62
    Zoozie's Avatar
    Zoozie is offline Meister Member Achievements:
    Your first GroupVeteranCreated Album pictures25000 Experience PointsFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1,120
    Thanks
    748
    Thanked 1,252 Times in 392 Posts
    Rep Power
    66
    Reputation Points: 6891
    Quote Originally Posted by zaqwert View Post

    Regardless of what you have heard or haven't heard up till now, the random jackpot "chance" of hitting is the same per dollar wagered. That is the key.
    This is excactly what I have been saying all the time. And now this comes first hand from an insider RTG-developer. Also the jackpot data sheet I saw clearly showed that the probability was dependant on bet-size. Besides the math that has been done for the slot also shows it is impossible to have same probability no matter what bet-size, because it was very easy exploitable.

    Also if the jackpot was hit after a certain fixed number of spins, this would also be exploitable by people having access to the database. And it would be a really stupid way to implement it. I rule this option out very fast.

    Zoozie

  3. #63
    Nifty29's Avatar
    Nifty29 is offline The Cash for Comment Man Achievements:
    Your first GroupVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrivePeople Likes You
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Turn right, then right. then right again
    Posts
    4,579
    Thanks
    3,874
    Thanked 3,957 Times in 1,690 Posts
    Rep Power
    183
    Reputation Points: 23318
    Great discussion people

    I vote someone from RTG comes on down and gives us the good oil....shouldnt have to wait too long for that

    I have a mate who won a 7k and a 14k jackpot last month at 2 different RTG's, plus another 8k the month before at one of the same casinos. He usually bets $2 - $5 per spin so he's not a low roller.

    Random Jackpots havent paid me a visit yet however....

  4. #64
    Credo is offline Newbie member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 30
    disclaimer: I once worked for RTG, but am not with the company anymore.

    The above statement:
    'the random jackpot "chance" of hitting is the same per dollar wagered' is true.

    But, that doesn't mean that the denomination affects the odds, with respect to the random jackpot.

    Consider this (not totally representative) scenario...
    Imagine a $1 slot machine that allocated $.99 to the game, and $.01 to the jackpot. For each spin, the house keeps the $.99, and pays you according to the reels. For the other .01, it plays another game, and pays you randomly according to some algorithm.

    Now let's say the casino wanted to offer a $2 version of this machine. They could double the paytable, and keep $1.98 and offer double the payout. But what about the other $.02? It could either double the payout, or it could give you 2 entries on the other game. They are the same in terms of expected value, but the distribution of results changes a bit.

    The important thing is that this would be a scenario in which the denomination would not change the odds on either machine, yet they share a jackpot, and the higher denom. machine would hit more often (albeit for a lower multiple of the base wager).

    This is not exactly the way it works, but the math is very much like this scenario.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Credo For This Useful Post:

    Nifty29 (2nd May 2007), Robertsgirl (2nd May 2007)

  6. #65
    Nifty29's Avatar
    Nifty29 is offline The Cash for Comment Man Achievements:
    Your first GroupVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrivePeople Likes You
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Turn right, then right. then right again
    Posts
    4,579
    Thanks
    3,874
    Thanked 3,957 Times in 1,690 Posts
    Rep Power
    183
    Reputation Points: 23318
    Interesting...

    So you are saying you get 1 'ticket' in the 'draw' for each dollar you wager i.e. a $5 wager actually gives you 5 'tickets', so your chances at hitting a RJ are better with a higher bet.

    Would this also be a good example:

    The jackpot hits at a specific 'ticket' number, and the 'tickets' start being 'issued' in numerical sequence from 1.

    So, lets say the first 5 spins of this slot from the jackpot start value are of the following denominations:

    Spin#1 = $2
    Spin#2 = $5
    Spin#3 = $1
    Spin#4 = $2
    Spin#5 = $10

    ..then the 'ticket' numbers would be issued as follows:

    Spin#1 = 1 thru 2
    Spin#2 = 3 thru 7
    Spin#3 = 8
    Spin#4 = 9 thru 10
    Spin#5 = 11 thru 20

    So, if the jackpot was to be hit at 'ticket' number 2894, and someone had a $10 spin and was issued 10 'tickets' starting at 2890 they would win it?


    I know this is a simple expression, but is it kinda close?

    If so, it would explain a great many things.

    (No - I havent been drinking - but I think I should start)

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Nifty29 For This Useful Post:

    cheekymonkey (2nd May 2007)

  8. #66
    Credo is offline Newbie member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 30
    That is exactly the idea.
    Now imagine those are not tickets, but individual independent chances to win, and you're pretty much there.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Credo For This Useful Post:

    Nifty29 (2nd May 2007), Zoozie (2nd May 2007)

  10. #67
    Zaqwert is offline Full Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 19 Times in 5 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 105
    Yes if your total spin costs you $5 you have a 5x better chance of winning on that spin that someone whose total spin was $1.

    However you also PAID 5 times as much for it.

    So it's a mathematical wash.

    Someone who buys 1,000 lottery tickets has a much better chance of winning the lottery than someone who buys a single ticket, but they have no mathematical advantage or disadvantage.

    But don't let this ticket analogy make you think there is some magic spin or ticket system, there isn't.

    Basically a random number is generated (a huge range) on each spin and if that random number is within a certain qualifying range the jackpot is triggered.

    The qualifying range grows/shrinks directly proportional to bet size.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Zaqwert For This Useful Post:

    cheekymonkey (3rd May 2007)

  12. #68
    me_and_ed's Avatar
    me_and_ed is offline Meister Member Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience PointsFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    1,260
    Thanks
    491
    Thanked 844 Times in 333 Posts
    Rep Power
    52
    Reputation Points: 4341
    All I know is that I still have not won one.

  13. #69
    lojo is offline Banned User - repetitive violations of posting rule 1.1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,127
    Thanks
    3,554
    Thanked 1,815 Times in 1,216 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 5
    Quote Originally Posted by me_and_ed View Post
    All I know is that I still have not won one.
    Me too niether

  14. #70
    Avatar73's Avatar
    Avatar73 is offline Experienced Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    232
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 71 Times in 51 Posts
    Rep Power
    23
    Reputation Points: 377
    I won a fancy 12M random .... in free play

    but nothing for real. Which I guess is kind of fair, seeing as in the big scheme of things I haven't really wagered that much on slots....

    Also in an entry-fee tournament I won a few of the Hulk RJ's, which is kinda like real-play odds! But not big and didnt win the comp either

    PS thanks for the explanation! v good.

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Random Jackpot by RTG Casinos
    By tiger2006 in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 27th September 2006, 01:28 AM
  2. RTG Progressive Slot JackPot ???
    By OMENIC in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 7th September 2006, 09:50 AM
  3. is the roulettet in expekt random?
    By catcat941 in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27th April 2006, 12:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.