The sentence is hardly a deterrent. It's basically a fine for what could potentially have netted him £100,000 or more. Had he approached the right companies, he would have found a buyer. Cashcade should also have been fined severely for lax security that allowed this employee to take the data in the first place.
The problem is that the cost of properly securing the data is far more than the cost of paying the fines (if any) when things go wrong. In theory each affected player could sue Cashcade for damages, but this is unlikely unless they have evidence that the leak caused them damage.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks