INTERNET GAMBLING IS HERE TO STAY

[Casinomeister]

from infopowa news

INTERNET GAMBLING IS HERE TO STAY

State lawmakers briefed by online gambling experts

Frank Catania, former Assistant Attorney General and Director of New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement, online gaming consultant and independent director of the player protection group eCOGRA gave a straight-from-the-shoulder briefing to state legislators last Friday, emphasising that Internet gambling is here to stay.

The Internet gambling expert, who has in the past helped regulatory outfits to draft their rules, told state lawmakers from around the United States attending the annual National Council of Legislators from Gaming States in Napa, California that instead of trying to prohibit online gambling, state governments should start regulating this exponentially growing business. His views were echoed by several other experts addressing the conference.

The diverse panel of industry experts updated lawmakers on the consequences of the federal Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, which seeks to ban financial transactions with online gambling companies and has been roundly condemned for its lack of both precision and practicality.

The assessment included an examination of the 5-year-old international dispute between Antigua and the US federal government over discriminatory carve-outs in US legislation, notably online horseracing and lotteries, that exclude other WTO members from accessing the American gambling market.

The World Trade Organisation ruled against the United States’ position, resulting in the US taking the unprecedented step of retroactively withdrawing its gambling obligations from its GATT obligations and being faced with compensation claims.

While the U.S. has tried to prohibit Internet gaming, other countries have chosen to regulate it.

“The United States is going one way, and the rest of the world the other,” said Catania, who predicted that after the 2008 presidential election the U.S. would join the regulatory wave.

“The online gaming market will continue to expand regardless of any decision to regulate. Consumer demand and industry growth will force governments to act,” he asserted.

Horse racing, fantasy gaming and lotteries still enjoy exemptions from the federal Internet gaming laws, but state interpretation of those regulations varies greatly, reports Reuters. According to the panelists, about a dozen states prohibit all Internet gaming including account wagering.

“Congress amended the Interstate Horse Racing Act to include Internet access,” said Ken Kirchner, former senior vice president of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association and Breeders’ Cup Ltd. “But of the ADW companies, each has its own policies. Some will permit wagers from any state where horse racing is legal; others limit themselves to states where legal issues have been resolved.

“But I shouldn’t have to call a bookie to make a bet on the Lakers-Celtics game tonight,” he added. “I should be able to do that in a legal matter regulated by state government. It’s an entertainment experience and it’s my money. It’s like going to the movie theater. I should know that my funds are deposited with a legitimate company and that I’ll be paid if I win. And I should not be fearful of prosecution by federal or state authorities for my activity.”

Fear of prosecution has banking officials in a quandary, too, noted Ted Teruo Kitada, senior company counsel for Wells Fargo.

Under the UIGEA law, banks are charged with screening all transactions for questionable purposes, including Internet wagering, but “imagine what we have to do when the federal government and Congress can’t decide what is and what is not unlawful,” said Kitada, adding that Wells Fargo handles millions of transactions every day.

“We’re not prepared with the volume of transactions we face daily. Perhaps the idea behind the act is commendable, but the challenge is the implementation.”

Catania estimated the value of current online gambling in the U.S. at more than $15 billion.

“States are better equipped to regulate online gaming than the federal government,” he said. “States have done an excellent job in regulating traditional gaming facilities and that experience could be used to regulate online gaming.”

The reasons for regulation of Internet gaming are the same as for regulating traditional casinos or other gambling outlets, said Catania: “Keep out those that do not have good character and provide fair and honest games as a means of protecting the public from unscrupulous operators.

“We’re talking basic consumer protection,” he added, noting that states should be able to regulate such aspects as age restrictions.

“We need requirements to know where that player is and how old," he said. "Some lessons have been learned. The states have the experience and they should use it. Indian gaming is the only gambling area that the feds regulate and they’ve done a terrible job.”

Florida State Sen. Steve Geller, a past NCLGS president, moderated the discussion. “We may end up with Internet gaming whether we like it or not,” Geller said. “It’s an incredibly complex area that seems to change each week.

“States lose their ability to control what form of gambling takes place in their states,” Geller opined. “With new forms of technology, the effort now is to regulate it the best you can.”

That likely will be a different approach than that taken by the federal government, noted the experts.

The federal Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act “is bad public policy and impossible to enforce,” Catania said. “There’s an active effort now to unravel that act.”

Internet gaming is a hot-button issue for many constituents, noted John Pappas, executive director of the Poker Players Alliance. The federal ban on Internet gambling has swelled his grassroots group from 75 000 members to more than 1 million, he said.

“We have more than 100 000 members right here in California,” Pappas told the lawmakers. “These are your constituents. More than 70 million Americans play or have played poker. Poker is not a crime.”

Taking an opposing view, Rev. Jim Butler of the California Coalition Against Gambling Expansion claimed that the Internet puts more people at risk of developing gambling problems. “With Internet gambling, every home with a computer is potentially a gambling facility. We’re faced with a daunting task," he said.

[Auditor]

Prohibition does NOT work.

[suzecat]

It has been harder for the players to find the "bathtub gin" answer to playing online. Don't really appreciate the government stepping in to "save" me just in case I may be gambling addicted! They tried prohibition and it failed. They tried to regulate who I could marry..........now that has failed. When will they learn that unless they are invited to my home, I do not want them there! I thought personal freedom was the whole damn reason we lived in this freakin' country!

[bb28]

Originally Posted by suzecat

It has been harder for the players to find the "bathtub gin" answer to playing online. Don't really appreciate the government stepping in to "save" me just in case I may be gambling addicted! They tried prohibition and it failed. They tried to regulate who I could marry..........now that has failed. When will they learn that unless they are invited to my home, I do not want them there! I thought personal freedoms was the whole damn reason we lived in this freakin' country!

Great post suzecat....you said what I wanted to say!

[w8n4win]

Money is usually the key to everything, hopefully they will start thinking that direction! I personally would much rather gamble online at a casino US owned. I would feel much more secure playing at an online casino that Harrah's owns than one halfway around the world from me.

[GaryWatson]

Originally Posted by w8n4win

Money is usually the key to everything, hopefully they will start thinking that direction! I personally would much rather gamble online at a casino US owned. I would feel much more secure playing at an online casino that Harrah's owns than one halfway around the world from me.

Most of them are already US owned. It's just that loophole they need to fix. I would rather playing at a UK owned site but even the UK sites are diverted. We put a lot of trust on the sites integrity but eventually they will be held accountable. Its not happening now. The US stance doesnt help matters. It will sort itself out. Hopefully it will be for the better but I would lean towards the UK before the US, thats just through recent actions.