Lake Palace 'do an Omni' - Ecogra says casino is right to do so

[jetset]

Caruso, once - just once - I would like to see you step down from your soapbox and do something constructive about solving problems instead of the continual stream of unsubstantiated assumptions and accusations in which you appear to revel.

A uninvolved player nevertheless concerned at an unfair decision took the time and trouble to write an objective, polite and businesslike letter to the organisation responsible for the flawed decision. As a consequence, a more senior person in that organisation reopened the case and reversed, to the player's advantage the earlier decision. He then replied to Stanford's letter advising him of the result of his correspondence, and the player has been paid what was rightfully due to him.

Had you bestirred yourself beyond the borders of this message board and followed Stanford's example you would, I am sure have been extended similar courtesy.

I am beginning to suspect that you were hoping eCOGRA would be inflexible and refuse to stand up for the player so you would have something to get your teeth into in one your hostile rants. Fortunately they are somewhat fairer and more professional than that, although I doubt you will ever exhibit sufficient tolerance and flexibility yourself to recognise it.

[m249a]

[QUOTE=jetset]As a consequence, a more senior person in that organisation reopened the case and reversed, to the player's advantage the earlier decision. He then replied to Stanford's letter advising him of the result of his correspondence, and the player has been paid what was rightfully due to him. [QUOTE]

Who was the more senior person in the organisation that reversed the decision? Did this information come as a result of an official press inquiry? If so will your newsletter carry the story in the next publication? That would be some very interesting reading indeed! An exclusive interview with ECOGRA, after the decision was reversed. That level of transparency certianly would add to their reputation.

[jetset]

I believe that Stanford has already revealed that the person who corresponded with him was the CEO, Andrew Beveridge. In any event that would have to be the case, because the FGA is not a junior position in the organisation.

I hope I am wrong in sensing a degree of enmity in your post here M249. If that is a consequence of your association with a certain webmaster who has been behaving very irresponsibly of late it would be a pity because I have always respected your views and the balance that you exhibit in them.

As to reportage on this now resolved matter in our news service, that is an editorial decision that is my remit, but I will say that the facts will be reported as they have been here now that this issue has been signed off by the complainant as resolved.

[m249a]

I believe that Stanford has already revealed that the person who corresponded with him was the CEO, Andrew Beveridge. In any event that would have to be the case, because the FGA is not a junior position in the organisation.

I hope I am wrong in sensing a degree of enmity in your post here M249. If that is a consequence of your association with a certain webmaster who has been behaving very irresponsibly of late it would be a pity because I have always respected your views and the balance that you exhibit in them.

As to reportage on this now resolved matter in our news service, that is an editorial decision that is my remit, but I will say that the facts will be reported as they have been here now that this issue has been signed off by the complainant as resolved.

Way off base my friend.......I enjoy reading your newsletter, and based upon the number of hits and replies this thread has gotten since it started I was thinking it might be worth a mention in your newsletter. Please do not ever think that I would be so hasty as to stab you in the back after all the help you gave me in the past.

[jetset]

That is pleasing to me - I was being over-sensitive.