Here a link that will explain little bit better what is next.
http://www.pokernews.com/news/2010/0...ney-f-8618.htm
![]() |
![]() |
Here a link that will explain little bit better what is next.
http://www.pokernews.com/news/2010/0...ney-f-8618.htm
Let's hope the ban is near the end.
It's got a long way to go, and the bill, as it is now, could go through many more transformations before it's actually presented to the president for him to sign. And even then, it may be rejected, and then the process would start all over again. Think about it though. This is one great way to get more tax money coming in, so it'd be political suicide for him not to sign it.
The next steps are:
* Full vote in the House
* Senate committee vote (provided a sponsor can be found)
* Full vote in the senate
* Conference committee to resolve differences between House and Senate versions
...and ultimately:
* Signature by the president
Operators: If you don't know what Transparency means, then here you go.....now how about practicing it?
Transparency, as used in the humanities and in a social context more generally, implies openness, communication, and accountability. It is a metaphorical extension of the meaning a "transparent" object is one that can be seen through. ...
Tribal bands, too.
jetset
NASHVEGAS (31st July 2010)
Is that right? I thought it was just to ban credit cards. The amendment above suggests eWallets are out too?Originally Posted by P.V.
It could sure put an end to chargebacks?
Hiya: Just remember, None of this is FREE. There is one reason, and one reason only to do this, and that is TAXES. Right now, if you play from America, at casino, "insert casino name here", you are only paying whatever processing fee there is to get the money into the Casino, via a 3rd party. Then whatever fee either the Casino will charge, or what the 3rd party will charge, to get the winnings back to you, or to your bank account.
Now ADD IN FEDERAL TAXES. and............what ever states decide to join this venture, they will want their fair share also, so ADD IN STATE TAXES. Oh, and a little government ageny called the IRS, is gonna want theirs also.
Some players are going to decide it is just better to keep playing how/where, they are at right now. imhop.
unless anyone actually told the IRS that they made a total of $18,000, "as example" and demanded that the IRS tax them on the winnings?
"All I want, is to WIN my fair share, and maybe just a teeny bit more"
Bookmarks