Three Royals in a week nets player $736,407.00

**jonevegas** · 13th April 2006, 11:53 PM

TAP.....TAP.....TAP....... The ones who know are still sitting back conspiring....What just a while longer this is funny, hahahaha.

**nafanny29** · 14th April 2006, 12:26 PM

Im suprised the casino hasnt made a big thing of the win. In Vegas pictures of slot jackpot winners = $$$ of slot revinue doesnt it

**cipher** · 14th April 2006, 05:43 PM

Originally Posted by nafanny29

Im suprised the casino hasnt made a big thing of the win. In Vegas pictures of slot jackpot winners = $$$ of slot revinue doesnt it

Hi Na Fanny:

I'm surprised the casino (STARLUCK) has not cultivated what could have and should have been a Public Relations bonanza. In any event the player in this case was in fact playing Video Poker at $500.00 per hand. He started with a wire transfer deposit of $5,000.00 and elected to NOT participate in any bonuses.

After the first Royal was hit he had an account balance of a quarter of a million dollars which from that point provided him the wherewithall to proceed with hitting two more Royals. All three Royals occurring within a weeks time.

At this point I'll let STARLUCK CASINO of PARTY POKER fame write their own epitath as to why they handled this matter in the trashy way that the did. But I certainly wouldn't advise anyone to deposit with this group for POKER and/or Casino play.

This is the third go around that I've had with this group and each one seems to have gotten appreciably more difficult to resolve each time.

Thanks again to Bryan and to all of you posters here on the Casinomeister website.

Lastly, yes, every dime that was owed was collected.

Have a good one.

**jonevegas** · 14th April 2006, 06:36 PM

Thanks for letting us all know, I had a suspicion it was Starluck as I do not know many that will let you bet this high.

**spearmaster** · 14th April 2006, 06:37 PM

At one time Starluck did NOT deal normal VP games - they were like slots. So this is quite an interesting story... either it indicates that they finally fixed the software to deal random cards and just did a bad job setting the limits... or else they tried to fix the machines and made a hash of it

**suzecat** · 14th April 2006, 09:13 PM

Originally Posted by spearmaster

At one time Starluck did NOT deal normal VP games - they were like slots. So this is quite an interesting story... either it indicates that they finally fixed the software to deal random cards and just did a bad job setting the limits... or else they tried to fix the machines and made a hash of it

Glad to get the lowdown on the win. Be it mojo or luck that was involved, it clearly proves that Karma is alive and well and POWERFUL.

**caruso** · 14th April 2006, 11:48 PM

Thanks for putting this one definitively to bed.

Amazing isn't it? Party Poker / Starluck an another group on the UK stock market, yet they apparently consider it perfectly acceptable business practice to try to deny a quarter million dollar payment - a payment which in context really isn't all that large, just 1500 $500 units.

It just flabbergasts me the way everyone in this industry seems to regard us all with utter contempt. Sure we can deny this payment - just a dumb gambler, right? So what we're on the UK AIM? What's that got to do with paying our customers? Pay dumb gamblers?? - get outta there.

Just beyond belief.

**cipher** · 15th April 2006, 12:15 AM

Originally Posted by caruso

Thanks for putting this one definitively to bed.

Amazing isn't it? Party Poker / Starluck an another group on the UK stock market, yet they apparently consider it perfectly acceptable business practice to try to deny a quarter million dollar payment - a payment which in context really isn't all that large, just 1500 $500 units.

It just flabbergasts me the way everyone in this industry seems to regard us all with utter contempt. Sure we can deny this payment - just a dumb gambler, right? So what we're on the UK AIM? What's that got to do with paying our customers? Pay dumb gamblers?? - get outta there.

Just beyond belief.

Hi Caruso:

I totally agree Caruso, but you need to add the word three to "quarter million dollar payment" It really makes me wonder how many players there are that are getting shafted right, left and center.

In this instance, it was just a fluke that this player got in touch with me as I was over at the AT&T Pebble Beach PRO/AM and generally I don't take my laptop with me when I go to Peeble.

Have a good one.

**nektar4d** · 15th April 2006, 12:35 AM

all the way.
(Congrats everybody involved)

Is there also any amazing screenshot available ?!?

**Vesuvio** · 15th April 2006, 02:13 AM

Originally Posted by nektar4d

Is there also any amazing screenshot available ?!?

Given the documented behaviour of this software (http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...re-glitch.html) I wouldn't be particularly suprised if the same pat royal was dealt three hands in a row