INETBET agitation

[AceMan76]

I'm not suprised why T&C's are nowadays what they are

Actually, the more detailed the T&C are, the better for everyone. As a player, you should want detailed T&Cs. The more broadly written they are, the more ambiguity. Guess who gets to interpret the ambiguities (not the player)!

[Sodax77]

Actually, the more detailed the T&C are, the better for everyone. As a player, you should want detailed T&Cs. The more broadly written they are, the more ambiguity. Guess who gets to interpret the ambiguities (not the player)!

True and false

But i'm afraid that because one country, some casino may change/upgrade their T&C (regularly).

Why eg ladbrokes do not accept players from US?
Because legal reasons.
There was same thing with 32Red.

While i read Ladbrokes T&C, it takes "few seconds".
But there is some casinos, who have million reasons what you can't do.

Gambling should be entertainment. Right?

[winbig]

Gambling should be entertainment. Right?

Yes, but it only takes a few bad apples out there to ruin it for everyone....which has happened, or they wouldn't be so strict on bonuses as they are today. That goes for any casino.

[Sodax77]

Can you change the title? Thanks.

[caruso]

Bad apples? what is a "bad apple"?

iNetBet are not a fault for holding a player to a published term. Point noted about the withdrawal amount discrepancy, but the problem was caused by the terms infringement.