Boy that was funny
|
|
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksBoy that was funny
Senior Member
So much for the Montana dispute. I wish I could say this was a matter of opinion and there are two sides here, but there really isn't. Kiss is rogue and the Montana dispute process is bogus.Originally Posted by jetset
Which means if you are playing in an RTG casino, there is a high level of risk.
When the U.S. finally bans internet Gaming I will just laugh. They have it coming.
Stanford.
It will not be funny if the USA banned online gambling at all. And for you to say that something is wrong.
People should have a choice what they can do with there money.
Senior Member
I think it is just a matter of time. A lot of players moblized last time. I doubt they will next time. I know I won't bother with letters and phone calls in the future.
Things like taking this persons money and then not paying will just provide additional fuel to the fire. And this new breed Republican Party who owes their dominance to evangelicals are not exactly known for their tolerance.
Look for disgruntled players to start providing key senators and congressmen with links to threads just like this one.
Stanford.
Standford, people have done that in the pass,
All going to happen is casinos will pad there pocket,money talks
Also most of the christian be in vegas on the slots, they have buses full of sisters going to vegas. I even know pastors kicking in vegas
Experienced Member
Two points
Though Kiss is gone I think the group is still operating GiantVegas. E-mails from this group seems to be kind of heavy as of late. (I could be wrong on the relationship though). Anyone playing KISS since early this year was flirting with trouble.
In my opinion the US would be better trying to control and tax internet gambling verses banning such. Think of the play and respect if onlines were governed and regulated by a US based gaming comission like Neveda is? If I had my choice of playing in some backroom or in casino that is regulated as such the choice is simple. Taxes would be focused on the casino's profit/handle with the players having the obligation of reporting winnings as we all do today. Online mutual betting today is legit in the US and appears to contirbute to some minor growth for the sport of kings. (check out You Bet traded UBET NASDQ)
Though the first approvals would be for the Bush cronies.
Buck
Senior Member
Bush allegiance is to the religious right and they won't be big on online gambling - which they will quickly link to online porn.
The advantage to limiting gaming to Landbased is obvious. It provides jobs. It helps the overall economy. The tax revenue is still there. And it is easier to control.
Those that have invested billions in building huge casino hotel complexes have money too. I don't think they are going to lobby hard to share their customer base with overseas competition.
But mostly, thanks for bringing this thread to the top again. I see no reason to let Kiss/Giant Vegas/Montana off the hook. The biggest disappointment to me was with the Montana resolution process.
Stanfords.
Alot of pastors, sisters and brothers of the church be gambling, they love to run to vegas or to the indian casinos. They cant stop porn, pot or gambling.
Bush need to step back if he thing he going to control my money.
Experienced Member
Beware
Last edited by buck; 18th December 2004 at 12:12 AM. Reason: more info
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks