Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 44

Thread: H.R. 2267: Internet Gambling Reg., Consumer Protect., and Enforcement Act Passes

  1. #31
    BLUEWATER is offline Full Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NoWhere
    Posts
    97
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
    Rep Power
    26
    Reputation Points: 90
    Here a link that will explain little bit better what is next.

    http://www.pokernews.com/news/2010/0...ney-f-8618.htm

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BLUEWATER For This Useful Post:

    felicie (1st August 2010), Mavin1 (31st July 2010)

  3. #32
    jolub is offline Experienced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    109
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    20
    Reputation Points: 93
    Let's hope the ban is near the end.

  4. #33
    winbig's Avatar
    winbig is offline mmmm, Foxy.
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry50000 Experience PointsPeople Likes You
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    8,229
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks
    1,371
    Thanked 3,608 Times in 2,120 Posts
    Rep Power
    166
    Reputation Points: 19093
    Quote Originally Posted by jolub View Post
    Let's hope the ban is near the end.
    It's got a long way to go, and the bill, as it is now, could go through many more transformations before it's actually presented to the president for him to sign. And even then, it may be rejected, and then the process would start all over again. Think about it though. This is one great way to get more tax money coming in, so it'd be political suicide for him not to sign it.

    The next steps are:

    * Full vote in the House
    * Senate committee vote (provided a sponsor can be found)
    * Full vote in the senate
    * Conference committee to resolve differences between House and Senate versions

    ...and ultimately:

    * Signature by the president
    Operators: If you don't know what Transparency means, then here you go.....now how about practicing it?

    Transparency, as used in the humanities and in a social context more generally, implies openness, communication, and accountability. It is a metaphorical extension of the meaning a "transparent" object is one that can be seen through. ...

  5. #34
    NASHVEGAS is offline Banned User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    MERS
    Posts
    2,235
    Thanks
    3,318
    Thanked 2,533 Times in 1,146 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 13325
    Quote Originally Posted by winbig View Post
    It's got a long way to go, and the bill, as it is now, could go through many more transformations before it's actually presented to the president for him to sign. And even then, it may be rejected, and then the process would start all over again. Think about it though. This is one great way to get more tax money coming in, so it'd be political suicide for him not to sign it.

    The next steps are:

    * Full vote in the House
    * Senate committee vote (provided a sponsor can be found)
    * Full vote in the senate
    * Conference committee to resolve differences between House and Senate versions

    ...and ultimately:

    * Signature by the president
    Then each State (as currently proposed) has the right to opt-out (or opt-in) in the event the Bill is passed and signed Federally.

  6. #35
    jetset's Avatar
    jetset is offline Ueber Meister Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Blog entry50000 Experience PointsPeople Likes YouTagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    12,357
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    2,063
    Thanked 5,467 Times in 2,355 Posts
    Rep Power
    257
    Reputation Points: 30011
    Tribal bands, too.
    jetset

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to jetset For This Useful Post:

    NASHVEGAS (31st July 2010)

  8. #36
    Simmo!'s Avatar
    Simmo! is offline Moderator Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial Magnet!Tagger Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    You say UK, I say England.
    Posts
    9,274
    Thanks
    1,694
    Thanked 4,372 Times in 2,079 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Reputation Points: 23379
    Quote Originally Posted by P.V.
    Amendment 11 (Manager’s amendment — the majority and minority member who managed the debate): Bets are to be made with prepaid cards and debit cards only; bettors will be restricted from using credit cards on Internet gambling sites. In addition, the House Financial Services Committee will have no jurisdiction on tribal rights. Amendment passes by voice vote.
    Is that right? I thought it was just to ban credit cards. The amendment above suggests eWallets are out too?


  9. #37
    NASHVEGAS is offline Banned User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    MERS
    Posts
    2,235
    Thanks
    3,318
    Thanked 2,533 Times in 1,146 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 13325
    Quote Originally Posted by Simmo! View Post
    Is that right? I thought it was just to ban credit cards. The amendment above suggests eWallets are out too?
    FWIW, have read several articles in the last few days regarding Paypal/Ebay re-entering the funding of online gambling. Keep in mind the legal and logistical (credit cards are one of the primary means of funding e-wallets) issues. It can get complicated.

  10. #38
    felicie's Avatar
    felicie is offline Senior Member Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience PointsPeople Likes You
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    somewhere else
    Posts
    1,235
    Thanks
    951
    Thanked 492 Times in 341 Posts
    Rep Power
    34
    Reputation Points: 2948
    It could sure put an end to chargebacks?

  11. #39
    DaveG39 is offline Experienced Member Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points1000 Experience PointsFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Glendale,CA,USA
    Posts
    199
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked 53 Times in 38 Posts
    Rep Power
    13
    Reputation Points: 275
    Quote Originally Posted by Simmo! View Post
    Is that right? I thought it was just to ban credit cards. The amendment above suggests eWallets are out too?
    If we can deposit directly via debit/prepaid card, why do we need ewallets? (thank you so much QT for blackballing me, effectively ending my online gambling)

  12. #40
    love2winalot's Avatar
    love2winalot is offline Playing to Win, not lose.
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Philippines/Visiting Las vegas
    Posts
    812
    Thanks
    540
    Thanked 434 Times in 267 Posts
    Rep Power
    32
    Reputation Points: 2816
    Hiya: Just remember, None of this is FREE. There is one reason, and one reason only to do this, and that is TAXES. Right now, if you play from America, at casino, "insert casino name here", you are only paying whatever processing fee there is to get the money into the Casino, via a 3rd party. Then whatever fee either the Casino will charge, or what the 3rd party will charge, to get the winnings back to you, or to your bank account.

    Now ADD IN FEDERAL TAXES. and............what ever states decide to join this venture, they will want their fair share also, so ADD IN STATE TAXES. Oh, and a little government ageny called the IRS, is gonna want theirs also.

    Some players are going to decide it is just better to keep playing how/where, they are at right now. imhop.

    unless anyone actually told the IRS that they made a total of $18,000, "as example" and demanded that the IRS tax them on the winnings?
    "All I want, is to WIN my fair share, and maybe just a teeny bit more"

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 28th October 2007, 05:46 PM
  2. Internet Gambling Regulation & Enforcement Act
    By ironjawz61 in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20th August 2007, 11:57 AM
  3. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 27th November 2006, 09:11 PM
  4. Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006
    By Rollo in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 192
    Last Post: 24th October 2006, 09:50 PM
  5. PR: Jackpot Factory Responds to the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act
    By Casinomeister in forum Casino Industry Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 13th October 2006, 11:30 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.