Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > The Amazing World of Online Casinos and Poker Rooms > Online Casinos

Notices

Online Casinos Online Casinos - Information, Experiences, questions and such. This is no place for ads or cloaked promos. Shills and spammers be warned

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30th April 2007, 02:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 28
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 24
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 35
Rep Power: 11
Robertsgirl is on a distinguished road
Virtual Casino

This was the reason that I found and joined the C.M. I was finally paid after Bryan assisted me. They sent me $482.00--Of coarse the charged me for the Western Union. So with that in mind, I used a $50 prepaid Visa $54.95, had a large playthrough, and had to assume the cost of the Western Union $18.00, So how much of the $7500.00, did I win? $427.05.

Please keep in mind that the "coupon" did not specify the 10X cash out rule!
Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007, 04:13 PM
cheekymonkey's Avatar
Quit Gambling
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: internet
Posts: 1,043
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 902
Thanked 608 Times in 288 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 3481
Rep Power: 0
cheekymonkey has a reputation beyond reputecheekymonkey has a reputation beyond reputecheekymonkey has a reputation beyond reputecheekymonkey has a reputation beyond reputecheekymonkey has a reputation beyond reputecheekymonkey has a reputation beyond reputecheekymonkey has a reputation beyond reputecheekymonkey has a reputation beyond reputecheekymonkey has a reputation beyond reputecheekymonkey has a reputation beyond reputecheekymonkey has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robertsgirl View Post
So how much of the $7500.00, did I win? $427.05
Yuk, yuk and double yuk!
Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007, 05:05 PM
tennis_balls's Avatar
donkey
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,567
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 3 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 753
Thanked 716 Times in 436 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 3952
Rep Power: 41
tennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond reputetennis_balls has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to tennis_balls
Quote:
Originally Posted by phynqster View Post
When these slots first started a programer explained to me that they were NOT random, that the slot was set to pay off with the "random " jackpot on a certain spin number and it did not matter if players were spinning for .01 or 5.00 per spin.
if this were accurate, then vinylweatheman would already have 5 PCs spinning 24/7 at .01 per spin and we would see his name on the winner list every month.
__________________
++++ http://badtennisballs.ytmnd.com/ ++++
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to tennis_balls For This Useful Post:
amatrine (30th April 2007), cheekymonkey (30th April 2007), lojo (30th April 2007), NASHVEGAS (30th April 2007)
Old 1st May 2007, 12:13 AM
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 9
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 5 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 100
Rep Power: 0
Zaqwert is on a distinguished roadZaqwert is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by phynqster View Post
When these slots first started a programer explained to me that they were NOT random, that the slot was set to pay off with the "random " jackpot on a certain spin number and it did not matter if players were spinning for .01 or 5.00 per spin.
The reason you see the counter spinning abnormally fast or resetting itself is that it is estimateing how many spins a player is playing so when there is a player playing 5.00 spin the counter starts flying, but when they stop it takes a few seconds for the jackpot reset itself to the correct amount.
As far as setting the payout %, it has nothing to do with the random jackpot, but the casinos are able to bank together a number of the games together to form a single random jackpot that will be larger than if each machine was random on its own.
I have seen players hit the random jackpot on the first spin or after hours of play, and have seen it hit for .01 and for the 5.00 spin.
I used to work for RTG, as a software developer, and I worked directly on the Real Series slots.

There is no magic spin number for the jackpot to pay off. Each spin is a completely independent event. Past spins have no impact at all on what the current or future spins will be.

Regardless of what you have heard or haven't heard up till now, the random jackpot "chance" of hitting is the same per dollar wagered. That is the key.

To say it mathematically, playing 100 spins at $1 a spin has the same chance of hitting the jackpot as a single spin of $100 (long run).

So you aren't "missing out" on anything by playing lower stakes. And you aren't "gaining" anything by playing higher stakes.

The reason is a fixed % of each dollar wagered goes to feed the jackpot, regardless of how it was wagered.

Also the slots are truly video slots. Electronic representation of the "physical wheels" exist and for each spin the wheel stops are generated. Each stop on each wheel is equally likely. The way a payout % is achieved is by what symbols are on what wheels in what quantities. When set to a lower payout % the wheel(s) might have fewer "good" symbols and/or more "lesser" symbols.

Also, it should be noted the wheels are not necessarily uniform. Wheel 1 could have 32 symbols, wheel 2 could have 29, wheel 3 could have 37, and so forth.

It's very hard to spot changes in the wheels from payout % to payout% due to the fact you only need to make a minimal change to affect the %. Changing a high symbol to a low symbol on a single wheel or two very well might be the only change.
Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Zaqwert For This Useful Post:
cheekymonkey (1st May 2007), cynthial (1st May 2007), GrandMaster (1st May 2007), KasinoKing (2nd May 2007), lojo (1st May 2007), Nifty29 (2nd May 2007), silkprint (1st May 2007), Simmo! (1st May 2007), Slotster! (1st May 2007), sweiger (1st May 2007), tennis_balls (1st May 2007), winbig (1st May 2007)
Old 1st May 2007, 12:58 AM
mikepipe's Avatar
Dormant account
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: still progressing
Posts: 980
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 554
Thanked 645 Times in 236 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 3493
Rep Power: 0
mikepipe has a reputation beyond reputemikepipe has a reputation beyond reputemikepipe has a reputation beyond reputemikepipe has a reputation beyond reputemikepipe has a reputation beyond reputemikepipe has a reputation beyond reputemikepipe has a reputation beyond reputemikepipe has a reputation beyond reputemikepipe has a reputation beyond reputemikepipe has a reputation beyond reputemikepipe has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaqwert View Post
I used to work for RTG, as a software developer, and I worked directly on the Real Series slots.

To say it mathematically, playing 100 spins at $1 a spin has the same chance of hitting the jackpot as a single spin of $100 (long run).

So you aren't "missing out" on anything by playing lower stakes. And you aren't "gaining" anything by playing higher stakes.
Sorry?
Why dont i gain anything with higher bets? If the chance is per dollars bet, then one bet at 10 gives me as much as 100 at 0.1 - right?

Or simplier: the more dollars i bet, the higher the chance, which means, i shouldnt set the slot on auto the whole nite long with 0,01 bet, but with 0,5 bets (20x better chances )
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2007, 03:18 AM
Avatar73's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 232
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 38
Thanked 71 Times in 51 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 377
Rep Power: 13
Avatar73 is just really niceAvatar73 is just really niceAvatar73 is just really niceAvatar73 is just really nice
No, it comes back to Zoozie and being linear.

So say betting $100 in one go gives you 1/10 chance of jackpot.

Then setting a computer on all night at 0.01 makes no difference....
assume it spins 10,000 times, wagereing $100. Then overall, you would still have 1/10 chance of hitting the jackpot.

The only difference is that with one type you have one stab at 1/10 chance, and the other method you have 10,000 stabs at 1/100,000 chance.

So theres no real difference.

(aside from the fact that 0.01c spins will be less volatile, and per extra $100 range the chance of not hitting the jackpot will decrease with smaller bet size).


It's a bit like saying.... you can buy 500,000 lottery tickets for a 1M prize, or bet $500,000 on red on no-zero. Both can win the same, but with higher, smaller bets, the chances are a lot more clear cut!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2007, 08:17 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 91
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 153
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 445
Rep Power: 15
sweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nice
Cool The original questions:

Quote:
Originally Posted by pingpong View Post
This leaves me with these questions:
- Is the chance of winning the random jackpot bigger if you bet max pr spin(like rapid fire jackpots) - and is heijac doing this?
- is heijac playing cleos gold day and night 24/7?

Considering Zaqwert's info, I must say that this "heijac" is either ultra-über-extremely lucky, or something terribly fishy is going on...
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2007, 08:28 AM
Zoozie's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,074
WTGs: 21
WTGd at 44 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 700
Thanked 1,203 Times in 382 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 6525
Rep Power: 53
Zoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweiger View Post
Considering Zaqwert's info, I must say that this "heijac" is either ultra-über-extremely lucky, or something terribly fishy is going on...


I can not reveal the bet size-data from "heijac". But he was no low roller. So given the bet-size linear probability things are as they should be. Of course he also must have played a LOT.

The only thing 'fishy' is the reply from RTG/InetNet. Their slots seems to be working like all other random jackpot slots out there.

The "heijac" data is just another strong indication for the liniear bet size, and one that is easy to understand.

If you have same chance as "heijac" of hitting the several jackpots over some months with 0.01$ bet, they you have a money machine. I believe we calculated earlier it only costs 7$ average/day to spin 24 hours at 0.01$ bet-size.

But only the 2 lowest of about 50 jackpots was won at 0.20$ bet. (and no lower bets won eighter.) So.....
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zoozie For This Useful Post:
lojo (1st May 2007)
Old 1st May 2007, 09:29 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 91
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 153
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 445
Rep Power: 15
sweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nice
Yep... Of course high-rolling changes his odds for winning the RJ, but only linear, as I understood from Zaqwert. I still think winning 3 RJ's within one month sounds beyond imaginable luck. But of course, anything can happen when gambling...you can even lose
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2007, 09:32 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 91
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 153
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 445
Rep Power: 15
sweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nicesweiger is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoozie View Post
The only thing 'fishy' is the reply from RTG/InetNet. Their slots seems to be working like all other random jackpot slots out there.
That is odd, too.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Random Jackpot by RTG Casinos tiger2006 Online Casinos 23 27th September 2006 02:28 AM
RTG Progressive Slot JackPot ??? OMENIC Online Casinos 19 7th September 2006 10:50 AM
is the roulettet in expekt random? catcat941 Online Casinos 0 27th April 2006 01:41 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2009


  Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Slots Guide | Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews | Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Online Slots | Online Casino Reviews

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.

Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk