Ah, the pleasures of mediation......![]()
![]() |
![]() |
Ah, the pleasures of mediation......![]()
dominique
Online Casino Guide
8000 pages of online gambling information
Las Vegas Forum
Viva Las Vegas!
Bingo Forum
Bingo!
When I was young, people called me a gambler. As the scale of my operations increased I became known as a speculator. Now I am called a banker. But I have been doing the same thing all the time.
- Sir Ernest Cassel Private banker to King Edward VII
Jinnia...
I will add the essential facts that you forgot to mention, so people know what really went on!
Edit: Dang... Its really late over here now. I will have to clarify this tomorrow.
Last edited by schankwart; 17th March 2005 at 01:17 AM.
Schankwart, the most prudent thing for you to do now, is to stop arguing your side of this, and keep quiet.
You had an opportunity to get a fair sum of money, but you chose to not accept what was asked of you, even after being told by the person you had helping you, (Jinnia) that this was conditional on the settlement, and her advice to you was to ACCEPT THIS.
You could have gotten a settlement, put an end to this, and moved on.
You chose NOT to. Case Closed. You have lost all credibility with most people that have followed this thread. Cirrus made you a FAIR OFFER. YOU made the decision NOT to abide with a reasonable request.
Move on... you're done. Put a fork in it.![]()
unicorn40
Unicorn... You have NO idea as Jinnia is not explaining/mentioning the parts of the agreement that I COULD NOT accept!
Additionally... Something here has become VERY fishy......
I will explain tomorrow! Need to rest now.
Last edited by schankwart; 17th March 2005 at 01:24 AM.
There's a player advocate that calls hissef Bethug.....perhaps he can help you now?Originally Posted by schankwart
![]()
of all the things I've ever lost......I miss my mind the most.
based on what i read, i think posters are jumping on shank a little too hard similarly like others what jump on a casino
i know one thing, if it was me, i would NEVER write a public apology/admission of fault letter BEFORE i receive the promised funds. the reason is obvious: with cirrus's reputation, what's stopping them from negating the promised payment as soon as the player post his apology letter in public?
they would simply say, "hey! we don't need to pay. look, the player made public that is was ENTIRELY HIS FAULT. why should we pay again?"
anything detrimental to my cause, i would only do in this particular circumstance after confirmation of payment...
To be fair to Schankwart he did post on the forum that he had agreed to the 50% - the thing is what was it that Cirrus wanted him to post on the furums to enable him to get his 50%?
If it was along the lines of an apology and admitance he was wrong (which would be my guess) I can understand him not been willing to do this if he feels he wasn't in the wrong. In fact why should there be any need to post anything other than the two parties had come to an agreement and the matter was resolved?
I think it's a bit harsh to attack someone for not been willing to post something they don't agree with (i.e. tell a lie in their opinion).
The advocate you speak of has already offered his help...since he cannot come on here to defend "hissef" (assuming that was a spelling error, and not intended to offend anyone) I will be more then happy to answer any questions, or fill you in on any details you might need. Since the entire world of online gaming, and player advocates are now sitting on the edge of their seats, wondering what "bagofmaggots" has to say.Originally Posted by bagofmaggots
![]()
Instead of attacking someone, why don't you offer something that might help the situation?
The whole world? Wow ! I thought I was offering something that might help? Please excuse my spelling, no offense intended.Originally Posted by m249a
Last edited by bagofmaggots; 17th March 2005 at 04:02 AM.
of all the things I've ever lost......I miss my mind the most.
There's a good point being made here (if we can forego the *commercials* and the personal comments for a moment or two)
Players with a legitimate claim shouldn't have to publish glowing testimonials of the casino that delayed their payment in the first place!
We've had similar hassles with the Royal Dutch management, who kept a player waiting for nine months and then expected him to praise them in return for payment. Being a principled man, he told them to what to do with that proposal, and the fight continues.
In Schankwart's case it is perhaps a little different because there is dual culpability, but even there I don't think the player should be forced to post anything more than "I am satisfied with the negotiated payment I have received and now regard this issue as resolved."
jetset
Bookmarks