Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: South Dakota Bans Smoking in Casinos

  1. #1
    pokeraddict's Avatar
    pokeraddict is offline Webmaster Achievements:
    Meister ReferrerVeteran10000 Experience PointsReferral Meister Second ClassFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,757
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 736 Times in 362 Posts
    Rep Power
    67
    Reputation Points: 4036

    South Dakota Bans Smoking in Casinos

    South Dakota, home of "Wild West" casino town Deadwood and hundreds of video gambling establishments has passed a smoking ban in all casinos that is basically a signature from the governor away from becoming law. Estimates are that this would cost the state 30% of their gambling revenue which is the #2 income stream for the state behind sales tax as the ban will not affect the reservation casinos. There also are not bans in casinos in North Dakota or Iowa which will drive some of the players out of state.

    I guess this is great news for the reservations and online gambling. Last night I was talking to an operator in Deadwood and they were terrified of this passing the Senate today. I'm libertarian and believe the markets can decide this and several casinos already have non smoking sections and all have non smoking poker rooms. This will likely destroy the Deadwood industry as well as video lottery casinos at a time when things are already quite slow.

    http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/arti...e865907955.txt

    The South Dakota Senate voted 21-14 Wednesday to extend a state smoking ban to bars, video lottery casinos and Deadwood gambling halls.

    In doing so, the Senate might also have voted to worsen the state budget deficit by encouraging gamblers who like to smoke to take their business to Native American casinos and others where smoking is allowed, critics of the ban said.

    "It was very disappointing," said Republican state Sen. Tom Nelson of Lead, who opposed the ban. "I thought we had a good argument, particularly in a year when we have these economic woes. We still have at least a $30 million budget gap to make up, and quite possibly, next year, we could have an additional $20 to $25 million in that gap."

    Gambling industry lobbyists have argued the ban could cost the state $25 million to $30 million a year as play on video lottery is reduced. Nelson said there would be additional losses in Deadwood gambling.

    Supporters argue that the health benefits of protecting the public and workers from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke will pay for any losses over time. They also doubt the economic loss will be as severe as opponents of the ban predict.

    "I don't think that number is accurate, especially when there's no place else they can go to smoke," Sen. Stan Adelstein, R-Rapid City, said after the vote. "There could be some impact. But they are playing because they like to play, not because they like to smoke."

    There had been some speculation in the Capitol that Gov. Mike Rounds might veto the bill because of its potential budget impacts. Video lottery is a crucial state funding source that provides more than $100 million a year. Rounds typically doesn't discuss vetoes in advance. And spokesman Joe Kafka said by e-mail Wednesday that the governor didn't have a comment on HB1240.

    Round has spoken critically about the human damage done by smoking.

    Nelson said he didn't have an opinion about a potential veto. Adelstein said he thought it was unlikely.

    In approving HB1240, the Senate expanded an existing ban on smoking in public places to include bars and casinos, as well as restaurants with liquor licenses. Exceptions to the ban are motel rooms, cigar bars and smoke shops.

    It took two hours of floor debate Wednesday and an amendment that reduces the legal penalty for violating the law to move the bill out of the Senate by a larger margin than some senators expected.

    Sen. Frank Kloucek, D-Scotland, proposed the amendment, which would reduce the penalty from a Class 2 misdemeanor to a petty offense. It was an important change in shaping the final vote total, Nelson said.

    "It took a lot of bite out of the penalty, but it's still a very enforceable law," he said. "That's why the margin became so much larger."

    Because of the amendment, the South Dakota House must agree to the change. That chamber had already passed the bill last month with the higher penalty.

    Adelstein said the $25 fine that goes with the petty offense could be multiplied by the number of people smoking in an establishment and charged to the owners.

    "Truth be told, it could be a very serious penalty," he said. "If you find 30 smokers in a place, that's $25 times 30."

    A Senate bill mandating a similar ban failed in that body last month on a 17-18 vote. But the House version added exceptions for motel rooms, cigar bars and smoke shops.

    Supporter said those additions were key in winning more Senate support the second time through.

    Adelstein said he thinks the bill is going to come out of conference committee, get the governor's approval and become law. And it will save South Dakota money over time, he said.

    "In the long run, the state pays for every smoker," he said.

    Sen. Gordon Howie, R-Rapid City, voted against the bill but said he understood the importance of the health arguments.

    "There's a compelling health argument, so that carries a lot of weight," Howie said. "It comes right down to whether you decided this is an argument about health or about personal rights and responsibilities."

    In the Senate on Wednesday, health won.

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to pokeraddict For This Useful Post:

    GGW Laurie (5th March 2009), jas2587 (5th March 2009), lots0 (5th March 2009), Mousey (5th March 2009), polli123 (6th March 2009), winbig (5th March 2009)

  3. #2
    jas2587's Avatar
    jas2587 is offline Meister Member Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures25000 Experience PointsSocial Magnet!Friends R Us
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    1,820
    Thanks
    4,355
    Thanked 1,404 Times in 749 Posts
    Rep Power
    73
    Reputation Points: 8060
    yep smoke at home an play online

    Cindy

  4. #3
    mistertee's Avatar
    mistertee is offline Experienced Member Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsPeople Likes YouFriends R UsCreated Blog entry
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lousy-ana
    Posts
    143
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    105
    Thanked 61 Times in 42 Posts
    Rep Power
    17
    Reputation Points: 315
    Quote Originally Posted by jas2587 View Post
    yep smoke at home an play online

    Cindy
    lol- good answer Cindy !! That's what I do

  5. #4
    oldtrvlagt's Avatar
    oldtrvlagt is offline Senior Member Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures10000 Experience PointsFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    809
    Thanks
    960
    Thanked 556 Times in 366 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    Reputation Points: 3033
    That stinks...I smoke..I admit it and I think they will find if they do this they'll learn (by losing $$$$) a lesson. We've been to Deadwood several times and did enjoy it. There is a casino in Bangor, Maine that opened a few months ago. They had a totally non-smoking policy. The first time we went there we went outside to smoke which is slightly annoying. A short time later they announced they were losing money and recinded the "no smoking" policy and seem to be doing much better

  6. #5
    Mousey's Avatar
    Mousey is offline Ueber Meister Mouse Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures25000 Experience PointsOverdriveSocial Magnet!
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Up$hitCreek
    Posts
    2,854
    Thanks
    2,294
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 1,304 Posts
    Rep Power
    109
    Reputation Points: 12893
    With all these no-smoking bans, anyone tried the e-cigs or electronic cigs? I've got one and I'm not sure whether it's going to take the place of the old cancer sticks or not... For right now, it's sort of a back up for times I'm too long in smoke free areas.

    If you use these, tho, be warned of hysterical non-smokers who STILL want you thrown out for 'smoking'.
    Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
    The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.

  7. #6
    oldtrvlagt's Avatar
    oldtrvlagt is offline Senior Member Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures10000 Experience PointsFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    809
    Thanks
    960
    Thanked 556 Times in 366 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    Reputation Points: 3033
    Hey Mousey..where do you get them? I love being in the smoking section (where I am supposed to be) and having someone start waving their arms at me...I tend to puff even more

  8. #7
    Mousey's Avatar
    Mousey is offline Ueber Meister Mouse Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures25000 Experience PointsOverdriveSocial Magnet!
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Up$hitCreek
    Posts
    2,854
    Thanks
    2,294
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 1,304 Posts
    Rep Power
    109
    Reputation Points: 12893
    Quote Originally Posted by oldtrvlagt View Post
    Hey Mousey..where do you get them? I love being in the smoking section (where I am supposed to be) and having someone start waving their arms at me...I tend to puff even more
    Best place to start is Google.
    http://www.google.com/search?q=elect...rlz=1I7GWYF_en

    Read till your eyes bleed, then go to eBay .... LOL I think hubby bought mine there. But do your research first (they are quite pricey to get started -- but then, so is a carton of cigs), then decide what type, etc.
    Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
    The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Mousey For This Useful Post:

    oldtrvlagt (6th March 2009)

  10. #8
    vinylweatherman's Avatar
    vinylweatherman is offline Ueber Meister Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrivePeople Likes YouFriends R Us
    Awards:
    Frequent PosterCommunity AwardMost Popular
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,224
    Thanks
    373
    Thanked 6,441 Times in 3,454 Posts
    Rep Power
    257
    Reputation Points: 35319
    I don't think that number is accurate, especially when there's no place else they can go to smoke," Sen. Stan Adelstein, R-Rapid City, said after the vote. "There could be some impact. But they are playing because they like to play, not because they like to smoke.
    North Dakota?
    Reservations?

    Here in the UK, the very same argument (almost) was used to calm fears that our pubs and bars would lose drinkers. One claim was that non-smokers would easily replace any smokers that were lost.

    Now, a couple of years later, there are fears that the traditional pub (where smoking & drinking together was the norm) will be extinct in a few years more. Smokers are buying alcohol and drinking it where they can also smoke. For many, this is at home. The rules were said to be there to protect workers, but this failed to explain why the ban also made dedicated smoking rooms illegal, where there should be no need for workers to enter, and smokers could simply have been told that no service would be available there.

    South Dakota casinos seem to have the same arrangement of smoking and non-smoking areas, and will suffer a similar problem.

    Whilst those who want to smoke may go to North Dakota, or the reservations, it will STILL be their home state of SOUTH Dakota that picks up the tab for the smoking related ailments contracted whilst smoking in North Dakota's casinos, who will, along with North Dakota, reap the budgetary benefits.

    In short, revenue income shifts to North Dakota (and the reservations), but the BILLS remain with South Dakota.

    This senator understands the arguments about health & smoking, but seems to have litle grasp of how the state's finances are likely to be affected in the future.


    PS - I thought this thread was going to be "South Dakota bans online gambling"
    Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
    Back to port for unloading.
    Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.

Similar Threads

  1. Mansion bans US players
    By brianzz in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2nd February 2007, 02:04 AM
  2. North Dakota folds on proposed poker plan
    By Ian_go in forum Casino Industry Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19th October 2006, 11:15 PM
  3. North Dakota not to legalize online poker
    By mary in forum Casino Industry Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22nd March 2005, 06:47 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.